Welcome to The FlyingGiants! - please login or click this bar to join our community...

Home About Us Newest Products Special Sales

Please support our sponsors
   

Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!!

Go Back   FlyingGiants Forums > Everything Else > General Manufacturer's Announcements


General Manufacturer's Announcements Announcements, or information related to your company's products. Post 'em here.

Support our Sponsors

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-10-2008, 08:56 PM   #229 (permalink)
Super Contributer
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 105
hughes500e is online now
Default Re: THE NEW MT 57CC ENGINE

Quote: Originally Posted by Al Lewis
View Post
From what little I've been able to read they are about the same so far. I still think the MT-57 would spin a bigger prop with a stiffer reed though. 24X10 or 26X8. That Xoar should give you good thrust. Don't you mean 23X8?? I use one on my smaller 43cc as Vess doesn't make a 20".
The XOAR dealer up here had no 23x8 props in stock so I'm checking out the 23A. Unless I read wrong with the stock exhaust I should be able to obtain 6800 to 7 RPM with good pull.

Here's a thought, with DL being new on the block perhaps they wanted the strongest running 50cc and marketed it as such. If we measure the actual displacement maybe...........
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2008, 09:32 PM   #230 (permalink)
Uber Contributer
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: stevens point wi
Posts: 186
jrjohn is offline
Default Re: THE NEW MT 57CC ENGINE

Quote: Originally Posted by sinergy
View Post
Al.. there have been no attacks on my part.. this moron just doesnt give up. I haven't even said one bad thing about the engine in the entire thread!

However John you can say what you like.. consider yourself ignored.. I refuse to response to your useless posts anymore. Your name calling amounts to the intelligence of a 5 year old
Chainsaw,I never wanted you to respond to me. How about you ingore everybody and just go away, thats all I really ask. And yes, your right, I don't give up, and I'm not paid for my opinion. No sales team for me.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2008, 10:59 PM   #231 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Al Lewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Age: 58
Posts: 2,768
Al Lewis is online now
Awards Showcase
Wesse's Haaard Man Award!: For showing our community the joy of eating jap-a-lin-os and being a haaaard man! Wesse Power! - Issue reason: You're a haaaaaaard man! 
Total Awards: 1
Default Re: THE NEW MT 57CC ENGINE

Quote: Originally Posted by hughes500e
View Post
The XOAR dealer up here had no 23x8 props in stock so I'm checking out the 23A. Unless I read wrong with the stock exhaust I should be able to obtain 6800 to 7 RPM with good pull.

Here's a thought, with DL being new on the block perhaps they wanted the strongest running 50cc and marketed it as such. If we measure the actual displacement maybe...........
I've checked the published bore and stroke and it's a 50. The key is in the ratio of bore to stroke. Just like the old 302 Chevy.
__________________
"Electric things run on smoke, Let the smoke out and they won't work"

Al Lewis
AMA #821623
IMAC #5457
http://www.geocities.com/lou_98366
One Nation, Under God!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2008, 11:19 PM   #232 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
robertp17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Middletown, Delaware
Age: 31
Posts: 652
robertp17 is offline
Default Re: THE NEW MT 57CC ENGINE

is it oversquare al? lots of engines have a bigger bore than stroke, just curious if the dl does.
__________________
"The harder you train the luckier you get" - unknown
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2008, 11:32 PM   #233 (permalink)
3D wantabe
 
soarrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Middletown, NJ o7748
Age: 59
Posts: 137
soarrich is offline
Thumbs up Re: THE NEW MT 57CC ENGINE

Quote: Originally Posted by hughes500e
View Post
The XOAR dealer up here had no 23x8 props in stock so I'm checking out the 23A. Unless I read wrong with the stock exhaust I should be able to obtain 6800 to 7 RPM with good pull.
If it's a Vess 23a my tach said 7400rpm and 33 pounds 8 ounces of thrust. I haven't calibated the scale but the tack is dead on 3600 with a light. Now I wish I didn't throw my bowling ball away, finally a use for a 16 pound ball. Anyone know of something common that is a specific weight near 25~30 pounds?

I flew a 23A Vess the engine liked it, I just got a Xoar 23A, but I've only flown that on my Brillelli 366GT it was a great combo, quiter that the Vess I think, flown two weeks apart though, so I'm not positive.

Al
I'm hoping you scale is reading light, because mine would have been at about 32~33 pounds. Who would think it would be so hard to find a fish scale that gave a honest reading?
__________________
Rich Border
AMA 77727
Those that beat there swords into plows farm for those that didn't.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 01:28 AM   #234 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
wildhare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 849
wildhare is online now
Default Re: THE NEW MT 57CC ENGINE

Quote: Originally Posted by soarrich
View Post
Anyone know of something common that is a specific weight near 25~30 pounds?
You could take it to the grocery store and weigh a frozen turkey or a big bottle of detergent or a bag of dog food or something. There are lots of heavy things in a grocery store and lots of scales around to weigh things to double check.

The weight of the turkey will be on the label, but I'd weigh it on a couple other scales and double check the reading.

TF
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 06:06 AM   #235 (permalink)
AJT
Doo It! Doo It!
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Kingston N.Y.
Posts: 75
AJT is online now
Default Re: THE NEW MT 57CC ENGINE

I always use a dumbell for a cail weight! seems to be a good standard. I'm sure there are pleanty of dumbells around for use (LOL).
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 08:33 AM   #236 (permalink)
3D wantabe
 
soarrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Middletown, NJ o7748
Age: 59
Posts: 137
soarrich is offline
Default Re: THE NEW MT 57CC ENGINE

Quote: Originally Posted by wildhare
View Post
The weight of the turkey will be on the label, TF
Cool idea, I'll offer to go shopping for the wife seeing it's Mother's day. Hey what a guy!
__________________
Rich Border
AMA 77727
Those that beat there swords into plows farm for those that didn't.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 10:42 AM   #237 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Al Lewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Age: 58
Posts: 2,768
Al Lewis is online now
Awards Showcase
Wesse's Haaard Man Award!: For showing our community the joy of eating jap-a-lin-os and being a haaaard man! Wesse Power! - Issue reason: You're a haaaaaaard man! 
Total Awards: 1
Default Re: THE NEW MT 57CC ENGINE

Quote: Originally Posted by robertp17
View Post
is it oversquare al? lots of engines have a bigger bore than stroke, just curious if the dl does.
DL Bore & Stroke is 43mm X 35mm
DA Bore & Stroke is 42.6mm X 35mm

Rich sounds like that fish scale was designed for bragging rights. I want to take that one salmon fishing with me!! LOL Like Tom says, you should be able to get something weighed at the local market close enough to check it. One other thought is, if you didn't turn it on until after the engine was running it would zero at about 2-3 pounds too high due to the pull from the idling engine. These scales zero when you turn them on regardless of what's on them.
__________________
"Electric things run on smoke, Let the smoke out and they won't work"

Al Lewis
AMA #821623
IMAC #5457
http://www.geocities.com/lou_98366
One Nation, Under God!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 07:34 PM   #238 (permalink)
3D wantabe
 
soarrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Middletown, NJ o7748
Age: 59
Posts: 137
soarrich is offline
Default Re: THE NEW MT 57CC ENGINE

Quote: Originally Posted by Al Lewis
View Post

Rich sounds like that fish scale was designed for bragging rights.
I checked it out, a 3.74 pound meat package weighed 3 pounds 12 ounces. A 36.4 pound battery weighed 36 pounds 7 ounces. That is less than .5% error, if there is any at all. I standby the numbers I posted 100%, they are accurate. The scale I have is a new Rapala 50 pound scale from BassPro on the web, it goes for about $30 to the door.

You want to take you DL's cowl off, hold your scale at crankshaft height, with 7400 rpm you'll get 30~31 pound thrust.

Tom needs a new scale. I'm sure if you hook a DA85 up to a Vess 23A spinning 7400 rpm without a cowl it'll make 33 pounds of thrust. I did all my test without a cowl like the picture showed.
__________________
Rich Border
AMA 77727
Those that beat there swords into plows farm for those that didn't.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 08:31 PM   #239 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Al Lewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Age: 58
Posts: 2,768
Al Lewis is online now
Awards Showcase
Wesse's Haaard Man Award!: For showing our community the joy of eating jap-a-lin-os and being a haaaard man! Wesse Power! - Issue reason: You're a haaaaaaard man! 
Total Awards: 1
Default Re: THE NEW MT 57CC ENGINE

That's it!!! Everybody's scale is bad but yours! LOL It may be your process Rich. There is a formula out there for calculating thrust. You should try and find it and see at what rpm a 22A (basically a 22 X 8) would need to be to put out 30 pounds of thrust. Better yet ask Robert Vess. He's on here all of the time and I'm sure would be happy to help out. I don't doubt your sincerity, just your methods.
__________________
"Electric things run on smoke, Let the smoke out and they won't work"

Al Lewis
AMA #821623
IMAC #5457
http://www.geocities.com/lou_98366
One Nation, Under God!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 08:53 PM   #240 (permalink)
3D wantabe
 
soarrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Middletown, NJ o7748
Age: 59
Posts: 137
soarrich is offline
Default Re: THE NEW MT 57CC ENGINE

Pe has a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, you can download it yourself from his website, it said 22x8 7530rpm + 33.07 pounds of thrust, run the spreadsheet yourself. BTW his program predicts NX 22x8 7172 rpm for 30 pound of thrust. No Vess prop constant in the spreadsheet.

Tom said his scale is crap, and you're measuring your engine with the cowl on, that will lower your thrust, try it.

Enough arguing, have a nice life.
__________________
Rich Border
AMA 77727
Those that beat there swords into plows farm for those that didn't.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (1 members and 1 guests)
Kenna
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gas engine tuning for newbies.... Pro1Foam Gas Engines and Power 260 12-03-2008 08:21 PM
Another Ozzie Extreme Composites 40% Extra 260 Build b0Bro's dad