| | ||||||
| | ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
| |||||||
| View Poll Results: Which one? | |||
| Hangar 9 35% 260 | | 7 | 53.85% |
| Thunder Tiger 40% 260 | | 6 | 46.15% |
| Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Illinois
Posts: 218
|
I need some help making up my mind here. I want to buy a new plane this winter. I've narrowed it down to two options. TTOC 40% 260 or a Hangar 9 35% 260. For either one I will have to buy an engine/prop/exaust, but i have all the servos to out fit the H9, and only a few short of the TOC. I've never owned a 40% but have flown a few i have felt the difference. However my 35% planes are nice to fly as well (and i hear great things on the H9). So the big question do you think it is worth it to spend the extra cash on the 40%? Why?
__________________ Common Sense RC Rep Hoffman Magnetics RC Paradise Deigo RC |
|
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Embry-Riddle R/C Flight Team ![]() |
Personally for IMAC I prefer a 40%. I use to prefer it for freestyle, but after flying a 32%er for free I am enjoying it more. You just got to remember the bigger they are the more there is to carry at the field. I wouldnt say the more that could go wrong, because you can set up a 40% with about the same set up as a 35%. If you have the money go 40%, but the cost difference is a lot! Good Luck!
__________________ Kevin Garland Team OMP/EG Aircraft- 100cc Yak 55 Smart-Fly- www.smart-fly.com Golden Eagle Aircraft Advanced 2010 SE Region- Next Event:? Florida Freestyle Aerobatic Association Team Florida |
|
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Walla Walla Wa
Posts: 418
|
The TTOC 240 is a nice flying plane,, I would buy the TT over the hangar 9 in either size as if you strip off the covering you will find the TT is a better built plane..
|
|
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Lexington Kentucky U.S.A.
Posts: 2,125
|
The H9 extra is an awesome plane but a 40%er is a 40%er...
__________________ Thanx to The Crew Mike B. Jim Z. Ed J. Jim S. www.jerseymodeler.com OMP Fusion; saito 125 rtf minus rx. feild box starter and 3 gallons of fuel - $650 located in Nashville http://www.rcuniverse.com/market/item.cfm?itemId=561284 |
|
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Lexington Kentucky U.S.A.
Posts: 2,125
|
Yep
__________________ Thanx to The Crew Mike B. Jim Z. Ed J. Jim S. www.jerseymodeler.com OMP Fusion; saito 125 rtf minus rx. feild box starter and 3 gallons of fuel - $650 located in Nashville http://www.rcuniverse.com/market/item.cfm?itemId=561284 |
|
| | #8 (permalink) |
| GRAVITY SUCKS ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: florida
Posts: 2,830
|
if it were me i would go with the hangar 9 you can get parts at a reasonable price. and you cant get that with ace tt... ask me how i know???
__________________ dont tell me how to do it....... show me how Florida Freestyle Aerobatic Association |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need a new 50cc Airframe.....Help Please | T-Time | Giant Scale Airframes and Kits | 30 | 06-02-2009 09:37 AM |
| Sub 16 pound IMAC capable 50cc Airframe | blackbeer | Giant Scale Airframes and Kits | 33 | 02-19-2009 05:16 PM |
| LOOKING FOR A 210 airframe | BillJ | General Discussions - Giant Scale | 12 | 10-14-2008 02:20 AM |
| new airframe | cbass | Glow Powered Airframes and Kits | 3 | 09-15-2008 02:24 AM |