| | ||||||
| | ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Fly Hard, Crash Hard ![]() Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 66
|
Hey there, new to the this forum and seems to have a lot of knowledge . I have been set on two Giants, one being the Yak 54 from Aeroworks QB and the other the new Hanger 9 Yak 27%. I've been been fling RC plans and helis for a number of years; however this will be my first Big Scale.. so I am really excited to get into the big scales. What are your thoughts on both of these kits? What kits are better built for performance and quality? I really like what the Aeroworks kits which come with a great hardware and material package and didn't seem to much on the Hanger 9. Seems like the Hanger 9 are a bit more on the HIGH production side However the Carden designs I've been a fan of from reading post and feedback.I will be using a DA 50cc with the the kit since the weight is a bit lower then the 3W engines. Thanks for advise in advance.. |
|
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Need...more...POWER!!! ![]() Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Medina OH Age: 41
Posts: 1,106
|
Look at this one too. http://www.qqaircraft.com/planes.asp...&s_PLANE_CAT=d The H9 is heavy, and although I've only seen one, it was a letdown as far as H9 goes. Loose covering, bracing that was broken, poor gluing. For the money it was a disappointment, just in all the extra work required to make it solid. It still flies exceptionally well with a DA on it, but the extra couple of days worth of work to get it flying really took it down a notch. The guy who owns it thinks it was just poor QC at the factory. |
|
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Gettin' Lower! ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: HARWINTON CT
Posts: 44
|
LOOK AT THE SD THUNDER TIGER TOC MOBEL YAK 30% 33% .BY FAR THE BEST ARF FOR THE MONEY HANDS DOWN! FLIES THE BEST TO. YOU CAN GET THEM AT CHIEF AIRCRAFT OR VALLY VIEW RC
|
|
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Look at this stupid thing ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Smyrna,De Age: 34
Posts: 996
|
The H9 is very light and will fly circles around and aeroworks.
__________________ I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I said. |
|
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Look at this stupid thing ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Smyrna,De Age: 34
Posts: 996
|
I want the 110 Extreme Flight.
__________________ I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I said. |
|
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Fly Hard, Crash Hard ![]() Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 66
|
Thanks for some of the input; anyone else have any thoughts? In addition I want to stay under the $1400 price range for the kit and plane. Will this narrow my results a bit?Thanks guys 3DHeatsheildI haven't seen these before, thoughts on the link you sent?http://www.qqaircraft.com/planes.asp..._PLANE_CAT=dIs the hardware kit a good package and weight of the aircraft, what about comparison to the Aeroworks? Last edited by PilotCK; 09-28-2008 at 11:16 AM. |
|
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Portland Oregon Age: 49
Posts: 1,087
|
Pilotck, By far hands down go with the Extreme Flight Yak. I have personally seen all of the Yaks you mentioned. The Extreme Flight has the lightest wingloading in its class. It also has a glassed-in canopy. The workmanship is the best of all of them Chris Hinson has this one honed in. Do yourself a favor - in the 50CC class this the best Yak!!! I would not recommend the SD models Yak. Its OK but it comes out heavier and the workmanship is not up to par with the Extreme Flight not even close!!! The paint will fade on the SD and the canopy will give you a head ache..and the gear is soft and so on...These are not issues with the Extreme Flight... Oh FWIW - the canopy is completed on the EF Yak. The canopy on the SD you have to glue or screw it onto the canopy frame - its a pain..Did I mention that the EF Yak is the Bomb! Yes it is!!! EF Yak flys better and lets you progress faster because it does fly better!! It excells in 3D most of all!!! ![]() Ronster Last edited by rdgood; 09-28-2008 at 11:57 AM. |
|
| | #12 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Lakeland, Minnesota Age: 29
Posts: 814
|
You cant go wrong with any of the three you chose. The difference between the quality of the three? I believe that Quique builds his planes with more structure and a stronger design. The difference between the three will be as close as the next one produced by the same manufacturer.
__________________ This space for rent |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 3m CompArf YAK 55sp Build | wmat7039 | Git 'R Dun - Giant Scale! | 602 | 10-16-2009 04:05 PM |
| New!! 150cc Yak 54 QB | Mark Dennis | Giant Scale Airframes and Kits | 53 | 05-17-2008 01:55 AM |
| Anyone flying a ZDZ80/ Aeroworks 75cc Yak QB?????? | Paul Cataldo | Giant Scale Airframes and Kits | 10 | 04-30-2008 05:41 PM |
| YAK for Reflex ?? | FLYNYAK | Flight Simulators | 5 | 04-21-2008 02:23 AM |
| 3dHobbyShop Yak & Katana Vs Electric Flight Yak | Nebgonf | Airframes and Kits | 8 | 04-08-2007 11:34 AM |