Welcome to The FlyingGiants! - please login or click this bar to join our community...

NitroPlanes Giant Scale New Arrivals Sales Nitro Planes Gadgets
 

Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!!

Go Back   FlyingGiants Forums > General RC Product Discussions > 2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology


2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology Discuss Spektrum, Futaba FASST, and all of the exciting 2.4 transmitter/receiver technology here!

Support our Sponsors

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-08-2008, 06:00 PM   #529 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
JEFFRO503's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: St helens OR
Age: 41
Posts: 1,478
JEFFRO503 is offline
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Quote: Originally Posted by nakia
View Post
Not sure if im allowed to post this up but thought it may be appropriate to this thread..(sorry if it has already been posted)

http://www.vimeo.com/668834/

http://www.vimeo.com/668850/

I am so friggin glad i didn't buy this P.O.S. system! After watching those video's , looks as though XJET was right all along. As far as i'm concerned i think mister JD is a fraud , and a liar. The ONLY thing i can say is i feel bad for those guys who bought into his deception. What a joke. I can't wait to see the tests on the JR , Spektrum and fasst systems. I think these three will all perform well , just like they are supposed to. I think i may be getting the new futaba fast moduel for my 9Z , but i think i'd feel safe with JR or spektrum as well........they've proven themselves. Can't wait for the tests though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2008, 06:20 PM   #530 (permalink)
Eccentricus Magnus
 
KrisW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Age: 51
Posts: 3,568
KrisW is offline
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Quote: Originally Posted by JEFFRO503
View Post
I am so friggin glad i didn't buy this P.O.S. system! After watching those video's , looks as though XJET was right all along. As far as i'm concerned i think mister JD is a fraud , and a liar. The ONLY thing i can say is i feel bad for those guys who bought into his deception. What a joke. I can't wait to see the tests on the JR , Spektrum and fasst systems. I think these three will all perform well , just like they are supposed to. I think i may be getting the new futaba fast moduel for my 9Z , but i think i'd feel safe with JR or spektrum as well........they've proven themselves. Can't wait for the tests though.
Ya know, I understand everyone getting PO'd about JD and the XPS stuff not being what was claimed. But c'mon Jeffro. . the name calling, albeit probably accurate. . is it really necessary?

Okay. . Isn't JR just using the Spektrum firmware, software, and design pieces to put into their own systems. . or is the JR setup totally proprietary from the Spektrum stuff?

I thought they were basically the same, with differences only concerning the radios they must work in.
__________________
KrisW
"Mediocrity is doing it THEIR way"

It's 20% Plane, 5% Engine, and 75% Practice, practice, Practice . . .Excuse me, I'm off to the field.
http://www.modelaircraftengineering.com
BME Repair and Modifications Guru
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2008, 06:34 PM   #531 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
zoomer260's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Louisville,KY
Age: 50
Posts: 2,613
zoomer260 is offline
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Quote: Originally Posted by sweetpea
View Post
Well I for one was not a sucker.

I didn't buy into the hype and all. I went in expecting it might not work, like I do with every peice of electronic I put in my planes. Am I dissapointed that for now it appears that things were not as I percieved them to be? Yes. Am I sorry I spent my money and possibly lost a plane to it (since I cannot 100% determine that).....actually no, I'm not sorry I tried it. It does suck the time and money I was out but I never put anything in the air I cannot afford to lose.



But that is just me. Everyone will have their own thoughts.
In this hobby money spent has already been lost. Might not can replace what ya bought, but the money was already "afforded".
It's the windshield or the kids use of his left eye that has not been not been afforded.
These things are potentionally lethal from I'd say .25 cc all the way up and any safety measure taken with one should be taken with all.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2008, 07:29 PM   #532 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
JEFFRO503's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: St helens OR
Age: 41
Posts: 1,478
JEFFRO503 is offline
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Ok......maybe the name calling was a bit harsh , but honestly , the guy lied about what his system does , and doesn't do. There for taking the money of many people whom believed in him.....which , isn't that called being a fraud? I know it may seem a bit harsh , but those two words "liar" and "fraud" seem to be the only two words i could come up with that fit the profile. He sold a system ( probably thousands of them) , made his money , and now , i'll bet you money , he'll run and hide and won't make it right. I know from reading other threads about JD in other hobbies ( like paintball for instance) he did the same thing. Made some new "change the friggin' world" paint ball gun , and when it became obvious that it didn't work worth a crap , he bailed out on all those people as well. he also had something to do with something he created in the computer industry that didn't work out , and guess what....he bailed after he got all his money.

see a pattern here......??
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2008, 07:41 PM   #533 (permalink)
You want me to do what?!
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: WV
Posts: 1,435
buttface is offline
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

JD will be facing some law suits in the very near future.
Don't ask me how I know....
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2008, 09:31 PM   #534 (permalink)
Gettin' Lower!
 
bjon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Alberta Canada
Age: 49
Posts: 37
bjon is offline
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Well, it hurts have lost a nice new big plane, but I am so.... sooo glad I was alone and nobody got hurt. Man you guys when that plane when in at that speed, it was a scary ,scary thing to see. PLEASE tell others that are using XPS of the inherant dangers, you really could be saving someone from causing, huge damage,injury, or (God forbid) a death. I am out allot of money(plane,engine repairs +shipping from Canada and prop,spinner switches etc). At least nobody was hurt and no other property was involved. My XPS system is NOT FOR SALE and WILL NOT BE USED BY ME,unless there are safe and verified changes made to the system. Brad
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2008, 10:22 PM   #535 (permalink)
GRAVITY SUCKS
 
rede2fly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: florida
Posts: 2,824
rede2fly is offline
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Quote: Originally Posted by bjon
View Post
Well, it hurts have lost a nice new big plane, but I am so.... sooo glad I was alone and nobody got hurt. Man you guys when that plane when in at that speed, it was a scary ,scary thing to see. PLEASE tell others that are using XPS of the inherant dangers, you really could be saving someone from causing, huge damage,injury, or (God forbid) a death. I am out allot of money(plane,engine repairs +shipping from Canada and prop,spinner switches etc). At least nobody was hurt and no other property was involved. My XPS system is NOT FOR SALE and WILL NOT BE USED BY ME,unless there are safe and verified changes made to the system. Brad
i tryed to tell my flying bud to take a look at this thread which, by the way is or was using the xps on his 33% sd extra w/da85 it is now in the grave. most guys wont listen until it happens to them. he now has swore off gas planes and has gone back to the little stuff. which i guess is for the best. if you cant afford to loose it you cant afford to fly it. anyway iam glad i did not fall for it. i almost pulled the trigger on this system because of the price. shure glad i didnt. i wish the ama would make a call on the radio b/s and either say 2.4 or 72. one or the other and be done with it.
__________________
dont tell me how to do it....... show me how
Florida Freestyle Aerobatic Association
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2008, 01:16 AM   #536 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
bgold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,009
bgold is offline
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

This may be a stupid question but if a Fasst system and an XPS are flying at the same time does the XPS loose signal breifly when the Fasst cycles through the frequency the XPS is on and if 4 Fasst's were flying would the XPS be jammed and loose signal more frequently.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2008, 01:23 AM   #537 (permalink)
Pimpalicious
 
airborneSGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kville, NC
Age: 28
Posts: 1,929
airborneSGT is offline
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

So what does this mean with the XPS system? I have the directlink about 50% installed in my smaller plane but I havent flown it yet.
__________________
Performance Aircraft Unlimited


Getting R Done since 81!

  Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2008, 01:24 AM   #538 (permalink)
Pimpalicious
 
airborneSGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kville, NC
Age: 28
Posts: 1,929
airborneSGT is offline
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

XPS is that the same as Extremelink? Just want to make sure.
__________________
Performance Aircraft Unlimited


Getting R Done since 81!

  Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2008, 01:41 AM   #539 (permalink)
If you can't HUCK it BLING IT!
 
sweetpea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Whidbey Island, WA
Age: 34
Posts: 7,319
sweetpea is online now
Awards Showcase
Japaleno Bad Ass: This is to say thank you for donating  funds to help bring Wesse to the 09 Joe Nall! - Issue reason: Thank you so much! Official FG Bad Ass!: Hand selected award for being a BAD-ASS member, and an awesome dude in general. - Issue reason: For helping put on the 2007 FlyingGiants Las Vegas Huckfest, and being an essential friend of The Giants! 
Total Awards: 2
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Quote: Originally Posted by bgold
View Post
This may be a stupid question but if a Fasst system and an XPS are flying at the same time does the XPS loose signal breifly when the Fasst cycles through the frequency the XPS is on and if 4 Fasst's were flying would the XPS be jammed and loose signal more frequently.
That's an interesting question. even if it did, Fasst is only on the freq for a fraction of a second which isn't enough time to go into failsafe...it should cause XPS to retransmit a packet. I would think this would be similar to one fade like on Spektrum.

Doesn't XPS/FASST/Spektrum use a unique code so they don't interfere with one another? The real problem XPS has been encountering is higher powerlevels than R/C transmitters. When Kiwi is finally able to test we should see exactly what power level will negatively hurt XPS and the other systems.

Quote: Originally Posted by airborneSGT
View Post
XPS is that the same as Extremelink? Just want to make sure.
Yes they are one in the same. XPS stands for Xtremelink Power Systems
__________________
Offical Member of Team Caribou Lou
A 'Veteran' -- whether active duty, discharged,retired, or reserve --is someone who, at one point in his life, wrote a blank check made payable to 'The United States of America,' for an amount of 'up to, and including his life.' That is honor, and there are way too many people in this country today, who no longer understand that fact
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2008, 01:42 AM   #540 (permalink)
You want me to do what?!
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: WV
Posts: 1,435
buttface is offline
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Quote: Originally Posted by airborneSGT
View Post
So what does this mean with the XPS system? I have the directlink about 50% installed in my smaller plane but I havent flown it yet.
My GOD ! Please don't fly it until you swap out for another brand ,anything but XPS!!! If you want to keep your plane and avoid human bodily injury.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
xps


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Xtreme Link Experiences Fly3DWithStyle 2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology 1221 03-27-2009 12:37 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 PM.


  Sitemap :: Contact Us :: Community :: News :: Videos and Photos :: About Us
FlyingGiants, and The Leading Edge, are trademarks of RCGroups.com LLC. All content (c). All rights reserved.
Please view our disclaimer


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0