Welcome to The FlyingGiants! - please login or click this bar to join our community...

Infinite Menus, Copyright 2006, OpenCube Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Please support our sponsors
   

Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!!

Go Back   FlyingGiants Forums > General RC Discussions > Full Scale Huckin'!

Full Scale Huckin'! Discussions about full scale aircraft huckin'! Talk about it here!

Support our Sponsors

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-14-2006, 11:02 PM   #1 (permalink)
PAU EDGE 540!!!!
 
harv's Avatar
 
harv's Stuff
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: canada
Age: 16
Posts: 723
harv is offline
View Photos and Videos
Default question for matt

hi guys. i was just wondering, does the full scale cap 232 have dehedrial in the wing or is it flat(no dehedrial)??
\




harv
__________________
HARVANATOR


----------------------------------------------------
Borderline IMAC Team
www.performancercaircraft.com
asskicking 30% PAU edge 540
42% SD Extra 260
  <--Lame Post Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006, 11:07 PM   #2 (permalink)
Rollin', Rollin', and Rollin'
 
TonyThomasian's Avatar
 
TonyThomasian's Stuff
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tigard,Oregon
Age: 16
Posts: 2,094
TonyThomasian is offline
View Photos and Videos
Default Re: question for matt

It looks like it does have dehedrial.... from looking at these pics.... http://www.france-voltige.org/Photos/cap232_paris_1.jpg

http://pierphoto.free.fr/galeriesgen...col/_00003.jpg

http://www.nak.no/motor/foto/cap232-stor.jpg
__________________
Fromeco.org

ExtremeFlightrc.com
  <--Lame Post Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 08:17 PM   #3 (permalink)
PAU EDGE 540!!!!
 
harv's Avatar
 
harv's Stuff
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: canada
Age: 16
Posts: 723
harv is offline
View Photos and Videos
Default Re: question for matt

it looks like it does, but very little.
__________________
HARVANATOR


----------------------------------------------------
Borderline IMAC Team
www.performancercaircraft.com
asskicking 30% PAU edge 540
42% SD Extra 260
  <--Lame Post Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 08:23 PM   #4 (permalink)
team aero graphix
 
maeu2003's Stuff
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 383
maeu2003 is offline
View Photos and Videos
Default Re: question for matt

its weird seeing my name in the title of a thread. i kinda freaked seeing it.
  <--Lame Post Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 08:35 PM   #5 (permalink)
Too many Splats? NEVER!
 
Matt Chapman's Avatar
 
Matt Chapman's Stuff
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: kennett square
Age: 48
Posts: 335
Matt Chapman is offline
View Photos and Videos
Default Re: question for matt

the wing has what is called a double taper.
the wing gets thinner towards the tip, so the taper is what is making it look like dihedrail, but the top of the wing is flat across, and the bottom wing comes "up" . Kind of like buildinga wing up-side-down flat on the board. Does that make sence?

Last edited by Matt Chapman : 11-21-2006 at 09:02 PM.
  <--Lame Post Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 11:59 PM   #6 (permalink)
Tony Quist
 
Rolling Thunder's Avatar
 
Rolling Thunder's Stuff
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Glendale, AZ
Age: 44
Posts: 1,172
Rolling Thunder is online now
View Photos and Videos
Default Re: question for matt

The wing on the Midwest Cap and Extra are built just like that. I believe the radiowave 300 is also this way.
  <--Lame Post Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2006, 12:06 AM   #7 (permalink)
Patriotic Liberal
 
Judge's Avatar
 
Judge's Stuff
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SOCAL, CA
Age: 52
Posts: 957
Judge is offline
View Photos and Videos
Default Re: question for matt

Quote: Originally Posted by Matt Chapman
View Post
the wing has what is called a double taper.
the wing gets thinner towards the tip, so the taper is what is making it look like dihedrail, but the top of the wing is flat across, and the bottom wing comes "up" . Kind of like buildinga wing up-side-down flat on the board. Does that make sence?
Most all pattern planes back in the 60's and 70's were built the same way. We called it "effective dihedral". Built them just like Matt says, upside down on a flat board.
__________________
******************
Team Futaba

Don't believe a word I say.
I get free shirts!!!
  <--Lame Post Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2006, 12:44 AM   #8 (permalink)
Sleepy's step and fetch
 
Toro's Avatar
 
Toro's Stuff
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chino Hills, California
Age: 36
Posts: 2,232
Blog Entries: 1
Toro is offline
View Photos and Videos
Awards Showcase
Wesse's Haaard Man Award!: For showing our community the joy of eating jap-a-lin-os and being a haaaard man! Wesse Power! - Issue reason: You're a haaaaaaard man! 
Total Awards: 1
Default Re: question for matt

Quote: Originally Posted by Judge
View Post
Most all pattern planes back in the 60's and 70's were built the same way. We called it "effective dihedral". Built them just like Matt says, upside down on a flat board.

Bill,

you remember the 60's ?

love ya...
  <--Lame Post Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2006, 10:33 AM   #9 (permalink)
Uber Contributer
 
teryn's Stuff
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Age: 35
Posts: 163
teryn is offline
View Photos and Videos
Default Re: question for matt

[airfoil] "thickness taper" is what you are referring too (proper terminology). the other taper has to do with the chord.

Dihedral produces a rolling moment in the presence of a sideslide. I am surprised that there is no dihedral on this plane. I wonder if thickness taper still contributes to the dihedral effect.

Quote: Originally Posted by Matt Chapman
View Post
the wing has what is called a double taper.
the wing gets thinner towards the tip, so the taper is what is making it look like dihedrail, but the top of the wing is flat across, and the bottom wing comes "up" . Kind of like buildinga wing up-side-down flat on the board. Does that make sence?

Last edited by teryn : 11-22-2006 at 11:32 AM.
  <--Lame Post Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2006, 03:43 PM   #10 (permalink)
Too many Splats? NEVER!
 
Matt Chapman's Avatar
 
Matt Chapman's Stuff
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: kennett square
Age: 48
Posts: 335
Matt Chapman is offline
View Photos and Videos
Default Re: question for matt

Dihedral make the plane more stable. Something we don't want in an aerobatic plane. Keep in mind we also fly inverted and ou don;t want to be fighting dihedral while inverted.
On a Cessna the dihedral will allow the rudder to keep the wings level and even roll in and out of turns. On a CAP, Extra, Suke ect. you can't, nor do you want to do that. However; on Extra's, a certified plane the spades are tipped. This will creat a slight movement in roll giving you the ability to keep the wings level, or get out of a spin and return to level. (required for FAA certification)
Just some basic info for those who care.
MC
  <--Lame Post Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2006, 06:02 PM   #11 (permalink)
Uber Contributer
 
teryn's Stuff
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Age: 35
Posts: 163
teryn is offline
View Photos and Videos
Default Re: question for matt

Matt, you are correct. I thought that there would be between 0 and 1 deg at least to offset the roll instability due to the CG being above the wings. Most low wings have this, but of course we don't want the plane to be too stable for aerobatics. Interestingly, the bigger airplanes like the C-5 and C-17 have anhedral in their wings. The purpose of this is to damp out the so-called Dutch Roll mode instability found on some high wing airplanes.

Are the spades those shovel like things that hang down below the wing? I understand that those add a boost to help the pilot move the ailerons udner demanding circumstances.
  <--Lame Post Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2006, 06:25 PM   #12 (permalink)
Too many Splats? NEVER!
 
Matt Chapman's Avatar
 
Matt Chapman's Stuff
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: kennett square
Age: 48
Posts: 335
Matt Chapman is offline
View Photos and Videos
Default Re: question for matt

Yup, the "spade" or "shovel" are a form of "power steering" Without them on my plane at red line (240mph) the stick is very heavy. Two hands needed to move it, and only a little is possable. The way my plane is set up, I can move the stick all the way to the stop at red line with just one finger. I have a strong center, but that is easy to get through, and once out, the rest is very easy. The plates are used to assist in stick forces and centering. By changing the incidence on the plate you can change both stick force, stick centering, break out force and even roll rate. Set them up wrong and you can really have your hands full in the push, or negitive "G".

Again, just my 2c....
  <--Lame Post Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
h9 260 repair question go29kev The Clubhouse! 2 04-14-2008 11:35 AM
Question on my set-up StPeteFlyer In flight power systems 3 11-29-2007 10:42 PM
3W 28CS choke question & Ign. question zzw26n Gas Engines and Power 3 04-10-2007 08:14 PM
Covering Seam question exeter_acres Building, Repair, and The Details - Tips and Tricks 5 02-12-2007 04:54 PM
question on RPM's Mr.E Gas Engines and Power 6 04-20-2006 08:17 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:04 AM.


  Sitemap :: Contact Us :: Community :: News :: Videos and Photos :: About Us
FlyingGiants, and The Leading Edge, are trademarks of RCGroups.com LLC. All content (c). All rights reserved.
Please view our disclaimer

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0