Welcome to The FlyingGiants! - please login or click this bar to join our community...

Home About Us Newest Products Special Sales

Please support our sponsors
   

Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!!

Go Back   FlyingGiants Forums > General RC Product Discussions > 2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology


2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology Discuss Spektrum, Futaba FASST, and all of the exciting 2.4 transmitter/receiver technology here!

Support our Sponsors

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-08-2008, 08:00 PM   #253 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
jonkoppisch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mobile Alabama
Posts: 572
jonkoppisch is offline
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Doesn't really matter who has the highest, not a contest. It's a matter of what they report the problem to be. That qualifies spektrum and xps. So far, I don't believe futaba has reported voltage being a problem. They probably wont due to them having a failsafe setting for battery voltage...
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 08:10 PM   #254 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Pale Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,296
Pale Rider is online now
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Quote: Originally Posted by jonkoppisch
View Post
Doesn't really matter who has the highest, not a contest. It's a matter of what they report the problem to be. That qualifies spektrum and xps. So far, I don't believe futaba has reported voltage being a problem. They probably wont due to them having a failsafe setting for battery voltage...
Not saying its a contest but since everybody else makes it one I was just curious about how close they are now..
__________________
Some people are only alive because its illegal to shoot them.
_____
Joe
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 08:12 PM   #255 (permalink)
So true
 
sweetpea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Whidbey Island, WA
Age: 33
Posts: 4,645
sweetpea is online now
Awards Showcase
Official FG Bad Ass!: Hand selected award for being a BAD-ASS member, and an awesome dude in general. - Issue reason: For helping put on the 2007 FlyingGiants Las Vegas Huckfest, and being an essential friend of The Giants! 
Total Awards: 1
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Quote: Originally Posted by Pale Rider
View Post
How does it compare now after they redesigned the rx's ?
I don't think Spektrum changed their cutoff voltage( I need to research that), only once it does cutoff the system looks for the last 2 channels and the reboot time has decreased. So that is more inline with the other two.

Quote: Originally Posted by jonkoppisch
View Post
Doesn't really matter who has the highest, not a contest. It's a matter of what they report the problem to be. That qualifies spektrum and xps. So far, I don't believe futaba has reported voltage being a problem. They probably wont due to them having a failsafe setting for battery voltage...

None of this is a contest. Just specs about each system. Futaba may not have reports because it was out way after all the battery issues and now its more common knowledge from everyone freaking out online about it.

Do you know how long the system is in failsafe when the low cutoff is hit? If its long enough you may crash anyways.

Voltage is an issue on all 3 systems. But Spektrum so far has the worst voltage issue. Something electric fliers might like to know before they purchase a system.

I know you now hate XPS but try to look at the specs and be objective. We are trying to educate people (at least that is what Xjet set out to do, right?) about the pros and cons of each system.

If I were FASST I'd say my pro is the lowest cutoff voltage. But it still has one, doesn't matter if the RX goes failsafe or goes crazy or shut downs....you still have no control of your aircraft. So its a con.....but a pro over the other 2.
__________________
___SPONSORS____________________My Home Field_____


___________
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 08:18 PM   #256 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
jonkoppisch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mobile Alabama
Posts: 572
jonkoppisch is offline
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

I'm being fair!! You lumped that onto spektrum and not xps when xps claims that it's a problem as well... Seems it's the same for both.. I definitely am influenced by what has personally happened!!!! & with jd's exaggerations well.... But still, fair is fair!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 08:18 PM   #257 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Pale Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,296
Pale Rider is online now
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Quote: Originally Posted by sweetpea
View Post
I don't think Spektrum changed their cutoff voltage( I need to research that), only once it does cutoff the system looks for the last 2 channels and the reboot time has decreased. So that is more inline with the other two.
Ok that makes sense--I dont think they lowered it either--just a faster reboot time. I think a lot of the problems were/are with the electric setups. Ive never let my batteries get anywhere remotely close to even 5v under a load.
__________________
Some people are only alive because its illegal to shoot them.
_____
Joe
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 08:21 PM   #258 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
dick hanson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: murray utah
Posts: 1,432
dick hanson is online now
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

[quote=sweetpea;365412]I don't think Spektrum changed their cutoff voltage( I need to research that), only once it does cutoff the system looks for the last 2 channels and the reboot time has decreased. So that is more inline with the other two.
Voltage is an issue on all 3 systems. But Spektrum so far has the worst voltage issue. Something electric fliers might like to know before they purchase a system.


I have heard this over n over -- but in actual practice
don't see it and I have a LOT of electric setups 6100/6100E /6200/7000rx and with quite a variety of ESC/ battery (LiPo and A123 ) power setups
I will say - Spektrum being first on the scene got the brunt of the learning curve (some have never learned tho) so natcherly they got the "the sky is falling" comments--- over n over n over
Having seen other brands of 2.4 operate - it appears to me - if you do it all correctly - the results are the same

Because Spektrum still is the only one haveing itsy bitsy rx - they will -(bet money) continue to be the leader in small electrics.
I simply can not get any of my electrics to fail ---
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 08:37 PM   #259 (permalink)
So true
 
sweetpea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Whidbey Island, WA
Age: 33
Posts: 4,645
sweetpea is online now
Awards Showcase
Official FG Bad Ass!: Hand selected award for being a BAD-ASS member, and an awesome dude in general. - Issue reason: For helping put on the 2007 FlyingGiants Las Vegas Huckfest, and being an essential friend of The Giants! 
Total Awards: 1
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Quote: Originally Posted by jonkoppisch
View Post
I'm being fair!! You lumped that onto spektrum and not xps when xps claims that it's a problem as well... Seems it's the same for both.. I definitely am influenced by what has personally happened!!!! & with jd's exaggerations well.... But still, fair is fair!!
I'm done arguing this point.

Spektrum has the worst cutoff voltage...period. That was the point of including it in spektrums problems and not the others. I was trying to make the point if you put the systems in the same plane with same gear.....what would fail or be better for each.

I don't care why you cannot understand that was the reason for not including it.

So XPS says this the number one problem with their system. I'm not saying what is #1 or not only that it would show up in Spektrum first so if voltage is your concern you should chose a better powersupply system or a different 2.4

I already said I would take the voltage part and adjust it to include voltage cutoff amounts as a con for all the systems.


I think the issue you are having is XPS told you your crash was voltage related and you don't agree with them. If I am correct, that has nothing to do with what I'm trying to accomplish. So drop it. If not I apologize ahead of time.
__________________
___SPONSORS____________________My Home Field_____


___________
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 08:43 PM   #260 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
jonkoppisch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mobile Alabama
Posts: 572
jonkoppisch is offline
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Quote: Originally Posted by sweetpea
View Post
...

Spektrum has the worst cutoff voltage...period. That was the point of including it in spektrums problems and not the others. I was trying to make the point if you put the systems in the same plane with same gear.....what would fail or be better for each....
So it is a competition.. Whether I like them or not was not why I said that! It's a reported problem with spektrum & XPS so it should be listed as such...

Your lack of wanting to list xps with a low voltage problem indicates a bias toward them as well... If not, then I apologize in advance

I was told voltage, I was told servos, I was told battery short, I was told failsafe.... Everything but what it appears to be... Lack of freq hopping when an outside source interfered...
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 08:48 PM   #261 (permalink)
Thanks for the Support!
 
SleepyC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Age: 37
Posts: 13,488
SleepyC is offline
Awards Showcase
FlyingGiants Good Dude Award: For stepping up to the plate, being a part of a fundraising effort for a good cause. Thank you. - Issue reason: Thank you very much for helping with the recent donation drive.  Brass Balls Award: For having sack.. - Issue reason: For having the SACK to photochop two of the most respected names in the hobby into precarious photographs. See http://www.flyinggiants.com/forums/showthread.php?p=90555  Platinum Diamond Studed Steaming Fabergé Turd: The SleepyC award. Enough said. - Issue reason: Because you, Sleepy, are a triple Platinum Daimond Studed Steaming Faberge Turd! In a good way of course! LOL! 300+ post thread, and took it like a man! 
Total Awards: 3
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Attached Images
File Type: jpg untitled.jpg (28.3 KB, 12 views)
__________________
BUILDING SEASON IS HERE!!
Break out the glue sand paper and covering iron!! whoO hoo!
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 08:52 PM   #262 (permalink)
Gettin' Lower!
 
Leseirf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bloomington, Indiana
Age: 42
Posts: 69
Leseirf is offline
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Man, you got that right!
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 09:04 PM   #263 (permalink)
Eccentricus Magnus
 
KrisW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Age: 50
Posts: 3,450
KrisW is offline
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

My 72 mhz works just fine. . let me know when you guys get this 2.4ghz stuff fixed. . . . . .
__________________
KrisW
"Mediocrity is doing it THEIR way"

It's 20% Plane, 5% Engine, and 75% Practice, practice, Practice . . .Excuse me, I'm off to the field.
http://www.modelaircraftengineering.com
BME Repair and Modifications Guru
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 09:05 PM   #264 (permalink)
I don't do "custom" user title
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 101
wrightme is offline
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Quote: Originally Posted by jonkoppisch
View Post
You need to put the battery issue on xps as well.... At least that's what they claim whenever there's any problem!!!!!

It is also what has been reported by the owners of crashed R/C airplanes and helis independently of what XPS suggests. One has only to view the forum over on RCG to see this. I would also go out on a limb and state that the MAJORITY of crash reports on the RCG XPS forum ended up being actual voltage delivery issues, independent of any RX faults. In other words, other than in your jet, when XPS suggested a possible voltage delivery problem, the owner DID forensically CONFIRM a voltage problem that was NOT an XPS failure.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Threaded Mode