Welcome to The FlyingGiants! - please login or click this bar to join our community...

Infinite Menus, Copyright 2006, OpenCube Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Please support our sponsors
   

Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!!

Go Back   FlyingGiants Forums > General RC Product Discussions > What's Hot!

What's Hot! New stuff to hit the market! Discuss it here!

Support our Sponsors

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-15-2008, 09:57 AM   #61 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Zeeb's Avatar
 
Zeeb's Stuff
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pleasant Grove, UT
Age: 57
Posts: 606
Zeeb is offline
View Photos and Videos
Default Re: New 2.4GHZ RECEIVER NO NEED FOR POWER BOXES

Pardon my ignorance if the answer is obvious; if you're running a power expander, why not just use an AR9000/R921 instead of the AR9100 power safe rx?
  <--Lame Post Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2008, 01:24 PM   #62 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
kevinc's Avatar
 
kevinc's Stuff
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Post Falls ID, usa
Age: 42
Posts: 251
kevinc is offline
View Photos and Videos
Default Re: New 2.4GHZ RECEIVER NO NEED FOR POWER BOXES

Im not using a power expander. Im using a turbo regulator.
  <--Lame Post Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2008, 01:42 PM   #63 (permalink)
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Zeeb's Avatar
 
Zeeb's Stuff
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pleasant Grove, UT
Age: 57
Posts: 606
Zeeb is offline
View Photos and Videos
Default Re: New 2.4GHZ RECEIVER NO NEED FOR POWER BOXES

Well I'm guessing the buss is common like it's predecessors and there's a guy over on RCU who's posting some results of tests he's run on the 9100. He said it runs just fine on one set of power inputs which would indicate that it is a common buss. I don't see why your idea wouldn't work.
  <--Lame Post Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2008, 06:03 PM   #64 (permalink)
Wantabe Hucker
 
2leftthumbs's Stuff
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 25
2leftthumbs is offline
View Photos and Videos
Default Re: New 2.4GHZ RECEIVER NO NEED FOR POWER BOXES

Do you need to run a regulator with the 9100? It list a range of 6-10v.
  <--Lame Post Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2008, 12:28 PM   #65 (permalink)
Hang'em Low
 
cjcyclesrc's Avatar
 
cjcyclesrc's Stuff
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 239
cjcyclesrc is offline
View Photos and Videos
Default Re: New 2.4GHZ RECEIVER NO NEED FOR POWER BOXES

Quote:
Do you need to run a regulator with the 9100? It list a range of 6-10v.
No. You don't need to run a regulator with the 9100.

The problem comes from your servos. The 9100 doesn't regulate power. If you have 7.4 volts going in your servos will get 7.4 volts.
__________________
Charles
  <--Lame Post Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2008, 02:09 AM   #66 (permalink)
Flyin' Around
 
TailTouch's Stuff
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 18
TailTouch is offline
View Photos and Videos
Default Re: New 2.4GHZ RECEIVER NO NEED FOR POWER BOXES

Hello experts.
I am moving from a 50cc gas plane to a 100cc mainly for IMAC (Basic). Since this will be my first 100cc, I want to keep things as simple as possible. My philosophy always has been "less the better".

As I understand, the need for powerboxes etc. arises because of the heavy amp draw of the newer super powerful servos like 8711 & 5955. The need for matchboxes is because you would need 2 servos for ailerons or rudder and if you are not an expert at mechanically aligning servos you have to use them (or a Hitec programmer) to prevent excessive current draw.

My question is that these new servos have more than enough torque to be used singly on a control surface for a 100cc plane. Is their any other reason besides torque (like control surface flex or flutter) why you would need more than 1 servo. Does a composite plane vs a wood plane make any difference.

If I want a really really simple setup, can I just have 5 8711's on all surfaces, 9100 Rx & 2 A123 batteries.

No matchbox, no extra switches, no regulators and no powerboxes.

I understand that everyone has their favorite setup and a lot of guys like a lot of gadgets in their planes but I am shooting (no pun intended) for a simple & inexpensive setup.

Thanks.
  <--Lame Post Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2008, 02:30 AM   #67 (permalink)
Turbine Hucker
 
dubd's Avatar
 
dubd's Stuff
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,016
dubd is offline
View Photos and Videos
Default Re: New 2.4GHZ RECEIVER NO NEED FOR POWER BOXES

Tailtouch, some guys recommend 2 servos per aileron so that the load can be spread across the entire surface. Some planes that require 2 aileron servos per wing have one aileron servo on both ends of the actual aileron. Using only one might pose a structural issue.
__________________
QuiQue Pitts Python | DA-100
Skymaster F-18F | Titan SE
Comp-ARF Flash | P-120 SE
JR 12X 2.4Ghz
  <--Lame Post Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS XJet 2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology 1477 08-20-2008 05:26 AM
JR-9303 2.4 Field Results 1bwana1 2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology 181 06-18-2008 04:32 PM
FG EXCLUSIVE: All New JR 12X & 9303 2.4GHZ! Cracky Leading Edge Homepage Article Discussions! 64 05-25-2008 08:07 PM
FlyingGiants Exclusive! Introducing The Futaba 12FG, Modules & More! madmax Leading Edge Homepage Article Discussions! 472 12-28-2007 10:25 AM
DX-7. This Changes Everything.. Again! LeadingEdge Leading Edge Homepage Article Discussions! 112 12-03-2006 03:58 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:44 AM.


  Sitemap :: Contact Us :: Community :: News :: Videos and Photos :: About Us
FlyingGiants, and The Leading Edge, are trademarks of RCGroups.com LLC. All content (c). All rights reserved.
Please view our disclaimer

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0