| | ||||||
| | ||||||
Please support our sponsors | ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
| |||||||
| The Dumb Thumb & The Funky Chicken It happens to the best of us! Discuss your balled up wrecks here. Airplanes and Heli's. |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #25 (permalink) |
| Into The Light I Command Thee ![]() Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: SD
Posts: 593
|
I do not believe it was a CG issue either. I flew my H9 Extra 260 hella tail heavy. At slow speeds, the tail would drop like a poopy dieaper. Spins were flat as a pan cake. The crash was pilot induced. The pilot put himself into a maneuver and did not know how to recover. The more tail heavy, the more maneuverable the plane. But, the pilot must account for the loss of controllability with the correct inputs. Long story short, it was the pilot and not the plane. Keep practicing.
__________________ To Fly or Not to Fly--That is the question.... FLYDawghouseRC.net Po Bro Member #1 |
|
| | #26 (permalink) |
| Flyin' Around ![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 24
| the wing tip is not the place to do it, this is copyed from the manual. 1-Measure back 5" from the leading edge at the root rib and mark the location with a felt-tipped pen on the bottom of the wing. This is the recommended center of gravity (CG). The CG range for your Extra 260 is between 4 3/4 and 5 1/4". 2-Fully assemble the model. With the airplane upright, lift the airplane with your index fingers to find the balance point. The balance point (CG) should be at the mark made at the root rib. If not, add the necessary weight to the nose or tail to obtain the correct balance. (updated wording for #1)- Balancing the Model Step 1 on page 40 of the manual The first sentence should read "On both sides of the fuselage, measure back 5" from the leading edge at the fuselage and mark both places with a felt-tipped pen." if you did it at the tips then it will most likely be off because the extra wing is tapered from root to tip in both thickness and from front to back. that is another reason i use the string deal because its dead center of the front-back and side to side. but i know everybody has their own ways of doing it this is just the easyist way i have found to do it. [/quote] Yes, I measured from the leading edge at the root rib 5" back and marked it. I then followed that mark in a straight-line to the wing tips and balanced from that point. I couldn't think of any other way to do it since that's the only way I was taught. Are you supposed to measure back 5" underneath the wing, mark it, and then hold the airplane up in the air from underneath the wing at the mark next to the root rib?? I never quite understood the balancing instructions for the plane. Last edited by RCFanatic12; 03-26-2008 at 10:58 PM. |
|
| | #27 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Flyin' Around ![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 24
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
| | #28 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Lexington Kentucky U.S.A.
Posts: 1,145
|
maybe I missed it in this thread but what is your "tail spin"? Is it possible that you had a lose bit of covering some were that could flap open and disturb air flow some were? |
|
| | #29 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Flyin' Around ![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 24
|
As far as the covering, I'd inspected the plane many times and I never noticed anything significant. One of the wing tips had some scarred up ultracote from a rough landing, but it wasn't like there was a bunch of loose covering hanging there. Last edited by RCFanatic12; 03-27-2008 at 12:27 AM. | ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
| | #30 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Lexington Kentucky U.S.A.
Posts: 1,145
|
Have you checked the radio for a freak mix that shouldn't be their or a mix that has been altered? The covering issue might be just a seem that wasn't completely down. Also what was the weight of the plane? |
|
| | #31 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Flyin' Around ![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 24
|
As far as the covering, I'm pretty sure everything was securely attached; I wish I could examine it right now, but the plane's just a pile of balsa and torn monokote sitting in the trash can. I weighed the plane just last month and it was about 14.2 lbs. | ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
| | #33 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Central, Ca Age: 46
Posts: 1,003
|
I have never seen a plane go into a violent flat spin on a down line from just a small aileron input as you have stated, no matter where the CG was. I thinking it was something electronic causing this situation to occur when your plane was pointed down. Something grounding, etc that would cause the other servos to go hard over causing this violent flat spin.
|
|
| | #34 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Super Contributer ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Cape Town
Posts: 105
|
I somehow doubt it was your cg. I also have this plane and I balanced it as you did and since then have played around with the cg by moving the battery or using a heavier battery without ever measuring teh cg again. I was happy to do this as the plane exhibited no negative tendencies, just the usual things. The more rearward cg definately increased elevator sensitivity and made landings harder, but had no uncontrollable stability issues at all. How about some kind of airframe issue, like a bent wing tube... | ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
| | #35 (permalink) |
| Doo It! Doo It! ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: johnson city tn. Age: 32
Posts: 94
|
YES very much so it could have been a airframe issue... as most people know the h9 260 glue joints suck!!!!! my first one started to come apart in mid air. we got it almost back to the runway before it went in. in fact it was at joenall 2 years ago. when i got the plane back and started looking into what happend i found the glue was pulling off like a hard rubber. and all the joints was able to be pulled apart and the glue did not even pull any wood. It never bonded with the wood it was just stuck on a very thin part of the surface. and with my 2nd one i found the same thing but i knew what to look for and was able to pull the plane apart with one finger. i literly pulled the former apart by picking it up. so i reglued the entire body before ever flying. i have posted on this in another forum on fg and serville people have had the same problem. i love h9 but the cheep a** glue they use sucks. it took serville flights on my first one before it happend so it could have been one of those that was week and just after some time finaly gave and the body could have started to come apart and caused the tail and wings to twist and that was the end... |
|
| | #36 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Middletown, Delaware Age: 31
Posts: 500
|
Ok heres my take. I too had the same plane and did not like it. It did weird things that I could not understand. Never found anything wrong but just was unstable as at times for no reason. Anyways for the balance issue, I balanced mine like it says in the manual and it kept showing a little nose heavy and then I tried it at the wingtips by making a strait line out the the tips and it was tail heavy everytime? Explain that one. Whats the proper way to check CG? Anyway it finally met an untimely demise at ATL huckfest last year when it broke in half as I pulled up into a wall. Cant say I miss it.
__________________ "The harder you train the luckier you get" - unknown |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| H9 27% Extra 260 ARF | marpman | General Discussions - Giant Scale | 50 | 02-21-2008 06:52 PM |
| Spektrum lost connection with my H9 Extra 260 | redbarret1 | 2.4 Ghz Spread Spectrum Technology | 39 | 01-04-2008 12:36 PM |
| 35% Dalton Extra 260 | WOODisGOOD | Git 'R Dun - Giant Scale! | 229 | 11-13-2007 08:04 PM |
| single 8711 on H9 extra 260 35% | Marroquin | General Discussions - Giant Scale | 9 | 10-18-2007 01:03 PM |
| AW V.S. AM 30% extra 260 wing area. | TonyThomasian | Giant Scale Airframes and Kits | 5 | 09-06-2006 01:38 AM |