| | ||||||
| | ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
| |||||||
| 2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology Discuss Spektrum, Futaba FASST, and all of the exciting 2.4 transmitter/receiver technology here! |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1117 (permalink) |
| Flyin' Around ![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 14
|
Thanks Kiwi, I am currently using ASSAN in a pretty benign 2.4 environment with mostly EP foamies. I am also using a X8R7L with the long antenna on a 0.25ci slimer. So far, no issues that can be directly attributed to the radio. It's good to know what I am getting into anyway, but since ASSAN did not not make any wild claims, I cannot fault them for anything. chewy |
|
| | #1118 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 312
|
Exactly, Assan neither claimed to have invented some kind of super-monopole-antenna, nor did they claim to hop when they don't. The problem is that if you don't hop, it's worse flying 2.4GHz than 35 MHz (I'm in europe) because that frequency is reserved for RC - 2.4GHz isn't. |
|
| | #1119 (permalink) |
| Super Contributer ![]() Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Germany
Posts: 131
|
Thank you Kiwi for all the time and effort! People like you make theis hobby wonderful! Should you once consider doing tests on Fasst and Spektrum swamping large sections of the band, you could put Fasst in "France mode". This way, it will use less channels, and make it easier to swamp the part of the band it uses. Cheers, Julian |
|
| | #1120 (permalink) |
| Flyin' Around ![]() Join Date: May 2007 Location: PORIRUA
Posts: 2
|
Thanks very much, Kiwi. That's all I need to know. Pretty easy to judge systems now with this excellent info. Anyone who has an expensive plane bite the dust because they chose to ignore this evidence deserves all they get. A kiwi in NZ. |
|
| | #1121 (permalink) |
| Uber Contributer ![]() Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: UK
Posts: 155
|
Thanks Kiwi, that is just what we all suspected to be the results I think, did you by chance put the Spektrum flight logger on the Rx after the test? it would be interesting to see the frame drop outs on each aerial, just a thought. Mike |
|
| | #1122 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: murray utah
Posts: 1,906
|
I flew a heli on an infra red guidance system and there was no interference- but the tv changed channels what is rong? |
|
| | #1123 (permalink) |
| KIGECA ![]() Join Date: May 2008 Location: Abington, Pa Age: 56
Posts: 67
|
Kiwi you've done great work. Thank you. I figured there was something screwy with XPS from the day I got it. I was one of the first people to buy it. I hooked it up on my kitchen counter with one servo and a freshly charged pack and it started pulsing the servo. I put it in my 33% H9 Cap and things got weirder, like pulsing rudder, uncommanded control inputs and no response at all even with green lights on transmitter module and receiver. Jim Drew and the other XPS forum people told me my 9Z was the problem. I figured that was nonsense which proved to be true. I put a Spektrum module in my 9Z and it has worked perfectly with Spektrum ever since. Here are some short, entertaining videos of that bizarre XPS behavior: |
|
| | #1124 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Eccentricus Magnus ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Charlotte, North Carolina Age: 51
Posts: 3,568
|
__________________ KrisW "Mediocrity is doing it THEIR way" It's 20% Plane, 5% Engine, and 75% Practice, practice, Practice . . .Excuse me, I'm off to the field. http://www.modelaircraftengineering.com BME Repair and Modifications Guru | ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
| | #1126 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() ![]() |
Haaaaaa Dustflyer, To quote JD those are not real world tests mate. No one flies in a simulated environment. Bench testing has nothing on doing it down at the club mate. Seriously your lucky and or scrupulous in your setup to find that as a lot of people really only wave the sticks around to make sure things move but they dont always hold them away from the servo center point for any length of time. How often have you seen some one take off with a new plane and have the flying surfaces reversed. Its because they only waggle them, they do not make a positive ID of how far, how fast etc. There's no doubt that XPS is a second tier system and not for every application. In fact if it functions like that I dont know what application it would fit. | ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
| | #1128 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Mobile Alabama
Posts: 600
|
Shame on you Dusty! You couldn't get it to work on the bench so you didn't just go ahead and fly it!!!! Especially since those tests don't count ![]() I sure wish that it would have done that for me! |
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| xps |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Xtreme Link Experiences | Fly3DWithStyle | 2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology | 1221 | 03-27-2009 12:37 PM |