Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS - Page 58

Home

Forum Navigation

Forum Home

Post Hucker (realtime)

New Posts

Private Messages

Search FlyingGiants

Subscribed Threads

My FlyingGiants

Forum Policies

Memberlist

Blogs!

Bloggin! Home

Getting Started

New Entries

New Comments

SwapShop

Browse All Categories

Post An Ad!

Media Gallery

Photo Gallery ->>

Upload Media!

Video Gallery ->>

Upload Media!

Big Events Gallery ->>

Upload Media!

Killer Desktop Backgrounds

Best of The Giants!

Media By Member

Media Gallery Settings

Product Research

Product Perspectives

Hobby Products Database

Essentials

Event Calendar ->>

Add an Event!

Official Community Calendar

GroundSchool

Chat Room

Giant Jargon

Links & Friends

XML & RSS Feeds

FGTV Live! Viewing Room

Swag

News Archives

About

About FlyingGiants

Meet Our Staff

FlyingGiants Sponsors

Website Help and Support

Peanut Butter Jelly Time

Sign Up!

**madmax** · 02-23-2008, 05:50 PM

Spectralink 4.8.

ricoalonso · 02-23-2008, 06:14 PM

	Quote: Originally Posted by madmax
	Spectralink 4.8.

Oh don't tell me ... this early?

...

bosshoss · 02-23-2008, 08:00 PM

http://www.flyinggiants.com/forums/f...l-s-prank.html

LOL.

airborneSGT · 02-23-2008, 08:31 PM

I am just recalling my days as an RTO. We used FH in our ASIP radios. Program comsec in the radios you want to talk to and nothing will interfere. Radios not on comsec even on FH cant even talk. Probably not allowed to talk about all that but it worked well on those FM radios.

Just thinking about it I wonder why there has been nothing similar for RC? Heck with your own unique ID on a frequency hopping scheme I doubt you would EVER be shot down.

MalaysianFlyer · 02-23-2008, 09:16 PM

Well the other option is to use a dual link, one link on 2.4 and one link on FM. Sounds impossible??? Its already on the market

http://www.acteurope.de/html/s3d-maxx.html

The benefit would be that you can now go to the field and have double the amount of comments about why your link will fail !!!!!! LOL

Seriously though, this does look interesting, am consideirng it for my setup. These guys also had a dual band transmitter module, that would allow you to transmit on 72 and 50 (for example) at the same time.

MalaysianFlyer · 02-23-2008, 09:26 PM

	Quote: Originally Posted by madmax
	Spectralink 4.8.

Wasn't that upgraded to hoplesslink 5.2 ???

airborneSGT · 02-23-2008, 11:05 PM

Forget all those fancy 2.4ghz or FM systems. I will just use a really long wire. A control line 40%

**Kiwi** · 02-24-2008, 09:00 AM

Guys,

To keep you all in the loop.

I was working yesterday on the new XPS tests and my Scanner receiver took a serious dump. I think its smoked and will have a new one on the way Monday. Looks like I fried it when I unplugged the external power supply to my laptop. No idea why thats irrelevant.

Sorry for the delay guys, I was set to sew this up this weekend but Murphy came visiting by the looks of it.

Here's a shot of the systems I have available now and the Spektrum DX7 is due Tuesday.

KrisW · 02-24-2008, 06:29 PM

	Quote: Originally Posted by Kiwi
	Guys, To keep you all in the loop. I was working yesterday on the new XPS tests and my Scanner receiver took a serious dump. I think its smoked and will have a new one on the way Monday. Looks like I fried it when I unplugged the external power supply to my laptop. No idea why thats irrelevant. Sorry for the delay guys, I was set to sew this up this weekend but Murphy came visiting by the looks of it. Here's a shot of the systems I have available now and the Spektrum DX7 is due Tuesday.

When you are finished with the systems, how bout sending them to me so I can try some "field testing" with them for a few months or so??

ChrisHays · 02-24-2008, 06:49 PM

thanks for all your hard work kiwi.. on the other hand....

66 days xjet... and still no data from you my friend

XJet · 02-24-2008, 07:32 PM

	Quote: Originally Posted by ChrisHays
	thanks for all your hard work kiwi.. on the other hand.... 66 days xjet... and still no data from you my friend

Yeah but I've got a snot-load of other work done around here -- and that's what pays the bills!

Stay tuned -- don't change frequencies :-)

ChrisHays · 02-24-2008, 07:47 PM

	Quote: Originally Posted by XJet
	Yeah but I've got a snot-load of other work done around here -- and that's what pays the bills! Stay tuned -- don't change frequencies :-)

im toooo poor to change frequencies.. unless you want to do some more work and loan me a 2.4ghz system

02-23-2008, 05:50 PM	#685 (permalink)
madmax Pre-SleepyC Tuna Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Mexifornia Age: 37 Posts: 9,825 Blog Entries: 8 Awards Showcase Total Awards: 3	Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS Spectralink 4.8. __________________ Sponsored by Visa, American Express, and The Discover Corporation.

02-23-2008, 08:00 PM	#687 (permalink)
bosshoss Bad-ass Super Contributer! Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Schiller Park ,IL Posts: 692 Awards Showcase Total Awards: 1	Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS http://www.flyinggiants.com/forums/f...l-s-prank.html LOL.

02-23-2008, 08:31 PM	#688 (permalink)
airborneSGT Pimpalicious Join Date: May 2006 Location: Kville, NC Age: 28 Posts: 1,929	Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS I am just recalling my days as an RTO. We used FH in our ASIP radios. Program comsec in the radios you want to talk to and nothing will interfere. Radios not on comsec even on FH cant even talk. Probably not allowed to talk about all that but it worked well on those FM radios. Just thinking about it I wonder why there has been nothing similar for RC? Heck with your own unique ID on a frequency hopping scheme I doubt you would EVER be shot down. __________________ *Performance Aircraft Unlimited* Getting R Done since 81!

02-23-2008, 09:16 PM	#689 (permalink)
MalaysianFlyer Bad-ass Super Contributer! Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Malaysia Age: 37 Posts: 266	Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS Well the other option is to use a dual link, one link on 2.4 and one link on FM. Sounds impossible??? Its already on the market http://www.acteurope.de/html/s3d-maxx.html The benefit would be that you can now go to the field and have double the amount of comments about why your link will fail !!!!!! LOL Seriously though, this does look interesting, am consideirng it for my setup. These guys also had a dual band transmitter module, that would allow you to transmit on 72 and 50 (for example) at the same time.

02-23-2008, 11:05 PM	#691 (permalink)
airborneSGT Pimpalicious Join Date: May 2006 Location: Kville, NC Age: 28 Posts: 1,929	Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS Forget all those fancy 2.4ghz or FM systems. I will just use a really long wire. A control line 40% __________________ *Performance Aircraft Unlimited* Getting R Done since 81!

02-24-2008, 06:49 PM	#694 (permalink)
ChrisHays Bad-ass Super Contributer! Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Memphis Tn Age: 26 Posts: 346 Blog Entries: 3	Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS thanks for all your hard work kiwi.. on the other hand.... 66 days xjet... and still no data from you my friend __________________

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Xtreme Link Experiences	Fly3DWithStyle	2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology	1221	03-27-2009 12:37 PM