Welcome to The FlyingGiants! - please login or click this bar to join our community...

Home About Us Newest Products Special Sales

Please support our sponsors
   

Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!!

Go Back   FlyingGiants Forums > General RC Product Discussions > 2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology


2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology Discuss Spektrum, Futaba FASST, and all of the exciting 2.4 transmitter/receiver technology here!

Support our Sponsors

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-09-2007, 01:10 AM   #37 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Flyinrazrback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Shreveport LA
Posts: 1,757
Flyinrazrback is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Does the X9303 come with a dsc cord or such to link up 2 9303s to copy models from one to another?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 01:19 AM   #38 (permalink)
Pimpalicious
 
airborneSGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kville, NC
Age: 27
Posts: 1,497
airborneSGT is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Whats the big difference in using the module vs. the ground up system vs. the slight speed penalty? I am curious to see if the dedicated 2.4 works any better in practice than the module.
__________________
Getting R Done since 81!

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 05:42 AM   #39 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Tailwind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New Lenox, IL.
Age: 41
Posts: 383
Tailwind is online now
Awards Showcase
FlyingGiants Good Dude Award: For stepping up to the plate, being a part of a fundraising effort for a good cause. Thank you. - Issue reason: Thank you very much for helping with the recent donation drive. 
Total Awards: 1
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

On the Data logger Instructions they say up to 500 on the ant, and 20 on the frame losses are acceptable numbers.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 10:52 AM   #40 (permalink)
Old Grey Beard Fighter Pilot
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ft Wayne, IN
Age: 46
Posts: 559
GooseF22 is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Just a few thoughts, dont know about validy, just brainstorming....

-Bind it to another transmitter and see if you get drops like you did with this one on the ground.
-try elevating the receiver above the power expander with foam and velcro
-disconnect the rudder servos and range check to see if you are getting any interference from the tray/stacked setup or wiring. PE should filter it.
-were the dropouts on the range check motor off? I assume yes.
-Test at a different location
-Lay the antenna sideways on the TX
-maybe try a nickle pack just for testing and turn off the regulators plugged right into the rx and see
-
i will think about it some more...Im stumped..
g
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 12:56 PM   #41 (permalink)
Stiiiiiiil Huckin'!
 
madmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mexifornia
Age: 36
Posts: 9,233
Blog Entries: 8
madmax is offline
Awards Showcase
The  MAD MAX: This award is for the commitment and dedication put in to  building the Flyinggiants into the amazing site it is today. CHEERS! Now go relax and have a wobbly pop. - Issue reason: This award is for the commitment and dedication put in to building the Flyinggiants into the amazing site it is today. CHEERS! Now go relax and have a wobbly pop.  Wesse's Haaard Man Award!: For showing our community the joy of eating jap-a-lin-os and being a haaaard man! Wesse Power! - Issue reason: You're a haaaaaaard man! 
Total Awards: 2
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Regarding the A,B,L&R fade numbers -- I regularly see up wards of 350 fades per 15 minute flight, varying per antenna. I've been told these numbers are perfectly acceptable, and can be improved through antenna positioning to get the numbers down. Frame loss numbers are acceptable as well. There are millions of frames/packets transfered per flight. Don't get freaked out about that. However the numbers are all closely tied together. This is why diversity antennas are soooooo important with the 2.4 stuff. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise.

You should -never- see a hold, that's not good. Can you post a photo of TA's install?

Steve, push your receiver as far forward as you can get it on the PowerExpander. Get the antenna well in front of the deans connector.

Walex - your setup looks great from a positioning point of view, however I would take a closer look at your battery setup. How many servos are you running? Is that the stock 1500 that came with the 9303?

Brownouts are an issue, and properly powering 2.4 gear is absolutely 100% essential. Inferior ESC's as a receiver power source on electrics can cause big time problems. The reason for the 3-4 second lag after a re-boot is that the receiver is scanning for channels on power up. From my understanding, in the future these systems will "remember" the last channel that a link was established, and immediately re-connect, drastically reducing the power up time in the case of a voltage drop. There are also a few excellent soon to be released products from a couple of manufacturers which will alleviate these issues.

In the past 12 months, I've completely swapped all 72 for 2.4 with zero issues. Just keep 'em powered properly, and you're a-okay.
__________________
Sponsored by Visa, American Express, SLEEPYC, and SnapaSaurus.
Facebook: Maxon Duncan
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 03:07 PM   #42 (permalink)
Old Grey Beard Fighter Pilot
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ft Wayne, IN
Age: 46
Posts: 559
GooseF22 is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

YESSSS. someone listened, hopefully a shock absorber for voltage dips.

excellent points max. I have been stuck over here all summer and havent been able to mess with the 9000 yet with a data logger.....YET... I will be messing with it on my tuna boat this winter and the jet if the $$$holds up.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 03:45 PM   #43 (permalink)
Flyin' Around
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 13
Extra 1 is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Max and others:
I have modified as follows the 2.4 installation in my 260:

Raised the AB receiver up and forward away from the Deans plugs and wire.
Moved and repositioned the L and R satelite receivers.
Will be testing tomorrow and will report results.

Tim Attaway
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 04:51 PM   #44 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
bodywerks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, baby!
Age: 33
Posts: 3,612
bodywerks is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

good deal. Keep us informed.
I, too, have a PE Pro, and I plan to mount the rx on top of about 1.5" of Depron to get the main antennas away from the PE circuit board and Deans plugs. I think that may be a source of your problems right there. I also have decided to ditch regulators to ensure a smooth flow of power.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 06:25 PM   #45 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Flyinrazrback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Shreveport LA
Posts: 1,757
Flyinrazrback is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

I have 150+ flights on my module based 2.4 system in a 9303, split between a dalton 260 and a comp arf mx2. Zero problems with it. I just bought the X9303 to replace it for the extra options and will be swapping it out tommorow and doing some flying with it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 10:52 PM   #46 (permalink)
Stiiiiiiil Huckin'!
 
madmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mexifornia
Age: 36
Posts: 9,233
Blog Entries: 8
madmax is offline
Awards Showcase
The  MAD MAX: This award is for the commitment and dedication put in to  building the Flyinggiants into the amazing site it is today. CHEERS! Now go relax and have a wobbly pop. - Issue reason: This award is for the commitment and dedication put in to building the Flyinggiants into the amazing site it is today. CHEERS! Now go relax and have a wobbly pop.  Wesse's Haaard Man Award!: For showing our community the joy of eating jap-a-lin-os and being a haaaard man! Wesse Power! - Issue reason: You're a haaaaaaard man! 
Total Awards: 2
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Thanks Mr. Attaway! Hope this thread helps. Remember to re-bind that puppy after changing any trimming!

SGT, the native DSM2 stuff is pretty awesome, and noticibly faster when sitting on the ground. The module approach has been a good stopgap during the period of time when we're waiting for the high end 2.4 radios from Futaba and JR to surface. Using the module was kinda like installing Windows Vista on a 3 year old computer. It works great, but you still have the old video card, less than optimal memory, and lower capacity hard drives - it makes you want to upgrade. Horrible analogy, but that's all I got .
__________________
Sponsored by Visa, American Express, SLEEPYC, and SnapaSaurus.
Facebook: Maxon Duncan
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2007, 12:10 AM   #47 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
dick hanson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: murray utah
Posts: 1,432
dick hanson is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Q--why would you rebind after changing the trims on the face of the tx?
A - IF you switch aircraft and leave same model on the tx.-trims as well as all setups ( throws reverse mix etc,,)will have to be changed for another model.-just like an y simple single model type tx.
otherwise --the tx does remember tx face trims just as it did when the 72 module was in it
At least all my 10JR versions and 9303 did.
My DX 7 also does this but -if sub trims are changed after binding - then rebind is advised
did I miss something here?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2007, 12:49 AM   #48 (permalink)
Stiiiiiiil Huckin'!
 
madmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mexifornia
Age: 36
Posts: 9,233
Blog Entries: 8
madmax is offline
Awards Showcase
The  MAD MAX: This award is for the commitment and dedication put in to  building the Flyinggiants into the amazing site it is today. CHEERS! Now go relax and have a wobbly pop. - Issue reason: This award is for the commitment and dedication put in to building the Flyinggiants into the amazing site it is today. CHEERS! Now go relax and have a wobbly pop.  Wesse's Haaard Man Award!: For showing our community the joy of eating jap-a-lin-os and being a haaaard man! Wesse Power! - Issue reason: You're a haaaaaaard man! 
Total Awards: 2
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Mr. Hanson, I'm guilty of posting stuff sometimes when I think everyone else knows the mysterious thoughts in my head when I'm writing. My bad Hope this helps everyone who is reading.

Yes, of course the TX remembers all the trims to make the plane fly straight. But desired failsafe deflection is "learned" by the RX during the binding process. It's important to re-bind after trimming or making mechanical linkage changes so the RX can learn the new "neutral" location of the control surfaces.

Ask Leseberg, he re-binds many times a week.

A word on failsafe. With the 9303, you can now program 2 types of failsafe (covered in our review). These are new features of the AR9000 and RS921 RX's. This is important stuff, and a bit of a learning curve for folks thinking of migrating to 2.4/Spektrum.

- Smartsafe and Pre-set failsafe. Smartsafe throws all servos into "hold" and puts the throttle into a pre-determined failsafe position during loss of comm.

- "Pre-set" failsafe drives all servos into the position they were in when binding occured during loss of comm.

Here's an excerpt from the manual:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg fs.jpg (125.3 KB, 53 views)
__________________
Sponsored by Visa, American Express, SLEEPYC, and SnapaSaurus.
Facebook: Maxon Duncan
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Xtreme Link Experiences Fly3DWithStyle 2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology 1082 05-13-2008 06:35 AM
My XPS JR 9303 flew today Tyler 2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology 39 03-08-2008 09:38 PM
New Field, What would you want at it? Wrench The Clubhouse! 19 12-31-2007 05:37 PM
Best instructions 9303 jr radio BAS Transmitters, receivers, servos & Navigation 0 08-12-2007 01:20 PM
9303 and Spektrum 2.4 help Flyinrazrback 2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology 13 08-11-2007 11:02 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:25 AM.


  Sitemap :: Contact Us :: Community :: News :: Videos and Photos :: About Us
FlyingGiants, and The Leading Edge, are trademarks of RCGroups.com LLC. All content (c). All rights reserved.
Please view our disclaimer

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0