Welcome to The FlyingGiants! - please login or click this bar to join our community...

NitroPlanes Giant Scale New Arrivals Sales Nitro Planes Gadgets
 

Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!!

Go Back   FlyingGiants Forums > Giant Scale Discussions > Giant Scale Airframes and Kits


Support our Sponsors

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-14-2008, 06:14 PM   #1 (permalink)
Life Begins at 200 mph!
 
luv2flyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Age: 54
Posts: 993
luv2flyguy is offline
Default Would I be disappointed in a QQ Yak

Hey guys- I have been flying Aeroworks planes here for a while, I am looking at buying another but for some reason I have been thinking about the 102" QQ Yak, is this plane as good as it's advertised or would I be disappointed? My AW is a great plane and flies like I want it to, I'm moving up to the 100cc class I thought I might want to try something different, no one close to me has one of these planes or I would go and look at it, one concern, is the quality as good as the AW, I'm use to the
qb series and I know it will take longer to get it together than the QB series but will it last a good while of just basic flying, I'm not a 3Der not yet anyway. Thanks for all the help here on FG, this is a great family to be hooked up with.

Last edited by luv2flyguy; 08-28-2008 at 06:45 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 06:21 PM   #2 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Show871's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 599
Show871 is online now
Default Re: Disappointed, QQ 102" Yak?

I am in your boat and actually just ordered the 100cc aeroworks because I like how solid and overbuilt it is, and all of the attention to details. My friend has a QQ and the build quility is not at the same level IMO. The AW is heavier, and its a fact the QQ is better for 3d, but I would rather have better crafted plane that will last......871
__________________
Support My MX Racing Sponsors......Renthal Sprockets, SPY Optic, Dunlop Tires, Factory Connection Suspension, Monster Energy Drinks, Gaerne Boots, 661, Factory backing, Motoadventure Kawasaki ........http://sponsorhouse.loopd.com/Members/Show871/Home.aspx
http://tourplaygolf.com/home.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 06:27 PM   #3 (permalink)
Life Begins at 200 mph!
 
luv2flyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Age: 54
Posts: 993
luv2flyguy is offline
Default Re: Disappointed, QQ 102" Yak?

Which AW did you order? I feel the same about the build quality and I know that the AW will weigh a little more, but I can get the CF accessories and loose a lot of that and I would rather have a better built airframe, it will last a lot longer IMO. Both of my AW planes are two years old and they still look new.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 06:54 PM   #4 (permalink)
The good, the bad and the IMAC
 
lazyboyflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Wildomar,Ca. USA
Posts: 464
lazyboyflyer is online now
Default Re: Disappointed, QQ 102" Yak?

Get the Aeroworks, your already happy with the quality and quick build. Get the Yak!
__________________
Comp-Arf 3m Extra 260
3DHS 89" AJ Slick
PAU 87" Yak 54


My flying buddy, Rusty
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 07:04 PM   #5 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
ddlstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Broken Arrow Ok
Age: 39
Posts: 485
ddlstang is online now
Default Re: Disappointed, QQ 102" Yak?

If your flying IMAC get the QQ - it tracks just awsome - it flies pattern better that it 3d's. look at the new 101" plane.
__________________
Dale Lathem
www.LA-Hobbies.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 07:09 PM   #6 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Aliso Viejo, CA
Posts: 1,863
Reza is offline
Default Re: Disappointed, QQ 102" Yak?

luv2fly,

You are more than welcome to buy any airplanes that you would like. What amazes me is opening number of threads on RCU and here, expressing your disappointment in something you've never owned before! I guess I spent enough time answering your PM.

The 102" QQ-Yak is a proven airplane and most likely the most sold 100cc plane in the market but again that doesn't mean other airplanes are junk! Buy whatever you like but don't make a disappointment out of something you've never owned!

If you are happy with what you have, I just can't find any reason for you to look for something else! I didn't answer your last PM because still I am not sure what your intentions are by certain things that you bring up and ask!

If it aint broke, don't fix it. Buy what you have your faith in. I assure you we won't go broke
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 07:31 PM   #7 (permalink)
Mid Florida RC
 
lastresort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Headed to the field.
Posts: 559
lastresort is offline
Default Re: Disappointed, QQ 102" Yak?

I don't understand are you dissapointed or just trying to figure out what you want to buy. The qq 101" is at the top of my list so if you've found something wrong. I'd be intrested.
__________________
Mid Florida Radio Control Club
Mike McCarson
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 07:32 PM   #8 (permalink)
Team Aerotech R/C Models
 
smokin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: clinton, ia. usa
Age: 34
Posts: 4,235
smokin is offline
Default Re: Disappointed, QQ 102" Yak?

never in a million years would i thought i would've seen a thread that put the AW yak over the QQ in quality! hey, to each his own but i am certain that there is less mixing and coupling issues with the QQ. both will be great but wow, i thought the QQ would win this debate hands down.

just my $.02
__________________
www.Aerotechrcmodels.com

Florida Freestyle Aerobatics Association
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 07:33 PM   #9 (permalink)
I Fly, therefore I Am!
 
The Flyin Hawaiian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 3D Party in Daytona!!!
Posts: 977
The Flyin Hawaiian is offline
Default Re: Disappointed, QQ 102" Yak?

Quote: Originally Posted by Reza
View Post
luv2fly,

You are more than welcome to buy any airplanes that you would like. What amazes me is opening number of threads on RCU and here, expressing your disappointment in something you've never owned before! I guess I spent enough time answering your PM.

The 102" QQ-Yak is a proven airplane and most likely the most sold 100cc plane in the market but again that doesn't mean other airplanes are junk! Buy whatever you like but don't make a disappointment out of something you've never owned!

If you are happy with what you have, I just can't find any reason for you to look for something else! I didn't answer your last PM because still I am not sure what your intentions are by certain things that you bring up and ask!

If it aint broke, don't fix it. Buy what you have your faith in. I assure you we won't go broke

Nicely said Reza, I have a QQ 102" Yak in my fleet for two years now, and it still gets flown regularly. It is truly a "Do It All Very Well" Airplane. QQ planes fly very well. Aeroworks is a very good airplane as well. Like you said, it does weigh a little more, and it flies great too. (I had a AW 100cc Extra 260) IMHO the QQ edges out the AW.
__________________
Rennie ...."Fly Low & Slow & In Control"
TEAM EXTREME of EXTREME FLIGHT R/C.com
Florida Freestyle Aerobatics Association
B & E Graphix www.bandegraphix.com
www.vessaero.com, Smart-Fly.com
Fantasy of Flight: Dec 6-7 "Xtreme Aerobtics Festival"
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 07:36 PM   #10 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
BOSSIER_ROB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Age: 34
Posts: 1,521
BOSSIER_ROB is offline
Default Re: Disappointed, QQ 102" Yak?

I would say if I were to choose between an aeroworks yak and a QQ yak, I would get the QQ without ever have flown one. I had the aeroworks and IMO, it flew like a hunk of crap with wings. I worked on that thing for a solid year to get it to fly right, gave up, and sold it. I have flown a couple aeroworks 260s and they were night and day from the yak. The extra flies amazingly well, but the yak ruined me. I have only heard that the QQ yak flies great, and only have seen one fly, but it flew great. I hate to be "that guy" that says don't buy this or don't buy that, so I won't do it. I'm just saying my experience with the aeroworks yak was not pleasant at all. I'm much happier with my 260 now.
__________________
Rob Maxwell

Last edited by BOSSIER_ROB; 08-14-2008 at 10:06 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 07:39 PM   #11 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Aliso Viejo, CA
Posts: 1,863
Reza is offline
Default Re: Disappointed, QQ 102" Yak?

This is where I have problem with the title of the thread and the way he brings up this matter! luv2fly has never owned an aircraft from QQAC. He's trying to find out if he should be concerned about the airplane longevity! Which is a valid question but I have seen his threads expressing disappointments and such with a conclusion of him buying AW! Just doesn't sound right!

I have never abused any other airframe I have had more than my 102" G2 and it's still in great shape after almost 2 years but then again I don't like to express my personal experience because it is seen biased! Not every airframe is perfect! There can be flaws here and there that you will find with any airplane company in the market!
Quote: Originally Posted by lastresort
View Post
I don't understand are you dissapointed or just trying to figure out what you want to buy. The qq 101" is at the top of my list so if you've found something wrong. I'd be intrested.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 07:42 PM   #12 (permalink)
Flyin' Around
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: nebraska city, nebraska
Posts: 4
jimmy the eagle is offline
Default Re: Disappointed, QQ 102" Yak?

I have a first generation QQ yak 102 with over 700 flights(4 years old). I've recovered it now twice. I've had two deadsticks into the bean fields, knocked an elevator off and the gear off twice. It still flies light and tracks great. It's my favorite plane to practice 3D and IMAC with both. I have no experience with the Aeroworks yak. Jim
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
QQ 102" Yak Gen I build and recover jbdesigns Git 'R Dun - Giant Scale! 59 12-02-2008 08:17 PM
Main Gear for 69"&49" QQ Yak. leelee General Discussions - Giant Scale 6 07-03-2008 09:12 PM
Landing Gear 49" QQ Yak leelee General Discussions - Giant Scale 0 06-22-2008 10:06 PM
QQ YAK KNIFE EDGE SPIN emessys General Discussions - Giant Scale 3 06-07-2008 08:19 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 AM.


  Sitemap :: Contact Us :: Community :: News :: Videos and Photos :: About Us
FlyingGiants, and The Leading Edge, are trademarks of RCGroups.com LLC. All content (c). All rights reserved.
Please view our disclaimer


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0