| | ||||||
| | ||||||
Please support our sponsors | ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
| |||||||
| General Discussions - Giant Scale Discuss all questions related to Giant Scale Aeromodeling. |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| 3D Aerobatics ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Caguas, Puerto Rico, USA Age: 32
Posts: 165
| Ok guys who can help me with this. And by the way I know it should be 4 min. long (usually) and that you need to change your tempo at least 3-4 times. But beyond that, what else. What tips do you use te time the sequence, what maneuver you should start with, any order of maneuvers?? (Precision first then 3D). Fly high and big or low and close??? Do you get my drift? So, is there any "general guide" or guidelines that can help somebody to construct a free-style routine? I'll appreciate you're input in this matter. Regards, Hector
__________________ Sponsor by my Wallet. Criticized by My Wife!! |
|
| | #3 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||
| 3D Aerobatics ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Caguas, Puerto Rico, USA Age: 32
Posts: 165
|
Hector
__________________ Sponsor by my Wallet. Criticized by My Wife!! | ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Justice ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Whidbey Island, WA Age: 33
Posts: 4,413
|
• 17. Four (4) Minute Freestyle Program. 17.1. The four (4) Minute Freestyle Program is a “Show Time” separate event. It is an unrestricted, individually crated sequence in SCA-6 which “Anything Safe Goes!” To be eligible to participate and compete in this event, the competitor must also compete in one of the five IMAC categories of precision sequence flying at the same event. It should have separate awards when offered. It is graded on the following criteria: A. Technical Merit {90 K} a.1. Complete Use of the Flight Envelope Utilizing the Exploitation of Aerodynamic and Gyroscopic Forces (20 K). The pilot is expected to make full use of the flight envelope of the aircraft. This means flying the full range of airspeeds and accelerations permitted. Program time should be divided between high and low speeds, high and low G maneuvers, and both positively and negatively G loaded flight segments. The flight should include the demonstration of controlled flight beyond the stall boundary by use of autorotation or other high angle of attack maneuvers. The judge will deduct points if any of these areas are noticeable under utilized. The pilot is expected to show movement of the aircraft about all axes using both conventional aerodynamic controls and propeller-generated gyroscopic forces. Higher grades will be given to pilots able to make use of all these effects through a wide range of aircraft attitudes and flight paths. Repeated use of any such forces in the same or similar attitudes should result in lower scores. a.2. Execution of Individual Maneuvers (40 K). It should be clear that the maneuvers flown were, in fact, intended and fully under the pilot’s control. Higher marks will be given for this objective when individual maneuver elements are started and finished on obviously precise headings and in well defined attitudes. When, for example, gyroscopic maneuvers are allowed to decay into imprecise, poorly defined autorotation, marks should be deducted for poor execution. Marks should also be deducted if it appears that the pilot has relinquished control the aircraft at any time. a.3. Wide Variety of Figures Flown on Different Axes and Flight Paths (30 K). Many different figures should be completed in the time available. These should include maneuver elements of many different kinds and should use many different flight paths and axes. Lower marks should be given to a pilot who used only one or two principal axes of flight. However, the use additional axes within the performance zone must be clear and precise, not giving the appearance of being used by chance. Marks should also be deducted if any particular maneuver element is overused or continues for an excessive period of time. For example, higher marks would be given in the event of a two-turn flat spin followed by something else, than to a multi-turn spin that simply took up more time. B. Artistic Impression {90 K}b.1. Pleasing and Continuous Flow of Figures with Contrasting periods of Dynamic and Graceful Maneuvers (50 K). In a precisely flown sequence, the completion of a figure will be well described when movement about an axis ceases and a particular attitude is briefly held. The start of the next figure or maneuver should then begin without any prolonged period of inactivity caused by the need to reposition the aircraft or reorient the pilot. Marks will be deducted for any obvious period of level flight, or inactivity, required between figures. In a musical symphony, the listener’s mood may be changed by contrasting fast and slow movements. Similarly, in a 4-minute Free Program, the judge should be treated to a flight that causes different reactions. While some maneuvers involve very high speeds, sudden attitude changes and rapid rotations, others involve slower speeds or more gentle transitions. Higher marks will be given to a pilot to finds time in his program for showing such differences of mood and pace. Marks should be deducted in this category for a flight that shows no such distinctions. Higher marks should be given for choreography with the music to enhance the flight, and the flight choreographed to enhance and present visual impressions where both the music and aircraft are flowing together with each other and acting as a unified entity to display a harmonious presentation. b.2. Presentation of Individual and Combinations of Figures in Their Best Orientation and Optimal Position (40 K). Figures can give different impressions when seen from different viewpoints. For example, a climbing inverted flat spin looks most impressive when the top surface of the aircraft can be seen. A loop flown in a plane inclined at 45 degrees to the vertical is best appreciated when it is flown on the Y-axis. Marks should therefore be deducted if the judge is not shown a figure in its best orientation. Each figure has an optimum from which it is best viewed. For example, a loop flown SCA-7 overhead does not give the same pleasing geometry as one flown further distant. Similarly, a figure flown near the upper height limit will cause discomfort when flown at the near edge of the performance zone; a low-level horizontal figure is better seen from close by than far away. Higher marks will therefore be given when individual figures are optimally placed, while judges should deduct marks when it appears that a figure is not well placed or positioned. C. Positioning {20 K}c.1. Symmetry of the Presentation Utilizing the Performance Zone to Maximize the Audience and Judges Perception, Reception, and Viewing of the Program (20 K). Highest marks will be given when the sequence as a whole is balanced evenly to the left and right of the judges; direct line of vision towards the center of the performance zone. Marks should be deducted if, by design or by the influence of the wind, a pilot’s program is noticeable biased to left or right. The greater the degree of symmetrical, it may also be spread too far to either side, so that some maneuver elements are flown outside the performance zone, thus making them difficult to see and interpret. Figures may also be flown on the direct line of vision but very distant. Any part of the flight that is flown at such distances should be penalized for each excursion. The entire program should be positioned so as to maximize both the audience and judges perception and reception of the flight as a whole. 17.2. Judging the Four (4) Minute Free Program. a. Any number of judges can be utilized. As more judges that are used, the overall score average will be less influenced by a single judge. It is recommended that seven (7) be used. For final score tabulation it is recommended that the high and low score per judging criteria category be discarded, and the remaining scores by multiplied by their K factors and added together to obtain the final score. b. Each criteria will be judged from ten (10) to zero (0) in 0.1 increments, i.e., 8.7, 7.9, 9.8m etc. c. If the pilot lands any time prior to 3 minutes 30 seconds (three and one-half minutes) the judges score is “prorated.” Example: the pilot lands at the three (3) minute time. The judges will score the contestant as through he flew four minutes. The score room will tabulate the scores normally and the pilot will receive three-fourths (75%) of the judges score for his final score. If the pilot lands any time after three and one-half minutes there is no penalty. The judges will stop scoring when the timer announces “Time” at the four minute mark. Another Example: If the pilot lands at the two minute mark, he will receive 50% of the judges score. d. Specific circumstances that will Disqualify (DQ) the competitor’s flight. d.1. If the plane crashes, it is a Disqualification (DQ). d.2. If the plane goes behind the deadline, it is a DQ. d.3. If the pilot performs dangerous or unsafe maneuvers or high energy maneuvers directed at the judges or spectators, it is a DQ. (As determined by a majority of the judges and/or the CD). Competition Regulations for 2007-2008 As found on the www.mini-iac website (page SCA-5) |
|
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Justice ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Whidbey Island, WA Age: 33
Posts: 4,413
|
Freestyle is not 3-D. Its also not just stick banging. It should look somehwhat fluid with predetermined manuevers set to the music. The manuevers can be violent as in some 3-D stuff but you need to transition to the next move seemlessly. Just ASK QQ........he won the TAS freestyle last year and his sequence was not filled with 3-D. It was a very inspiring sequence though. |
|
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Vertical ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Piqua, OH Age: 26
Posts: 132
|
I constructed mine by finding songs I really liked, splicing them together the way I wanted them, and then placing exciting/dramatic/original maneuvers at specific points in the song that I thought flowed well. That being said, getting the songs I wanted took a good couple of months and getting the maneuvers I wanted mixed in took another several weeks. In fact I've developed quite a few moves now I wish I had a few weeks ago! I also liked presenting maneuvers in unusual angles to the crowd or at unusual times to give a more spectacular quality to the flight. It's tough but when you get it good it sure is fun.
__________________ GTO! The official, unofficial webpage, www.myspace.com/goteamorange http://www.djaerotech.com , check them out! |
|
| | #9 (permalink) |
| 420 SMOEK SUPER-DRI EVERY DAY ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Kingston, NH Age: 22
Posts: 265
|
Try not to use too many pieces of music. It seems like so many pilots have performances that, while they have great technical merit and variety, are choppy, rushed, and not engaging because the song changes ever 20-30 seconds. I think a good freestyle should be flown to no more than three songs.
|
|
| | #11 (permalink) |
| Busted.... DOH!!!! ![]() |
no one has a true freestyle... that is crowd chosen,, go fly and have fun, and who ever draws the best crowd reaction wins.. all these regs make stuff to complicated,, just fly.. mike
__________________ www.hcrcm.org (my flying club......) http://www.outdoorventuresschwinn.com/ WORK Why fly Heli's when airplanes hover just as good! ![]() |
|
| | #12 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3D Aerobatics ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Caguas, Puerto Rico, USA Age: 32
Posts: 165
|
Appreciate all you guys input on this subject. Regards, Hector
__________________ Sponsor by my Wallet. Criticized by My Wife!! | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| IDIOTS | TeamFlatout | The Clubhouse! | 27 | 05-27-2008 03:05 PM |
| Bernd Beschorner Free Style Music? | rc technics | 2006 Tucson Aerobatic Shootout | 5 | 11-30-2006 08:02 PM |
| SEBASTIANO SILVESTRI FREE STYLE | paoloquattrocolo | |||