| | ||||||
| | ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
| |||||||
| Flight Simulators PC based flight simulation applications, modifications, tips and usage. |
| View Poll Results: G 3.5 or FS one | |||
| Realflight G3.5 | | 134 | 71.66% |
| FS one | | 53 | 28.34% |
| Voters: 187. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #49 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() |
We need an "other" option for this poll..... I loved G3 and G3.5 when it came out, however, I'm not really thrilled with it anymore. Maybe it's just thatI don't have all my planes that I tweaked, but I'm only satisfied. I flew FSOne when it first came out and I wasn't thrilled with it. It was ok, but not like the real thing. It just didn't have that "feel" to it. It could have changed by now... Who knows.. 50%
__________________ Christopher Todd |
|
| | #51 (permalink) |
| Turbine Hucker ![]() Join Date: May 2007 Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 1,341
|
fsone is horrible. too many bugs, poor user interface, lack of planes, and no significant updates from the developers. how long has the expansion pack been promised? Horizon - If you're not going to release a product within a few months, do not advertise it!
|
|
| | #52 (permalink) |
| Gettin' Lower! ![]() Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Austin TX
Posts: 51
|
I had AFPD Pro Deluxe for 2 years, sold it and now I have G3.5. I really think neither of them have physics that truely represent 3D. The cool thing about AFPD is more planes to choose from and its easier to get more planes.... More planes allow you to find one that is closer to the physics you think is real. I think the smaller planes and helicopters are more realistic in G3.5. I think with the bigger planes, its a toss up with a slight edge to AFPD. G3.5 has more software control and has a cool on-line method to join others who are flying. I really like that because eventually you get bored flying by yourself whether at the field or on the Sim. Its also more real word. This is why I traded. Dodging Circle Flyers and helicopters while your on the deck....thats good practice to be able to pull your plane out of harms way. I know because my last real plane got taken out by someone while I was hovering. So the answer to your question is they both have their disadvantages and advantages. You need to define more exactly what you are expecting. |
|
| | #53 (permalink) |
| team aero graphix Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 381
|
I say fsone, I'm friends with michael selig and his step father, michael puts alot of work in on fsone, making the planes, and doing all the math. He truly has an amazing set up trying to get it just right. It just takes time. The reason for lack of planes on fs one is that michael is making them all.
|
|
| | #54 (permalink) |
| Bad-ass Super Contributer! ![]() Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: High Point, NC Age: 32
Posts: 9,190
|
I like the 3.5. I objectivley tried both, over the coarse of a month or so. I feel that FS one's physics are better than 3.5. I am going to switch as soon as I get a computer that can handle it. That is the only drawback to FS1, the CPU usage.
__________________ Team Futaba |
|
| | #55 (permalink) |
| Vertex juggler ![]() Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: SoCal
Posts: 69
|
I've owned almost every sim out there but I still think FS One has the best physics. I think the "Hangar Pack" is available now? LINK Anyway, I am a freelance model maker and one of the companys I do work for is Inertiasoft (the makers of fsone) and I've personally made several of the new planes for FS One including the "Showtime" so I might be a little biased..
|
|
| | #59 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Flyin' Around ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Norway
Posts: 1
|
![]() Trex 600, Logo 500/600, Synergy N9 +++ I must say I'm a bit dissapointed that there haven't been released more airplanes and helis by now. The Flight Pack 1 is also a bit "skinny" IMHO. From a users point of view the sim gets boring real fast without new models being added. If the physics are that complicated and it takes a year to create 10 new models inertiasoft should realy consider hiering more people to create models. | ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| G3 vs FSone vs G3.5 (FSone comparison review) | 50%plane | Flight Simulators | 37 | 05-02-2008 12:08 PM |
| Realflight G3.5 | 50%plane | Flight Simulators | 5 | 09-30-2007 12:03 AM |
| G3.5 problem | Ryguy | Flight Simulators | 2 | 05-12-2007 09:27 PM |
| G3.5 GOES PUBLIC!!!!!! | ShortBus | Flight Simulators | 36 | 11-03-2006 04:02 PM |
| Realflight G3.5 | 50%plane | Flight Simulators | 2 | 09-23-2006 02:57 PM |