| | ||||||
| | ||||||
Please support our sponsors | ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
| |||||||
| Groundschool: 3D Flying and Aerobatics Flying, aerobatics, and 3D Huckin'! |
| View Poll Results: QQ 86" Yak or EF 88" Yak | |||
| QQ 86" Yak | | 136 | 41.34% |
| EF 88" Yak | | 193 | 58.66% |
| Voters: 329. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Belpre, Ohio Age: 18
Posts: 663
|
Just wandering which would be better overall, one has a larger wingspan which should float more? Thanks.
__________________ This is my sig, I hope you are happy with it: Blennerhassett Area Radio Control Club |
|
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Tucson, baby! Age: 33
Posts: 3,447
|
I'd say pic which one looks best to you and you will be equally imprressed. Or, of you want something closer to scale, choose EF, if you want just plain bichen looken, choose QQ. Neither of them knock my socks off, but are still both very nice planes. If I were in the market for one, it'd probably be the QQ, only because my LHS has one in the shop right now...
|
|
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Feb 2006 Age: 36
Posts: 398
|
Booth are great a friend is doing a build thread right now on the QQ and the EF's are sweet looking. What about the SD models Yak? The new team scheme is super cool looking They are even a couple bucks cheaper.
__________________ "Its NOT self cleaning, I swear" |
|
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Durango Colorado Age: 17
Posts: 1,790
|
If it was up I would vote for the sd to. All of the sd yaks are perfect flyers from my knolige. I have the 33% and it is pretty hard to stall. Anyways I voted QQ because if you want a plane that can 3d huck like no other and still kill the competition in imac then qq is obviously the choice. Just to give you an idea watch the vid of qq turning his trans off and the yak in an inverted harrier does not budge.
|
|
| | #9 (permalink) |
| lee ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Bristol. England Age: 35
Posts: 531
|
The EF tops the bill. QQ's got the heritage but the EF-88" span defo makes it float like a feather. Im sure the qq would not fly as easy n slow in the harrier. im sure you'd bereal happy with either plane. Go 3D a few planks first then any well designed bird will put a big smile on yer face!! Check out my Ef maiden- http://www.flyinggiants.com/gallery/...den_Flight.wmv Last edited by leeMcCrory; 04-17-2007 at 04:31 AM. |
|
| | #10 (permalink) |
| 3D Badboy in the making ![]() Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Bristol,England Age: 33
Posts: 99
|
My friend and i both recently bought the EF 88''Yak and i have to say they are fantastic planes,the build quality is second to none and they fly superbly.The EF yak is very scale looking and it recovers from a knifeedge loop at idle(serious rudder authority).I don't know what the QQ yak is like but i find it hard to believe that it could be any better than the EF yak.EF all the way in my book.They are cheaper aswell.Say no more.
|
|