Welcome to The FlyingGiants! - please login or click this bar to join our community...

Home About Us Newest Products Special Sales

Please support our sponsors
   

Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!!

Go Back   FlyingGiants Forums > Giant Scale Discussions > Git 'R Dun - Giant Scale!


Git 'R Dun - Giant Scale! From the box to the runway. Whatever it is, show us how you build 'em! (build threads only)

Support our Sponsors

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-03-2006, 08:18 PM   #1 (permalink)
Doo It! Doo It!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Gastonia, NC
Age: 39
Posts: 85
gdavisjr69 is offline
Default AM 37.5% Yak Wings

All,

As most of you are aware, AM just released the updated 37.5% Yak wings. I have two of their 37.5% Yaks that I had just finished up when learning of the new wings. Earlier today, I juse received the updated wings. What's interesting is that I have a red/white/blue/blue set along with an orange/checkerboard set and they are different. Are they supposed to be different form each other. They've been reinforced and updated differently comparing the two. I'll try and post pics of what I'm talking about.....

The bottom line is that the orange wings have oval lightening holes at the root rib, they've squeezed an extra rib between the 2nd and 3rd ribs, added reinforcements around the wing tube, the lightening holes are much smaller, but the ribs appear to be made out of balsa, etc. Also, the s/n ends with 1/2 and the anti-rotation dowels aren't glued in. The blue/blue one has the same lightening holes the original wings did, and they've been reinforced around the wing tube and so forth, but differently than the orange one's have. The s/n doesn't end with 1/2 as the other does. Its just very odd. Not sure what to make of it.

I'm hoping Garrett or somebody can make something of it. Just want to make sure I've got two very strong set of reinforced, "updated" wings before rehinging and so forth. Anybody have a clue? I've left a voice mail with AM and also just sent them pics, but haven't heard anything as of yet. Just hoping somebody might be in the know here at flying giants.

I'll try and add pics to help show what I'm trying to say.

Gerry
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2006, 08:20 PM   #2 (permalink)
Doo It! Doo It!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Gastonia, NC
Age: 39
Posts: 85
gdavisjr69 is offline
Default Re: AM 37.5% Yak Wings

Here are a few of the red/white/blue/blue wings.

Gerry
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC_0001.JPG (240.7 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_0002.JPG (234.0 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_0003.JPG (241.2 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_0004.JPG (217.1 KB, 11 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2006, 08:22 PM   #3 (permalink)
Doo It! Doo It!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Gastonia, NC
Age: 39
Posts: 85
gdavisjr69 is offline
Default Re: AM 37.5% Yak Wings

Here are a few of the orange/checkerboard wings.

Gerry
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC_0005.JPG (264.3 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_0006.JPG (245.8 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_0008.JPG (232.7 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_0009.JPG (229.6 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_0011.JPG (241.3 KB, 8 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2006, 08:27 PM   #4 (permalink)
Doo It! Doo It!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Gastonia, NC
Age: 39
Posts: 85
gdavisjr69 is offline
Default Re: AM 37.5% Yak Wings

Again, both wings are reinforced compared to the original wings, they've just been done differently between the two of them. Just weird they'd be different. Nobody else would have probably known unless you had two different planes to compare against.... Just trying to make sure all is well with both wing sets before hinging and setting them up. Garrett, are you there to explain?

Thanks ahead of time,

Gerry
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2006, 08:42 PM   #5 (permalink)
Hey, Crabman!!
 
Tailchaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. Calif.
Age: 61
Posts: 556
Tailchaser is offline
Default Re: AM 37.5% Yak Wings

Garrett is changing a sensor on his truck so probably won't be able to answer you right away, I'm sure when he see's your post he will reply.

Chuck
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2006, 11:10 AM   #6 (permalink)
Flyin' Around
 
f1race79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Little Rock, AR
Age: 55
Posts: 23
f1race79 is offline
Default Re: AM 37.5% Yak Wings

Gerry, since you have 2 of these and sounds like they are ready to fly. A couple of questions if you don't mind?
I am putting one of these together since I have my new wings, I am wanting to put 2 5995's in the wing and one each in the elevators. They will be running on 7.4V, that means over 400 oz. torque @.
Think this will be enough torque and not too much flexing?
Thanks for any info you can give me.
__________________

"I wish I would have thought of that"

Julius Miller
Little Rock, AR
www.rcfarmclub.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2006, 11:15 AM   #7 (permalink)
I'm Watching You!

 
TheTank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Connecticut, USA
Age: 28
Posts: 7,003
TheTank is offline
Awards Showcase
FlyingGiants Good Dude Award: For stepping up to the plate, being a part of a fundraising effort for a good cause. Thank you. - Issue reason: Thank you very much for helping with the recent donation drive.  Super-Huck!: Presented for incredible contributions from our members, to our community. - Issue reason: For bringing back the incredible action from the 2006 Don Lowe Masters in form of photos, writeups, and mass quantities of videos for all of our enjoyment. 
Total Awards: 2
Default Re: AM 37.5% Yak Wings

F1, I am running 2x5955s in the wings and it is fine. I dont however recommend only using one servo in the elevator though, as the leverage point for the linkage when only using one leaves alot of area unsupported, which could lead to flutter. I have seen one (the 40% Yak) use one elevator servo (8611A) and it worked... but it was kinda scary. I am running 4x5945a in on the elevators with great results.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2006, 11:28 AM   #8 (permalink)
Doo It! Doo It!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Gastonia, NC
Age: 39
Posts: 85
gdavisjr69 is offline
Default Re: AM 37.5% Yak Wings

Julius,

I finished these two up, but never flew them, so I can't give direct knowledge in terms of what will and won't work on this plane However, I can give you my persepctive from past planes.

I believe 2 5955's per wing will work, provided you don't try and get the absolute amount of throw you need. If you go back 7-10 years ago, pilots, including me, used to fly 40% planes with 8411's/5945's on wings--two per aileron mostly. Then many of the top pilots went to three per wing panel using 8411's/5945's. This was the norm for many years... Then 5955's/8611's came out, and people began trying two instead... However, years ago, we didn't stress ailerons nearly as much as people do now. I'd advise if you go with only two, not to fly with extreme throws on the ailerons. Also, in some cases, the surfaces back then were smaller. But I have compared some of my older planes to the current generation, and depending on the company, they are similiar in area in some cases.... so not always larger today. Again, if going with 2, I'd watch speed while cranking 3D/extreme rates at first....

Again, same thoughts on elevators. A lot of it depends on the setup more than anything else. If you end up with 50 degrees of throw, high speed walls, other high speed, large elevator type movements, one probably won't be enough. But, if you are a little tame with it, do more precision type flying, one would probably be plenty. Alot depends on setup and flying styles. Read the article that Peter Goldsmith put up regarding setups, servos, etc up at horizon. Again, he doesn't go with extreme throws so he doesn't have to use as many servos and so forth--enough to do some 3D, but not to the extreme like many do these days.

Hopefully this helps. Again, this is my perspective and I'm sure you'll get a dozen other opinions out there as well.

Gerry
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2006, 02:45 PM   #9 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
SUPERFLYJAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: STONY POINT N.Y USA
Age: 56
Posts: 993
SUPERFLYJAY is offline
Default Re: AM 37.5% Yak Wings

i had 2 8411 in each wing (37.5 yak) and it was a dog the ailerons are so huge you def need 3 8411 per half or prob get away with 2 8611a in each half
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2006, 05:14 PM   #10 (permalink)
100% EDGE Builder
 
why_fly_high's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Guthrie, OK
Age: 35
Posts: 952
why_fly_high is offline
Default Re: AM 37.5% Yak Wings

My buddy was getting blow back on the 40% Yak with 3 8411's. That was with a 1-1 ratio. Are the ailerons on the 37.5 much smaller. I would suspect that you might have the same issue with 3 being that the 37.5% should fly faster than the big 40%er with a 150 on it.

Just a thought,

Dan
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2006, 07:23 PM   #11 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
rdgood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Portland Oregon
Age: 48
Posts: 887
rdgood is offline
Default Re: AM 37.5% Yak Wings

Gerry,

I just got my replacement set also. After looking everything over ,the best I can tell - it looks like the only real difference is that all of the ribs have the oval lightening holes instead of the vertical pieces. I do believe that the wings are little bit heavier - I haven't wieghed them yet. I think these wings are bulllet proof though they seem stiffer and the covering on mine is better - the originals weren't bad a sag here and there. I definitely feel better about these wings though.


Ronster
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2006, 12:54 PM   #12 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
TrojanMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmond, OK
Age: 42
Posts: 501
TrojanMan is offline
Awards Showcase
FlyingGiants Good Dude Award: For stepping up to the plate, being a part of a fundraising effort for a good cause. Thank you. - Issue reason: Thank you very much for helping with the recent donation drive.  The GPTPDSST Award: The Gay Pride Triple Platinum Diamond Studded Steaming Faberge Turd Award. - Issue reason: GPTPDSST Award recieved photochopping the site admin. 
Total Awards: 2
Default Re: AM 37.5% Yak Wings

Just an FYI,
I weighed the new wings and the old wings. My new wings are 9 to 10 ounces heavier per wing. Not a big deal but the new wings are definitely build much stronger. Now I need to save a pound somewhere else!

Jim
__________________
Team Futaba
Plane Graphics
Sullivan Products
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Carden YAK ARF from H9 SPL Giant Scale Airframes and Kits 377 12-06-2008 09:23 PM
Extreme Flight E Yak vs Extra Stainless Skills Airframes and Kits 56 05-14-2008 11:51 PM
Yak 54 vs. Yak 55 ryan_m General Discussions - Giant Scale 9 01-10-2008 05:25 PM
Yak Attack JAS What's Hot! 4 01-04-2008 09:34 AM
Aviation models or wild hare yak ifly3d Giant Scale Airframes and Kits 15 11-21-2006 12:03 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59 AM.


  Sitemap :: Contact Us :: Community :: News :: Videos and Photos :: About Us
FlyingGiants, and The Leading Edge, are trademarks of RCGroups.com LLC. All content (c). All rights reserved.
Please view our disclaimer

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0