| | ||||||
| | ||||||
Please support our sponsors | ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
| |||||||
| Groundschool: 3D Flying and Aerobatics Flying, aerobatics, and 3D Huckin'! |
| View Poll Results: QQ 86" Yak or EF 88" Yak | |||
| QQ 86" Yak | | 135 | 41.80% |
| EF 88" Yak | | 188 | 58.20% |
| Voters: 323. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| Gasser Baby ![]() | I voted for the QQ, but that's because I'm building one now. I will Maiden this weekend, and one of my buddies is a well known expert pilot that flew the old (lighter) Extreme Flight for 2 years. I'll give him a pull on the QQ86 and report his comments. We'll do it with and without the SFG's.
__________________ TMan |
| <--Lame Post | |
| | #16 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Does it always do that? ![]() |
![]()
__________________ ![]() How'd I get down here?? www.triplecreekrc.com www.qqaircraft.com www.desertaircraft.com Florida Freestyle Aerobatics Association | ||||||||||||||||||
| <--Lame Post | | ||||||||||||||||||
| | #17 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||
| lee ![]() |
![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
| <--Lame Post | | ||||||||||||||||||
| | #18 (permalink) |
| Flyin' Around ![]() | I have the QQ 102" yak, and have also flown the EF 88" yak. Assuming the 86 QQ flies as well as the 102, then this should be a nice comparison - MY QQ 102 yak was better setup for pattern, but the EF was more stable in harriers. To be honest unless you are a great pilot you won't really notice, they are both brilliant planes from some clever designers. The quality of the EF is much better than my QQ- my QQ yak looked great when it came out of the box, but the cowl and canopy now need constant attention to prevent them cracking up, and paint is starting to flake off the cowl. The foam in the fuz is also starting to crumble away. As a result a 9 month old plane looks more than 2 years old. which is not what you expect for a GDP £ 850 kit. I don't want to slag off QQ planes - maybe mines a one off. But this certainly made my vote a little easier. The EF 88 just sits there and looks great, and you can tell from the quality of the construction and covering that this thing is going to look great for a really long time. So EF certainly wins for me on quality. The biggest plus of the EF 88 is that it is nearly the same size as the QQ 102, and really looks it in the air. So your'e getting more model for your money. The EF yak's cowl, and canopy are pretty well the same size as the 102" QQ yak. see pics attached comparing the cowl size. The EF 88 canopy actually is too big for the 102 yak as you can see! ![]() Check out my picture of my QQ 102 hovering beside the EF 88. For a plane which is nearly half the total cost it's hardly smaller. |
| <--Lame Post | |
| | #19 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Does it always do that? ![]() |
__________________ ![]() How'd I get down here?? www.triplecreekrc.com www.qqaircraft.com www.desertaircraft.com Florida Freestyle Aerobatics Association | ||||||||||||||||||
| <--Lame Post | | ||||||||||||||||||
| | #20 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||
| lee ![]() |
![]() Last edited by leeMcCrory : 04-17-2007 at 11:04 AM. | ||||||||||||||||||
| <--Lame Post | | ||||||||||||||||||
| | #22 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Happy contrails ![]() |
Jeff W.
__________________ BTW, if you takeoff, you will land!!! http://www.extremeflightrc.com http://www.bandegraphix.com http://www.cooperfuels.com | ||||||||||||||||||
| <--Lame Post | | ||||||||||||||||||
| | #24 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Ay Bay Bay! ![]() |
__________________ A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z NEXT TIME WONT YOU SING WITH ME. ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
| <--Lame Post | | ||||||||||||||||||