![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| | ||||||
| | ||||||
Please support our sponsors | ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
| |||||||
| What's Hot! New stuff to hit the market! Discuss it here! |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #37 (permalink) |
| Thanks for the Support! ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Cleveland, Ohio Age: 37
Posts: 13,491
|
Ok.. I was trying to make this all slick for MAX on the home page, but I can see there in no time. Heres the shots, I'm hoping KIWI will step in here and explain things.
__________________ BUILDING SEASON IS HERE!! Break out the glue sand paper and covering iron!! whoO hoo! |
|
| | #38 (permalink) |
| I knocked a horse out once. ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: South Carolina Age: 48
Posts: 3,163
|
I think the cat is out of the bag before it really should have been! The actuator assembly is really quite simple. Believe it or not the three blade system works a bunch better, One of the problems with VP is you have to use flat blades. Flat blades like flat wing are not very efficient. Obviously a wing on a plane would never see high sub-sonic speeds. A prop on the other hand does. The dynamic load of this spinning mass is trying to throw bades in the arc they are spinning. Thatis straight and level flight. Think of a simple 90 degree pull to vert. The load on the system HATES doing that. Much like spinning a bicycle hweel and trying to turn it. Most of that issue was solved with cromo-poly impregnated Titanium. So the P-factor and progressional loads are within limits. Now for the blade in-efficiency. Keeping a flat blade was almost a given. Enter Emo Krigel. Emo came up with the idea of using blades of a semi sym. construction. With this method,transferring flight loads in the forward flight realm is a far more efficient means. He concentrated on FORWARD flight because reverse is only used momentarily. Emo was the first guy to grasp the concept that reverse is only used for brief periods of the flight,so he needed to mostly concentrate on forward flight efficiency. As long as the system can handle the momentary shock of a down line stop and sustained invert hover it would work!!! BRAVO all who made this project a reality!! |
|
| | #39 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
| memberthe house of Lords Iwish ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Connecticut
Posts: 852
| Yeah right....You wished! No way.....I don't believe it! K L O W N
__________________ Klown during hobbytime,Asclépios at work! You may as well face it... Your addicted! www.wbrcflyingclub.org www.rcarmour.com RC Armour Wingbags | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| | #41 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() ![]() |
Guys, Second time around here on this one. I dont understand the problems with the video link, mine is working perfectly. Marcelo de Huevon has had only the last two weeks perfecting this setup. He told me in the vertical down line to hover the setup is still a little twitchy and takes some mixing because the torque reaction reverses when you go from + to - pitch. Biff is also very astute when he picked up the difficulty the boys had with the prop design. Sorry I cannot show you what is actually on that plane in the photo as I have been sworn to secrecy on it. However I can tell you the blade form changes significantly across the span and is not entirely unlike the VESS design. Of course the other big problem in this design was to get the center of load as close to the center of the prop so the actuator has sufficient force to move it through the +10 to - 10 degrees of pitch. Again our Techy guru Biff picked up on this early on and was actually a motivating factor in the cross sectional design of the blade. Not being a super techy guy myself it is difficult to explain but in basic english if the c of G of the blade is too far forward the prop wants to increase pitch under load by itself. If the c of G is too far back the prop wants to feather. The forces at say 2000 rpm are managable but at 7000 rpm or so not even the largest RC servo at 3300oz can hold it. Thus the guys had to compromise a lot with prop efficiency as opposed to effectiveness. It has been a fine line between success and disaster and of course there has been a fair amount of community service done perfecting this. Guys trust me on this one. Checks in the mail;!!! Kiwi |
|
| | #42 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: San Angelo Texas Age: 18
Posts: 201
|
lol i'm so confused........at least i know this thing exists...whoo hooo....it's almost like the reverse pitch props on small turbo prop aircraft.
|
|
| | #45 (permalink) |
| TATAN ![]() Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Santiago / Chile Age: 36
Posts: 17
|
Kiwi: Que es eso compadre una foto de marcelo con MI GENESIS volando al reves que Honda LOCO, se que es el dia de los inocentes, pero como tanto y en nuestro evento....... |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| help Variable pitch propeller | 3dcrazy | Got Foam?! | 0 | 06-02-2007 12:26 AM |
| Variable Pitch goes BIG!! -->Moved | madmax | Leading Edge Homepage Article Discussions! | 0 | 04-11-2006 01:47 PM |