FlyingGiants - View Single Post - 35% or 37% Avition Model Yak vs Comp-Afk 2.6 Yak

baxternick · 10-04-2006, 09:03 AM

I have owned the 35% yak, and have flown a 2.6 yak a few times. The CA 2.6 seems to track better, and be much more precise. The AM 35% yak was a monster at 3d! I have seen nothing like it. Power was no issue with my 106 on the front of it. This thing had a awesome ability to slow to a crawl in the sky becasue of the huge wing area! My yak weighed in at 29 lbs. We also have the same yak with a da100 on it at the field... He has no problem with power either! So really what you need to decide is do you want a 3d plane that tracks decent, or do you want a plane that is a little bit faster but can do precision with ease?

10-04-2006, 09:03 AM	#5
baxternick ON THE DECK Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Jacksonville, NC Age: 31 Posts: 481 Awards Showcase Total Awards: 1	Re: 35% or 37% Avition Model Yak vs Comp-Afk 2.6 Yak I have owned the 35% yak, and have flown a 2.6 yak a few times. The CA 2.6 seems to track better, and be much more precise. The AM 35% yak was a monster at 3d! I have seen nothing like it. Power was no issue with my 106 on the front of it. This thing had a awesome ability to slow to a crawl in the sky becasue of the huge wing area! My yak weighed in at 29 lbs. We also have the same yak with a da100 on it at the field... He has no problem with power either! So really what you need to decide is do you want a 3d plane that tracks decent, or do you want a plane that is a little bit faster but can do precision with ease?