| | ||||||
| | ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
| |||||||
| Flight Simulators PC based flight simulation applications, modifications, tips and usage. |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Imac.Thinking outside the box ![]() |
G4 has EXCELLENT graphics....but I tend to prefer AFPD... it takes a bit of tweaking... but I really like it
__________________ EXTREMEFLIGHT R/C Tech support You're just jealous because the voices only talk to me. ....IMAC, its your site! http://www.mini-iac.com/ ......North Georgia IMAC Challenge: www.southeastimac.com |
|
| | #9 (permalink) |
| I can count to potato! ![]() |
G4 in my experience. I never was impressed with AFP's graphics, physics, or general setup.
__________________ The ultimate responsibility of the pilot is to fulfill the dreams of the countless millions of earthbound ancestors who could only stare skyward ...and wish. |
|
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Flyin' Around ![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6
|
G4 must be pretty good if it makes AFPD look so bad to some people. I haven't flown G4 but would like to if it's as good as you guys say. My only negative comment on AFPD is as someone else has mentioned, the unrealistic stall where an aircraft tends to just come down vertically without dropping off into a spin to one side as a real aircraft would. This is also manifested in an unrealistic snap roll, or rather a refusal of a rearward CG aircraft to snap roll realistically. Apart from that AFPD is very impressive to me, especially with helicopters. Cheers GeoffR |
|