| | ||||||
| | ||||||
Please support our sponsors | ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
| |||||||
| Aerodynamics What makes 'em fly? Designs & technology related to aerodynamics. |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #25 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
| Uber Contributer ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Tucson, AZ, USA Age: 35
Posts: 168
|
Thank you. I am looking forward to this.
| |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| | #26 (permalink) |
| Grad of CrazyGoNuts Univ. ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Oklahoma City, OK Age: 26
Posts: 789
|
Dick- That is the way I understand it as well. My design reduces or completely eliminates the wingtip vortex by providing an opposing force at the leading edge of the wing which forces the air to flow over the cord which will increase lift and reduce drag. My design doesn't use winglets of any sort and is not a new concept by any means but has never been applied to props and materials were not available in the past to handle the higher stress this design imposes on the prop and/or wing. I will try to have the write up tonight, however it does not show my design in an effort to protect it. I will have a document which will need to be signed and mailed or faxed to me which will just ensure the confidentiality needed and that the design belongs to me. At that point I will provide a CAD rendering of my design and contact information so that those who are interested in my design can contact me for further information. I don't have the money or means to produce this design as I don't even have the money for a gas airplane. Thats where the rc companies that are interested come in. If they are interested then I will contract with them to have it produced.
|
|
| | #28 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: murray utah
Posts: 1,376
|
The increased span approach simply is no good on extreme aerobatics -great on gliders tho-- For a highly maneuverable craft and one which will make very short flat turns -- a low aspect ratio is king. I was after stopping spanwise flow - as much as practical -on a short wing th approach is sound -Ihave testesd it (as have others) with the strange looking side force generators they effectively stop the "falling leaf " side to side wagging at high angles of attack - you have to do this experiment to appreciate it I also routinely saw the tips off large ARFS- and lighten them as much as practical - this makes big improvement in snap maneuvers . In this case the tip plates were simply trial to see if any benifit existed . Like giving an enema to a dead horse - it did not seem to hurt anything. |
|
| | #31 (permalink) |
| Uber Contributer ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Tucson, AZ, USA Age: 35
Posts: 168
|
they look OK - maybe a bit sexy - but do they really do anything, and what is the scientific justification for them? At this point it is just a psychological facade put in the eyes of the opponent. I am still not convinced by all these conjectures that are not backed up by any data.
Last edited by teryn; 11-22-2006 at 06:29 PM. |
|
| | #32 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: murray utah
Posts: 1,376
|
Yeh but I am more concerned with data that has no real application. Let me clarify that remark-- I seriously doubt any current texbooks address the aerobatic flying done by such as Peter Besenyie. So unless you have a background in high speed skidding maneuvers etc., I suspect the real value of the devices are simply an unknown. I am not a believer in Voodoo aerodynamics but I have leared -thru experience that the textbook approach to resolving the unknown is often found wanting -- for example - what airfoil is better for flat foamies than the flat airfoil. answer None .-- the flat shape is the best. Why ? -It works best. Last edited by dick hanson; 11-22-2006 at 09:07 PM. |
|
| | #33 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() |
well i have flown these new 4d foamies and until you have you will not believe it - i have also flown a H9 showtime with all the SFG' stuff - amazing how easy a KE becomes and how steady a TR is and the rest - now these things certainly work and soon we will use then on our big planes 100% - theory, well good to know and then you just try the mods until it works or dump it - lol
__________________ My sponsors : Team "Shalat Rachok" Israel Spektrum radios/Horizon Hobbies my blog http://janstrydom.blogspot.com |
|
| | #34 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: murray utah
Posts: 1,376
|
yes that is how it is done in the real world. I had the Showtime with a piped 26 and it really responded better at high AOA, with the panels in place . The learned ideas for a relatively low powered full scale aircraft are really not helpful on a high powered, low wing loading plane which is constantly flying in vectored attitudes. All the correctly stated laws of physics do apply - but much data in the textbooks is simply out of date - When in doubt --test it out - |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 43% Edge 540 ARF Wing Recall/Replacement | islandflyer2 | Performance Aircraft Unlimited (PAU) | 2 | 02-28-2008 06:19 AM |
| Product Spotlight: PAU Edge 36% & 43%! | madmax | Leading Edge Homepage Article Discussions! | 44 | 12-03-2007 07:04 PM |
| H9 33% Edge and 100cc Engine? | Yakov | Gas Engines and Power | 44 | 11-13-2006 09:07 AM |
| Check your carb bolts/BME Edge Fuse needed | Tailwind | General Discussions - Giant Scale | 1 | 08-06-2006 01:00 PM |
| 33% Edge PCM Lockout......... Bye Bye Edge | AirMcNair | The Dumb Thumb & The Funky Chicken | 44 | 01-11-2006 04:26 PM |