Welcome to The FlyingGiants! - please login or click this bar to join our community...

Home About Us Newest Products Special Sales

Please support our sponsors
   

Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!!

Go Back   FlyingGiants Forums > General RC Product Discussions > 2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology


2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology Discuss Spektrum, Futaba FASST, and all of the exciting 2.4 transmitter/receiver technology here!

Support our Sponsors

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-10-2007, 12:50 AM   #49 (permalink)
Pimpalicious
 
airborneSGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kville, NC
Age: 27
Posts: 1,497
airborneSGT is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Madmax,

Thanks for the heads up; what you are saying makes sense. I think the 12x is what I will wait for. The module in my 9303 will probably be what I use for now to test out setups! Although honestly Windows is a terrible OS and its utilization of the X86 architecture is pathetic. My MAC (which is several years old) would run at the same speed as my latest PC with all the default applications.
__________________
Getting R Done since 81!

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2007, 01:08 AM   #50 (permalink)
Stiiiiiiil Huckin'!
 
madmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mexifornia
Age: 36
Posts: 9,233
Blog Entries: 8
madmax is offline
Awards Showcase
The  MAD MAX: This award is for the commitment and dedication put in to  building the Flyinggiants into the amazing site it is today. CHEERS! Now go relax and have a wobbly pop. - Issue reason: This award is for the commitment and dedication put in to building the Flyinggiants into the amazing site it is today. CHEERS! Now go relax and have a wobbly pop.  Wesse's Haaard Man Award!: For showing our community the joy of eating jap-a-lin-os and being a haaaard man! Wesse Power! - Issue reason: You're a haaaaaaard man! 
Total Awards: 2
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Oh sweet Jeeezus! We have a mac guy among us! I have one to that I use for FCP and the video thing. Please let this be our secret.


A few more excerpts from the manual which are VERY pertinent to this conversation, and worth reading.

Quote:

Advanced Range Testing Using a Flight Log

While the above Standard Range Testing procedure is
recommended for most sport aircraft, for sophisticated
aircraft that contain significant amounts of conductive/
reflective materials (i.e. turbine-powered jets, some types
of scale aircraft, aircraft with carbon fuselages, etc.) the
following advanced range check will confirm that all
internal and remote receivers are operating optimally and
that the installation (position of the receivers) is optimized
for the specific aircraft. This Advanced Range Check
allows the RF performance of each individual internal
and remote receiver to be evaluated and to optimize the
locations of each individual remote receiver.

Advanced Range Testing the X9303 2.4
1. Plug a flight log (optional) into the data port in the JR
R921 receiver and turn on the system (transmitter and
receiver).
2. Advance the Flight Log until F- frame losses are
displayed, by pressing the button on the flight log.
3. Have a helper hold your aircraft while he observes the
Flight Log data.
4. Standing 30 paces away from the model, face the
model with the transmitter in your normal flying
position and depress and hold the bind button on the
back of the transmitter. This causes reduced power
output from the transmitter.
5. Have your helper position the model in various
orientations (nose up, nose down, nose toward the
transmitter, nose away from the transmitter, etc.)
while your helper is watching the Flight Log, noting
any correlation between the aircraft’s orientation and
Frame Losses. Do this for 1 minute. The timer on
the X9303 can be used here. For giant-scale aircraft,
it’s recommended that the airplane be tipped up on
its nose and rotated 360 degrees for one minute,
then record the data. Next place the airplane on its
wheels and do a second test, rotating the aircraft in all
directions for one minute.
6. After one minute, release the bind button. A successful
range check will have recorded zero frame losses.
Scrolling the Flight Log through the Antenna fades
(A, B, L, R) allow you to evaluate the performance
of each receiver. Antenna fades should be relatively
uniform. If a specific antenna is experiencing a high
degree of fades, then that antenna should be moved
to a different location.
7. A successful Advanced test will yield the following:
H- 0 holds
F- 0 frame losses
A, B, R, L- Antenna fades will typically be less than 100.
It’s important to compare the relative antenna fades and
if a particular receiver has a significantly higher antenna
fades (2 to 3X), then the test should be redone, and if
the same results occur, move the offending receiver to a
different location.

Flight Log—Optional for JR R921 Receiver

The Flight Log is compatible with JR R921 receivers. The
Flight Log displays overall RF link performance as well
as the individual internal and external receiver link data.
Additionally it displays receiver voltage.
Using the Flight Log
After a flight and before turning off the receiver or
transmitter, plug the Flight Log into the Data port on the
JR R921 receiver. The screen will automatically display
voltage i.e. 6v2= 6.2 volts.

Note
: When the voltage reaches 4.8 volts or less,
the screen will flash indicating low voltage.
Press the button to display the following information:
A - Antenna fades on internal antenna A
B - Antenna fades on internal antenna B
L - Antenna fades on the left external antenna
R - Antenna fades on the right external antenna
F - Frame loss
H - Holds
Antenna fades—represents the loss of a bit of information
on that specific antenna.
Typically it’s normal to have as many as 50 to 100 antenna
fades during a flight.
If any single antenna experiences over 500 fades in a
single flight, the antenna should be repositioned in the
aircraft to optimize the RF link.
Frame loss—represents simultaneous antenna fades
on all attached receivers. If the RF link is performing
optimally, frame losses per flight should be less that 20.
A hold occurs when 45 continuous (one right after the
other) frame losses occur.
This takes about one second. If a hold occurs during a
flight, it’s important to re-evaluate the system, moving the
antennas to different locations and/or checking to be sure
the transmitter and receivers are all working correctly.
Note


: A servo extension can be used to allow the
Flight Log to more conveniently be plugged in without
having to remove the aircraft’s hatch or canopy. On
some models, the Flight Log can be plugged in,
attached and left on the model using double-sided
tape. This is common with helicopters, mounting the
Flight Log conveniently to the side frame.


Receiver Power System Requirements

With all radio installations, it is vital that the onboard
power system provides adequate power without
interruption to the receiver even when the system is fully
loaded (servos at maximum flight loads). This becomes
especially critical with giant-scale models that utilize
multiple high torque/ high current servos. Inadequate
power systems that are unable to provide the necessary
minimum voltage to the receiver during flight loads have
become the number one cause of in-flight failures. Some
of the power system components that affect the ability
to properly deliver adequate power include: the selected
receiver battery pack (number of cells, capacity, cell type,
state of charge), switch harness, battery leads, regulator
(if used), power bus (if used).
While the R921 receivers’ minimum operational voltage is
3.5-volts, it is highly recommended the system be tested
per the guidelines below to a minimum acceptable voltage
of 4.8-volts during ground testing. This will provide head
room to compensate for battery discharging or if the
actual flight loads are greater than the ground test loads.
Recommended Power System Guidelines
1. When setting up large or complex aircraft with multiple
high torque servos, it’s highly recommended a current
and voltmeter (Hangar 9 HAN172) be used. Plug the
voltmeter in an open channel port in the receiver and
with the system on, load the control surfaces (apply
pressure with your hand) while monitoring the voltage
at the receiver. The voltage should remain above
4.8 volts even when all servos are heavily loaded.
Note
: The optional Flight Log has a built in

voltmeter and it can be used to perform this test.
2. With the current meter inline with the receiver battery
lead, load the control surfaces (apply pressure
with your hand) while monitoring the current. The
maximum continuous recommended current for a
single heavy-duty servo/battery lead is three amps
while short duration current spikes of up to five amps
are acceptable. Consequently, if your system draws
more than three amps continuous or five amps for
short durations, a single battery pack with a single
switch harness plugged into the receiver for power
will be inadequate. It will be necessary to use multiple
packs of the same capacity with multiple switches and
multiple leads plugged into the receiver.
3. If using a regulator, it’s important that the above
tests are done for an extended period of 5 minutes.
When current passes through a regulator, heat is
generated and this heat causes the regulator to
increase resistance, which in turn causes even more
heat to build up (thermal runaway). While a regulator
may provide adequate power for a short duration, it’s
important to test its ability over time as the regulator
may not be able to maintain voltage at significant
power levels.
4. For really large aircraft or complex models (for
example 35% and larger or jets), multiple battery
packs with multiple switch harnesses are necessary
or, in many cases, one of the commercially available
power boxes/ busses is recommended. No matter
what power systems you choose, always carry out test
#1 above making sure that the receiver is constantly
provided with 4.8 volts or more under all conditions.
5. The latest generation of Nickel Metal Hydride batteries
incorporate a new chemistry mandated to be more
environmentally friendly. These batteries, when
charged with peak detection fast chargers, have
tendencies to false peak (not fully charge) repeatedly.
These include all brands of Ni-MH batteries. If using
Ni-MH packs, be especially cautious when charging
making absolutely sure that the battery is fully
charged. It is recommended to use a charger that can
display total charge capacity. Note the number of mAh
put into a discharged pack


__________________
Sponsored by Visa, American Express, SLEEPYC, and SnapaSaurus.
Facebook: Maxon Duncan
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2007, 01:11 AM   #51 (permalink)
Stiiiiiiil Huckin'!
 
madmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mexifornia
Age: 36
Posts: 9,233
Blog Entries: 8
madmax is offline
Awards Showcase
The  MAD MAX: This award is for the commitment and dedication put in to  building the Flyinggiants into the amazing site it is today. CHEERS! Now go relax and have a wobbly pop. - Issue reason: This award is for the commitment and dedication put in to building the Flyinggiants into the amazing site it is today. CHEERS! Now go relax and have a wobbly pop.  Wesse's Haaard Man Award!: For showing our community the joy of eating jap-a-lin-os and being a haaaard man! Wesse Power! - Issue reason: You're a haaaaaaard man! 
Total Awards: 2
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

And be sure to read this section, covers everything we're talking about here:

Quote:
Tip on Using 2.4GHz Systems

While your DSM equipped 2.4GHz system is intuitive to
operate, functioning nearly identically to 72MHz systems,
following are a few common questions from customers:

1. Q: Which do I turn on first, the transmitter or the
receiver?

A: If the receiver is turned on first, all servos except
for the throttle will be driven to their preset fail-safe
positions set during binding. At this time, the throttle
channel doesn’t put out a pulse position preventing
the arming of electronic speed controllers or, in the
case of an engine-powered aircraft, the throttle servo
remains in its current position. When the transmitter is
then turned on, the transmitter scans the 2.4GHz band
and acquires two open channels. Then the receiver that
was previously bound to the transmitter scan the band
and finds the GUID (Globally Unique Identifier code)
stored during binding. The system then connects and
operates normally.

If the transmitter is turned on first, the transmitter
scans the 2.4GHz band and acquires two open
channels. When the receiver is then turned on for a
short period (the time it takes to connect), all servos
except for the throttle are driven to their preset
fail-safe positions while the throttle has no output
pulse; The receiver scans the 2.4GHz band looking
for the previously stored GUID; and when it locates
the specific GUID code and confirms uncorrupted
repeatable packet information the system connects and
normal operation takes place. Typically this takes 2 to
6 seconds.

2. Q: Sometimes the system takes longer to connect and
sometimes it doesn’t connect at all?

A: In order for the system to connect (after the receiver
is bound) the receiver must receive a large number of
continuous (one after the other) uninterrupted perfect
packets from the transmitter in order to connect. This
process is purposely critical of the environment,
ensuring that it’s safe to fly when the system does
connect. If the transmitter is too close to the receiver
(less that 4 feet) or if the transmitter is located near
metal objects (metal transmitter case, the bed of a truck,
the top of a metal work bench, etc.) connection will take
longer, and in some cases, connection will not occur
as the system is receiving reflected 2.4GHz energy
from itself and is interpreting this and unfriendly noise.
Moving the system away from metal objects or moving
the transmitter away from the receiver and powering
the system up again will cause a connection to occur.
This only happens during the initial connection. Once
connected, the system is locked-in and, should a
loss of signal occur (fail-safe), the system connects
immediately (4ms) when signal is regained.
G-26

3. Q: I’ve heard that the DSM system is less tolerant of
low voltage. Is that correct?

A: All DSM receivers have an operational voltage range
of 3.5 to 9 volts. With most systems, this is not a
problem as most servos cease to operate at around
3.8 volts. When using multiple high current draw
servos with a single or inadequate battery/power
source, heavy momentary loads can cause the
voltage to dip below this 3.5-volt threshold, causing
the entire system (servos and receiver) to brown
out. When the voltage drops below the low voltage
threshold (3.5 volts), the DSM receiver must reboot
(go through the start-up process of scanning the band
and finding the transmitter) and this can take several
seconds. Please read the receiver power requirement
on page G-24 as this explains how to test for and
prevent this occurrence.

4. Q: Sometimes my receiver loses its bind and won’t
connect, requiring rebinding. What happens if the bind
is lost in flight?

A: The receiver will never lose its bind unless it’s
instructed to. It’s important to understand that during
the binding process the receiver not only learns the
GUID (code) of the transmitter but the transmitter
learns and stores the type of receiver that it’s bound to.
If the bind button on the transmitter is pressed at any
time and the transmitter is turned on, the transmitter
looks for the binding protocol signal from a receiver.
If no signal is present, the transmitter no longer has
the correct information to connect to a specific receiver
and in essence the transmitter has been “unbound”
from the receiver. We’ve had several customers that
use transmitter stands or trays that unknowingly
depress the bind button and the system is then turned
on, losing the necessary information to allow the
connection to take place. We’ve also had customers
that didn’t fully understand the range test process
and pushed the bind button before turning on the
transmitter, also causing the system to “lose its bind.”
If, when turning on, the system fails to connect, one of
the following has occurred:

• The wrong model has been selected in the model
memory (Model Match).
• The transmitter is near conductive material
(transmitter case, truck bed, etc.) and the reflected
2.4GHz energy is preventing the system from
connecting (see #2 above).
• The bind button was unknowingly (or knowingly)
depressed and the transmitter was turned on
previously, causing the transmitter to no longer
recognize the receiver.

5. Q: Can I use a 3-cell Li-Po pack in my transmitter

A: No. All current JR and Spektrum transmitters are
designed to operate using a 9.6-volt transmitter pack.
A fully charged 3-cell Li-Po pack puts out 12.6 volts.
This higher voltage can overload the power-regulating
transistor causing damage and or failure, possibly
in flight. Many of our customers have experienced
failures using 3-cell Li-Po packs and their use in JR
and Spektrum transmitters is highly advised against.
The X9303 2.4 system will operate for over 15 hours
using a 2700mAh Ni-MH battery.

6. Q: How important is it that I test my system using a
flight log?

A: For most sport airplanes and helicopters, the use
of the flight log is unnecessary. For sophisticated
aircraft, especially those that have significant
conductive materials within the airframe (i.e. jets,
scale airplanes, etc.), the Flight Log offers an extra
measure of confidence that all radio components are
working optimally. The Flight Log is an important
tool that allows the confirmation that the installation
(position of the internal and remote receivers relative
to the conductive materials in the aircraft) is optimized
and that the RF (radio) link is operating at the highest
levels of performance.
__________________
Sponsored by Visa, American Express, SLEEPYC, and SnapaSaurus.
Facebook: Maxon Duncan
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2007, 09:09 AM   #52 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
dick hanson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: murray utah
Posts: 1,432
dick hanson is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

[quote=madmax;297838]Mr. Hanson, I'm guilty of posting stuff sometimes when I think everyone else knows the mysterious thoughts in my head when I'm writing. My bad Hope this helps everyone who is reading.


Ask Leseberg, he re-binds many times a week.


-rebinding won't hurt -- Mark was here Saturday - but this never came up--
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2007, 05:35 PM   #53 (permalink)
Flyin' Around
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 13
Extra 1 is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Today, Monday the 10th I made some changes and this is what I found.
review: Carden 260 40 % new 9303 2.4 continuing test results.
Raised JR 921...relocated / reorientation of L and R
A B L R F H
Range chk 35 0 0 0 0 0 New locations
__________________________________________________ ________
4min flt 197 339 340 301 80 0 New locations
(aggressive flying)___________________________________________ _
14 m flt 255 761 462 485 122 0 New loca. angle ex ant
(unlim fly)______________________________________________ ______
11 min flt 190 232 313 120 22 0 Orig loca. angle ex ant
(softer flying)___________________________________________ ______
Conclusion: Play around with orientation/angles/placement as they suggest.
Tim.....Not sure I like the feel any better than old system.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2007, 06:10 PM   #54 (permalink)
Old Grey Beard Fighter Pilot
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ft Wayne, IN
Age: 46
Posts: 559
GooseF22 is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

OMG. Mac guys amongst us? oh well......me 3..of em.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2007, 11:09 PM   #55 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Flyinrazrback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Shreveport LA
Posts: 1,757
Flyinrazrback is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

I just swapped out my 9303 with the module and AR 9000 rx for the X9303 and 921. Simple swap, the only thing I was surprised at is that all my centers were off a bit than before, not sure the cause of that.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2007, 12:32 AM   #56 (permalink)
Flyin' Around
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Canton,Ohio
Posts: 6
walex is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Madmax,
Thanks for replying. I'm running 6 servos: 4 DS821's, 1 HS-645MG for rudder, 1 BMS-621MG for throttle. My battery
is 5 cell AA NiMH 2300mAh pack. I have the standard JR heavy duty on/off switch. How does that sound?

1bwana1,
I'll check out the data logger. I guess that's something that rides along in the plane?

walex
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2007, 11:43 AM   #57 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
bodywerks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, baby!
Age: 33
Posts: 3,612
bodywerks is online now
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

It doesn't have to. Juts run an extension out of the data port to the outside of the plane and plug the logger into it after a flight/range check and before shutting the rx off.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2007, 06:35 PM   #58 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Flyinrazrback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Shreveport LA
Posts: 1,757
Flyinrazrback is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Went out today and got 4 flights on the new X9303. Range check was flawless, and the radio worked great in the air without a hiccup. Noticeably faster than the module based version I was flying and it did feel more crisp and locked in. Impressed so far and still glad to be running 2.4
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2007, 08:45 PM   #59 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
bodywerks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, baby!
Age: 33
Posts: 3,612
bodywerks is online now
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Here's my solution for keeping the main rx antenna away from any metal, electronics, or other signal absorbing media. Yes, the fuel tank is 4" in front of it, but fuel doesn't block out signals, water does - at least that is what I have read. this added a whopping 2.6 grams...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg powerexpndrinstall.jpg (175.9 KB, 143 views)
File Type: jpg powerexpndrinstall2.jpg (245.5 KB, 175 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2007, 09:02 PM   #60 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
1bwana1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: La Jolla, CA USA
Posts: 1,443
1bwana1 is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Nice idea Nick, it should help a lot. Considering that power is such a big issue with this RX, and we need to keep the antennas away from things, what we really need are power expanders designed purposely for this RX.
  Reply With Quote
Reply