FlyingGiants - View Single Post - JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

dick hanson · 09-03-2007, 08:03 AM

The resolution--a tricky thing -- In actual use the 2.4 DX2 is very tight feeling
To me ,it is far better than the 1024 72 stuf

The two have to be flown side by side to see effective difference .
One point not many have picked up on - the 2.4 on non digital servos works extremely well .
In my book - I prefer this combo but the digital servo is entrenched in the minds of many -as the best - and there are really only a few high powered non digitals with which to compare .
A 2.4 DX2 and the very inexpensive 126 Sport servo by JRSport -on 6 volts is really quite an eye opener. The 9303 , I have back ordered but my present DX7 does all the basics the same way. Having owned and flown all the various 10 series JR and the 9303 (non 2.4 type) I am confidant the new one will be a excellent unit.

09-03-2007, 08:03 AM	#13
dick hanson Bad-ass Super Contributer! Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: murray utah Posts: 2,114	Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results The resolution--a tricky thing -- In actual use the 2.4 DX2 is very tight feeling To me ,it is far better than the 1024 72 stuf The two have to be flown side by side to see effective difference . One point not many have picked up on - the 2.4 on non digital servos works extremely well . In my book - I prefer this combo but the digital servo is entrenched in the minds of many -as the best - and there are really only a few high powered non digitals with which to compare . A 2.4 DX2 and the very inexpensive 126 Sport servo by JRSport -on 6 volts is really quite an eye opener. The 9303 , I have back ordered but my present DX7 does all the basics the same way. Having owned and flown all the various 10 series JR and the 9303 (non 2.4 type) I am confidant the new one will be a excellent unit.