| Quote: Originally Posted by DA2000 | | | | |
| Dick,
PLEASE! Read the statement and the additional comments, it helps to remove the foil helmet!
We have performed literally hundreds of hours of testing on the Futaba FASST systems since this issue was reported to us. Thus far, we have NOT been able to negate the identification code in any of the transmitters that we have tested.
They have not been able to replicate the "switch bounce" themselves. But since they have heard second hand reports of it, they choose to add this as a precaution.
If any manufacturer had the policy of recalling a complete line of product after ANY person in the R/C community reported a glitch, we wouldn't have a hobby anymore.
Let them continue the testing, if they find a switching procedure that adversly affects the whole product line, I think they'll take care of it. Until that time, let's follow their recomendations and let others offline know about them. | |
| | |
I read the message and my comprehension is still pretty good
I asked why the procedure was required- I mentioned nothing about switch bounce
Simply "why is this procedure ( Precaution#2)important?"
Must I get permission to ask a simple question?