| | ||||||
| | ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
| |||||||
| Northwest Northwest Region IMAC Discussions |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #14245 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Vassup! ![]() Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Aloha, Oregon
Posts: 278
|
__________________ "Sometimes when you win, you really lose, and sometimes when you lose, you really win, and sometimes when you win or lose, you actually tie, and sometimes when you tie, you actually win or lose." | ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
| | #14247 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Rocketman ![]() Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Canada Eh? Age: 17
Posts: 1,781
|
Right now i have the servos on pull pull. but i have seen two of them done with direct drive.(custom mod). Reason i sued pull pull is that its the way it came, and the only way to put direct drive is to build your own mount in the tail(from what i see it doesnt seem to difficult). Tell him to look at this build thread on how this guy did it. TOC Performance 40% Extra 260 Build Mnie is with a DA 150, and mtw 110 cans, and the CG is perfect. the batteries are at easy access also. and there are tons of places to put them. Ive flown one with a 150(mine) and one with a 170 (bill fongs) and both are great. my current set up and weight DA 150 MTW 110 cans 2 8711 per aileron 1 per stab 2 on rudder 3 froemco 5200 3 sahara regs Mejlick 28.5x12s 3 blade Mejlick 5 inch spinner Carbon landing gear Carbon tail gear carbon wing and stab tube Total wight WITHOUT fuel is 37.5 lbs total wieght WITH fuel is 40 lbs jsut pm me if you want any other details harv
__________________ ---------------------------------------------------- Borderline IMAC Team Aztech Aero "Bad-ass bling for your planes" SE craft USA | ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
| | #14249 (permalink) |
| Rocketman ![]() Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Canada Eh? Age: 17
Posts: 1,781
|
42% vs 35% from what i know right now 42% extra 260 -slower -more stable -easier to fly -Does all manuvers slower( harrier rolls, snaps, etc) -not on the sticks as much -tracks like an arrow -Minimal knifeedge couplnig in high speed and high alpha 35% extra 260 -much faster than im used to -Not as stable in comparison to my 40% -Way more manuverable -Snaps are crisp but fast -has a really high roll rate -on the sticks more -tracks like an arrow -Minimal knifeedge couplnig in high speed and high alpha Both have great power and fly the planes easily. Im happy with both, although im sitll tryin to get used to the speed of the 35% for freestyle, and im trying to take advantage of having the speed.
__________________ ---------------------------------------------------- Borderline IMAC Team Aztech Aero "Bad-ass bling for your planes" SE craft USA |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| IMAC NW Shirts and hats | catboater | Northwest | 18 | 10-13-2009 07:13 PM |
| Ottawa, Ontario, Canada IMAC Competition | tommy321 | NorthEast | 0 | 03-12-2008 09:03 AM |
| Rising IMAC / Freestyle star. (And all around Good Guy.) | Wayne | Leading Edge Homepage Article Discussions! | 59 | 11-30-2007 04:12 PM |
| 2006 Final IMAC Presidential Update From Wally Pitts | Anna Wood | General IMAC Discussions | 0 | 01-01-2007 08:55 PM |
| 2007 IMAC sequences released | sweetpea | General IMAC Discussions | 24 | 10-10-2006 01:22 AM |