Welcome to The FlyingGiants! - please login or click this bar to join our community...

Home About Us Newest Products Special Sales

Please support our sponsors
   

Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!!

Go Back   FlyingGiants Forums > General RC Discussions > The Clubhouse!


The Clubhouse! General RC Related stuff? Whatcha got?

Support our Sponsors

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-30-2006, 07:34 PM   #1 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: No Matter
Posts: 398
OverTemp is offline
Default 40% vs. QQ 102" or Other Stellar 35%

I've been flying 35% for a couple years now. I love IMAC and 3D both. I'm now in a dilemma... I want a winter project (unloading one of my 35%s) and can't decide if I should go 40% or stay with a 35% (most likely a QQ Yak).

40% - More vibes, bigger to move, more electrical requirements, more money, Tim Taylor feeling

35% - Smoother motor, easier to move (I move a lot), easier on servos/batts/etc, less money

If I go 40% I don't want to spend a ton... probably a Radiowave Extra 300 ARF with a DA-150 or a Kroma-180.

Anyone like their 35% ships as much/more than their 40% ships?

Thanks,
Jason
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2006, 07:49 PM   #2 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Mithrandir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: High Desert California, USA
Age: 46
Posts: 1,663
Mithrandir is online now
Default Re: 40% vs. QQ 102" or Other Stellar 35%

35% is a quicker plane... will throw around a lot faster...
40% is smoother.... (And easier to see)

A 4 minute freestyle sequence with a 35%'r would take 5 minutes to do with a 40%....

I understand the J-Tec's are a little heavy...
Consider one of the WildHare 40% Extras... the price is really good too... like $1300.00 I think..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2006, 08:26 PM   #3 (permalink)
Gone huckin'
 
pherchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chatham, ON, Canada
Age: 19
Posts: 27
pherchris is offline
Default Re: 40% vs. QQ 102" or Other Stellar 35%

Jason;

Unload your UglyStick and Extra and get a new 120" QQ Yak with a DA150 when Quique breaks em' out this winter! If it flies anything like Kevin's 102", it'll be hard to beat as a 40% ship.

See ya this weekend,


Chris.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2006, 08:54 PM   #4 (permalink)
Put some Bling on that thing
 
Shawn Berkheimer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Jose CA
Posts: 644
Shawn Berkheimer is offline
Default Re: 40% vs. QQ 102" or Other Stellar 35%

My vote goes for the Aeroworks 40% QB extra 260. I have flown the 35% and it rocks so I expect great things from the 40%. the WH 40% Extra 300 looks pretty good too. If you do more 3D than IMAC I would stick with 35%.

Shawn
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2006, 09:44 AM   #5 (permalink)
Al
 
jtec/radiowave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mooresville, North Carolina
Age: 55
Posts: 263
jtec/radiowave is offline
Default Re: 40% vs. QQ 102" or Other Stellar 35%

Quote: Originally Posted by Mithrandir
35% is a quicker plane... will throw around a lot faster...
40% is smoother.... (And easier to see)

A 4 minute freestyle sequence with a 35%'r would take 5 minutes to do with a 40%....

I understand the J-Tec's are a little heavy...
Consider one of the WildHare 40% Extras... the price is really good too... like $1300.00 I think..
Mithrandir,

You have the wrong information, Our 40%'s are 2800 sq in, and weight in between 38 and 42 pounds depending how its stuffed, Its 125" + wingspan so its one of the largest 40% and lightest per sq in on the market. Most 40% are about 117" wingspan. Ours is caculated as a true 40% to the real planes

By the way you will see at least 3 in the upcoming MASTERS at Triple Tree this year.

Al Young
JTEC/RADIOWAVE
__________________
JTEC/RADIOWAVE
Airplanes, Mufflers, & Accessories
www.jtecrc.com
www.desertaircraft.com
TEAM FUTABA
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2006, 09:48 AM   #6 (permalink)
Thanks for the Support!
 
SleepyC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Age: 37
Posts: 14,004
SleepyC is offline
Awards Showcase
FlyingGiants Good Dude Award: For stepping up to the plate, being a part of a fundraising effort for a good cause. Thank you. - Issue reason: Thank you very much for helping with the recent donation drive.  Brass Balls Award: For having sack.. - Issue reason: For having the SACK to photochop two of the most respected names in the hobby into precarious photographs. See http://www.flyinggiants.com/forums/showthread.php?p=90555  Platinum Diamond Studed Steaming Fabergé Turd: The SleepyC award. Enough said. - Issue reason: Because you, Sleepy, are a triple Platinum Daimond Studed Steaming Faberge Turd! In a good way of course! LOL! 300+ post thread, and took it like a man! 
Total Awards: 3
Default Re: 40% vs. QQ 102" or Other Stellar 35%

And let me add to Al that the 35% Panzl he offers is NOT by any means a HEAVY plane.
I just flew mine with an FPE 5.8 (95cc) motor and it was insane... and it floats like a feather.. I'll have to weigh it... but it is in no way a "HEAVY" plane!!!
__________________
Get the most current up-to-date R/C modeling news:
www.flyinggiants.com
www.rcgroups.com
www.crackroll.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2006, 11:00 AM   #7 (permalink)
Doo It! Doo It!
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washingtonville,New York
Age: 63
Posts: 95
BiggD is offline
Default Re: 40% vs. QQ 102" or Other Stellar 35%

OverTemp

Have both, cannot agree with you more, Having more fun with the 35%'er , easyer to transport and alot easyer on the wallet !

Bigg D
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2006, 11:14 AM   #8 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 982
T. Bob is offline
Awards Showcase
FlyingGiants TBob Award!: Much coveted award for providing continued excellence in forum posting. - Issue reason: Excellence in forum posting! You are the proud recipient of the much coveted Tbob award!  FlyingGiants Good Dude Award: For stepping up to the plate, being a part of a fundraising effort for a good cause. Thank you. - Issue reason: Thank you very much for helping with the recent donation drive. 
Total Awards: 2
Default Re: 40% vs. QQ 102" or Other Stellar 35%

40% all the way.
They fly sooooo much slower and will make you look like a champ.
Ass for a plane get a Carden and if don't want to build and who does keep your eyes out for a used one. You have some time before the next season and you wont be disappointed.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2006, 12:05 PM   #9 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Mithrandir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: High Desert California, USA
Age: 46
Posts: 1,663
Mithrandir is online now
Default Re: 40% vs. QQ 102" or Other Stellar 35%

Quote: Originally Posted by jtec/radiowave
Mithrandir,

...... and weight in between 38 and 42 pounds depending how its stuffed,
Al Young
JTEC/RADIOWAVE
What is a typical weight with say...

DA150 and Std Muffs
Two 4400 Fromeco Li-Ion Packs with 2 Regs,
One 2000 NiMh Ign Pack
Two Rx's
and a typical suite of servos

My SX (I think it is about 122" and 2700'ish wing area) tips the scales at 39 pounds dry with a Seiko Rudder servo and 3 cell LiPo 1320 pack.....
It flies lightly on the wing... but so did my 42% Ulty... it has 3300 sq's ... but is too heavy for a DA150.....

At my altitude.... 42 pounds is just about the upper limit for a DA150.....
So if you guys over there at JTEC/RADIOWAVE can refine the design and hone a few more pounds out, at the price you are selling them... this model would become a true contender for me.. (And the altitude I fly at and the temperatures I fly at)
I have seen some SMOKIN Deals on used JTEC's.... but I was concerned about the AUW's....

Last edited by Mithrandir; 08-31-2006 at 12:26 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2006, 12:27 PM   #10 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin
Age: 37
Posts: 239
innovator is offline
Default Re: 40% vs. QQ 102" or Other Stellar 35%

A JTEC 40% extra to accomodate both Imac and 3D. The Panzl will do both as well in the 35% range. The Panzl is probably the most fun plane I have had. If you can do it, it can too.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2006, 01:09 PM   #11 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: No Matter
Posts: 398
OverTemp is offline
Default Re: 40% vs. QQ 102" or Other Stellar 35%

Lucky me... I do have a Panzl!!! I do LOVE it!!! It's not going anywhere any time soon... will likely fly it until the wings fall off!!! As for weight, it came in at the same weight as the AW 260QB that everyone loves (when set up with a DA-100 like my Panzl).

Just looking for the perfect airplane to compliment it. I really don't want a super expensive airframe (Carden, Dalton, etc)... they all burn eventually and I may be looking for a new job in the near future... there will be a couple year period with less income than I have right now. Heck... at this moment I don't even know if I'll be able to fit a 40% in my next house!!! (don't wanna leave it out in the trailer all the time in the super hot summers).

Can blame a guy for doing early research!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2006, 10:18 AM   #12 (permalink)
Al
 
jtec/radiowave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mooresville, North Carolina
Age: 55
Posts: 263
jtec/radiowave is offline
Default Re: 40% vs. QQ 102" or Other Stellar 35%

Sleepy,

send pictures for the website. I'd love to see how that 95 pulls, Have fun and keep us upto date on it

Al
__________________
JTEC/RADIOWAVE
Airplanes, Mufflers, & Accessories
www.jtecrc.com
www.desertaircraft.com
TEAM FUTABA
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
QQ Yak 102" GIII Sukhoikid Git 'R Dun - Giant Scale! 118 06-24-2008 11:27 AM
QQ 102" Yak 54 MickDK QuiQue's Aircraft Support 4 11-12-2007 03:03 PM
QQ 102" Yak GEN III Sukhoikid General Discussions - Giant Scale 0 05-26-2007 08:50 PM
SD 35% Yak-54 or QQ 102" storklappe Giant Scale Airframes and Kits 11 02-25-2007 11:23 AM
how much will it cost? QQ 102" GremlinX Giant Scale Airframes and Kits 14 06-30-2006 09:13 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08 AM.


  Sitemap :: Contact Us :: Community :: News :: Videos and Photos :: About Us
FlyingGiants, and The Leading Edge, are trademarks of RCGroups.com LLC. All content (c). All rights reserved.
Please view our disclaimer

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0