| | ||||||
| | ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
| |||||||
| View Poll Results: Which Extra 260? | |||
| Aeroworks Extra 260 QB | | 25 | 62.50% |
| Hangar 9 Extra 260 | | 15 | 37.50% |
| Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Life Begins at 200 mph! ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Mount Holly, NC Age: 54
Posts: 993
|
Which of the two Extra 260's would you buy if you had a choice? I'm looking at the Aeroworks Extra 260 QB (100cc) or the Hangar 9 Extra 260 engine choice would be the new revised DA-100. I'm not starting a brand war here either guys, just want some advice and why. Both planes are about the same price.
|
|
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: La Jolla, CA USA
Posts: 1,783
|
This is a tough one, because booth planes are very nice. I own an AW 100cc 260 and really enjoy flying it. It is a great all around plane. I have flown the H9 260 and it is also a great flying model. If your primary orientation is IMAC with some light 3-D then I would give the nod to the H9. It is stretched a little more than the AW, and I have found that it tracks, and generally does precision a little better. However, my experience is that the AW is a better built model, and seems to hold up better. I have seen a number of the H9 fail while flying, another one this last weekend. Especially if your primary focus is freestyle, or equally mixed between 3D and precision I would go with the Aeroworks. Hope you find this useful. |
|
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Life Begins at 200 mph! ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Mount Holly, NC Age: 54
Posts: 993
|
I will not be using the plane for 3D, I'm just a typical Saturday flyer, nothing fancy not yet anyway. I own two Aeroworks QB planes now, a 50cc and a 75cc Yak. The quality is second to none and they fly nice also.
|
|
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Mother Huckin' ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Caguas, Puerto Rico Age: 23
Posts: 3,569
|
They both fly great. I would go with the Aeroworks because of the quality and finishing of the airplane. The plane's literally done out of the box except the rudder. I think you have to glue the canopy on the H9. The CD manual on the Aeroworks is as good a manual as you'll ever going to find (even though most of us don't use the manuals on these planes) My vote is Aeroworks. I had the 35% 260 and it's an awesome performer.
__________________ Proudly Sponsored by: Aircraft International Aerohobbies B&E Graphics Jersey Modeler |
|
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Washington Age: 38
Posts: 422
|
Aeroworks, in agreement with Vic - goes together quicker and better overall construction and finish...
__________________ ____________________________________________ WWW.FLYRCEXTREME.COM "We are the Extreme in R/C" What am I flying Now ?: Quique Aircraft Company - Python and Yak on Hacker A100 Converting all my Giants to Electric in 2008!!!! |
|
| | #9 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Tucson Age: 34
Posts: 4,846
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Texas
Posts: 1,291
|
Did you know that the Extra 260 and the EXtra 300 are basically the same plane? The primary difference is the 300 has a longer canopy, that's about it. The 300L and 300S are different, they are low wing planes, but the 300 is a mid wing just like a 260. Maybe tis will open up your view a little. TF |
|
| | #12 (permalink) |
| 3D Aerobatics ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Caguas, Puerto Rico, USA Age: 33
Posts: 281
|
Hey what the hell, go buy a Yak!!! Couldn't help my self. I guess they'll fly as good as you trim them, for me this is the key. I have seen the AW and it is a good performer. What I have read here about the H9 260 it that it also a good performer but have some bugs (construction, problems with crak cowlings, phenolics being to tight) that they have to work out. So why dont you buy the one that is more atractive to you, and then spend time triming the airplane right for your type of flying. Regards
__________________ Sponsor by my Wallet. Criticized by My Wife!! |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Spektrum lost connection with my H9 Extra 260 | redbarret1 | 2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology | 49 | 12-04-2008 09:57 AM |
| AirfoilZ 40" Extra 260 | king160woody | Airframes and Kits | 13 | 09-03-2008 10:08 PM |
| Aeroworks 75cc Extra 260 Questions/Availability... Anyone users here? | Paul Cataldo | Giant Scale Airframes and Kits | 1 | 02-02-2008 10:07 PM |
| Hangar 9 35% Extra 260 Wing Reinforcement Notice 01.15.08 | wizard | Giant Scale Airframes and Kits | 12 | 01-29-2008 01:32 PM |
| Sd 260 or airwild 260 +$$ | Show871 | Giant Scale Airframes and Kits | 4 | 12-27-2007 08:13 PM |