Welcome to The FlyingGiants! - please login or click this bar to join our community...

Home About Us Newest Products Special Sales

Please support our sponsors
   

Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!!

Go Back   FlyingGiants Forums > General RC Product Discussions > 2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology


2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology Discuss Spektrum, Futaba FASST, and all of the exciting 2.4 transmitter/receiver technology here!

Support our Sponsors

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-18-2007, 09:35 PM   #85 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Pale Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,296
Pale Rider is online now
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Would this setup work on the R921 rx ? This would be on a 35% plane 4 aileron servos (2 on each port connected with a Y)
1 Aileron
2 Aileron
3 Elevator
4 Elevator
5 Thro
6 Rudder
7 Kill
8 Bat 1
9 Bat 2
__________________
Some people are only alive because its illegal to shoot them.
_____
Joe
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2007, 09:42 PM   #86 (permalink)
A fifth of Peter.
 
Eury's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ankeny, IA USA
Age: 32
Posts: 769
Eury is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Sure, but you don't need to Y your ailerons, throw them on the 2 unused channels. The R921 rx the X9303 comes with has 2 battery ports, just plug your batts into those.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2007, 09:44 PM   #87 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Pale Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,296
Pale Rider is online now
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Quote: Originally Posted by Eury
View Post
Sure, but you don't need to Y your ailerons, throw them on the 2 unused channels. The R921 rx the X9303 comes with has 2 battery ports, just plug your batts into those.
Oh really ? I dont have one yet--only looked at a small picture--Ill have to look for a better pic of one--that would be perfect! no Y's at all!

edit--Im using 4 aileron servos total--2 per wing so that wouldnt work
__________________
Some people are only alive because its illegal to shoot them.
_____
Joe

Last edited by Pale Rider; 09-18-2007 at 09:59 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2007, 11:19 PM   #88 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
bodywerks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, baby!
Age: 33
Posts: 3,612
bodywerks is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

You can't assign channels 1-4 to be anything other than throt, ail, elev, rudd - in that order - so your scenario won't work.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2007, 11:23 PM   #89 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
bodywerks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, baby!
Age: 33
Posts: 3,612
bodywerks is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Here's my install in a 35% Extra 260 with CF prop, spinner, wing tube, and pipes:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg spektrum1.jpg (302.9 KB, 103 views)
File Type: jpg spektrum2.jpg (240.4 KB, 66 views)
File Type: jpg spektrum3.jpg (181.9 KB, 90 views)
File Type: jpg spektrum4.jpg (211.5 KB, 61 views)

Last edited by bodywerks; 09-18-2007 at 11:33 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 07:10 AM   #90 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Pale Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,296
Pale Rider is online now
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Quote: Originally Posted by bodywerks
View Post
You can't assign channels 1-4 to be anything other than throt, ail, elev, rudd - in that order - so your scenario won't work.
Yea I do know that--I was just numbering for the sake of seeing how many ports there are total--not necessarily in that order..
__________________
Some people are only alive because its illegal to shoot them.
_____
Joe
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 07:15 AM   #91 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Pale Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,296
Pale Rider is online now
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Quote: Originally Posted by bodywerks
View Post
Here's my install in a 35% Extra 260 with CF prop, spinner, wing tube, and pipes:
Great ideas there! I will certainly be using some of them in my Yak

Horizon just changed their "expected" date from Late Sept to early October
__________________
Some people are only alive because its illegal to shoot them.
_____
Joe

Last edited by Pale Rider; 09-19-2007 at 07:33 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 07:47 AM   #92 (permalink)
Gettin' Lower!
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 54
Robin is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Anyone using the AR 9000 in a comp arf plane? I've been struggling to find good locations for the rxs in my 3M classic Extra even have the main rx mounted way up high in the canopy space and still getting relatively high fades. Have over 10 hours with smaller 50cc size no problems only some observations to pass on.
Tx by the way is a PCM 10 with the spektrum module and UK version so less power output than you guys
What is the power output of the American sets? UK is 100mw.

The A rx seems to max out at 255 never seen more even when the B has logged much higher.

Generaly getting frame losses of 20 or less on 10 min flights with every 4th or 5th logging much higher up to 86 frames lost worst case no holds, yet!

These high readings have also been seen following low ones even when the tx has not been turned of in between flights ie its still locked onto the same channels so no chance of having "picked" a noisy channel, the rx being reset in between.

As yet I've not had the confidence to fly the big extra with this kit after the initial high readings until I get some more experience and a definitive guidline as to what frame losses are acceptable/unacceptable the manual is vague to say the least.

Idealy the logger would record faes and frames vs time so we could see just how far apart the dropped frames are, could be my 86 were spread evenly over 10 mins in which case fine. Also seems the main rxs with half aerials seem to get more than twice the fades so might be good if they came out with full aerials like the remotes and even had only one rx in the main body with 3 remotes giving us much more options in the more difficult setups.

Finaly any one able to tell how long one can have the remote extension cable I'm aware that spektrum sell 36" as a max however it would be nice to try a remote rx say at the top of my extras fin away from any carbon.

cheers
Robin
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 08:23 AM   #93 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Flyinrazrback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Shreveport LA
Posts: 1,757
Flyinrazrback is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Robin, if you look back in this thread a bit your will see a pic of my install in my comp arf mx2. Works great, not a single issue. I am using one short remote antenna on the side of the fuse next to the main rx, and a 18" long satellite rx back on the opposite side of the fuse.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 08:54 AM   #94 (permalink)
Gettin' Lower!
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 54
Robin is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Many thanks, missed that.
Any chance you could post some typical fades and frame losses with times please?
cheers
Robin
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 07:08 PM   #95 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Pale Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,296
Pale Rider is online now
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

What about mounting one of the satellite rx's on the outside of the fuse in a pipe tunnel ? (of course if using a pipe this wont work)---would that help in reception?
__________________
Some people are only alive because its illegal to shoot them.
_____
Joe
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 08:33 PM   #96 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
bodywerks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, baby!
Age: 33
Posts: 3,612
bodywerks is offline
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Flew my 35%er with the 9303 today. 360° range check yielded a maximum of like 13 fades on one rx, and only a handful on the remaining ones. Of course, zero frame losses and zero fades over the course of just over one minute.
First flight was about 5 minutes, and included some point rolls, hammerheads, snaps, loops, and a full circle out in front of me. Max fades on one antenna was like 27, all others were in the teens. I did have one lost frame, but zero holds. I think this is quite satisfactory! Plane felt smooooooooooth in the air, and totally locked in.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Xtreme Link Experiences Fly3DWithStyle 2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology 1082 05-13-2008 06:35 AM
My XPS JR 9303 flew today Tyler 2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology 39 03-08-2008 09:38 PM
New Field, What would you want at it? Wrench The Clubhouse! 19 12-31-2007 05:37 PM
Best instructions 9303 jr radio BAS Transmitters, receivers, servos & Navigation 0 08-12-2007 01:20 PM
9303 and Spektrum 2.4 help Flyinrazrback 2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology 13 08-11-2007 11:02 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:46 AM.


  Sitemap :: Contact Us :: Community :: News :: Videos and Photos :: About Us
FlyingGiants, and The Leading Edge, are trademarks of RCGroups.com LLC. All content (c). All rights reserved.
Please view our disclaimer

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0