![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| | ||||||
| | ||||||
Please support our sponsors | ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
| |||||||
| Gas Engines and Power Discuss all aspects of giant scale power systems |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: No Matter
Posts: 398
|
OK.... so I just got a new prop for my DA-100 and I'm wondering if my observations are normal. I was running a Menz 27x10 and I got a Mej 28x10... I was told thay are about the same load as a Menz 27x10. The Menz seemed to get much more RPM in the lower part of the throttle travel and the last 1/4 stick had almost no power change. Tuning was difficult... I never really saw much change in peak RPM with needle adjustments. The Mej seems to require more throttle in the lower power range to do the same thing as the Menz... it seems to take a bit more from engine to turn the prop at the lower RPMs. Result is that the throttle feels more linear... there are definite and almost equal RPM changes all the way up to full throttle. The peak RPMs are down a bit (about 6,300 right after landing from a hard flight... almost 90 degrees and VERY humid... I would expect about 6,500 cold). I see a definite change in RPM with every small tweak on the high needle. I leaned it to about 6,300 (hot engine) and can probably go in more... my needle was a little more that 1.5 turns out to start with, now I'm back in to 1.5 turns and RPM was still increasing when I stopped turning it in. The low needle seems like it needs to be much leaner than it did with the Menz prop. Overall, uplines seem stronger and braking is better. The plane slows down for landing much easier... I could salvage landings that would have been a go-around with the other prop. Let me know what you've experienced!
__________________ Sicko |
|
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: La Jolla, CA USA
Posts: 1,431
|
I switched from a 27 X 10 wooden prop to the Menjslik 28 X 10 on my 100cc YAK and it made an incredible difference. My observations are the same as yours. The 28 X 10 is the way to go, at least for IMAC.
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BME 115 Tuning Help | GSM026 | Gas Engines and Power | 375 | 11-20-2008 06:47 AM |
| Gas engine tuning for newbies.... | Pro1Foam | Gas Engines and Power | 245 | 11-10-2008 01:20 PM |
| 3W-212B4 Tuning and best prop | ultimate65 | Gas Engines and Power | 2 | 01-25-2008 06:37 PM |
| Tuning a Brison 3.2 | airriley | Gas Engines and Power | 4 | 12-15-2006 11:50 AM |
| ZDZ 80 Tuning | moose | Gas Engines and Power | 18 | 07-24-2006 03:33 PM |