View Single Post
Old 09-03-2007, 10:29 AM   #15
Zeeb
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Zeeb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pleasant Grove, UT
Age: 61
Posts: 2,077
Awards Showcase
F3A TEAM USA SUPPORTER!: F3A TEAM USA SUPPORTER! - Issue reason: You are BAD ASS, Thank you for supporting the 2009 F3A TEAM USA! 
Total Awards: 1
Default Re: JR-9303 2.4 Field Results

Quote: Originally Posted by Mudsurfer1234
View Post
Here's a newbie question, what's the resolution like on the 9303?

Is it better than 1024 PCM on 72 MHz? as in higher resolution (not response time)
Okay I'm a little fuzzy on this one and I can't find the post right now, besides the fact that it was on "another forum" but IIRC, here's what Danny said about that.

The new X9303 is capable of a 2048 resolution when coupled with either an AR9000 or an R921. The thing I saw which brought this up was a guy who'd previously been using a DX-7 setup with an AR7000 and tried to set it up with his new X9303 and was having some problems. Danny said something to the effect that the tx had to "learn" to use the 1024 resolution for that model match and would not try to broadcast with the higher resolution once set.

So don't shoot me if I missed something on exactly how the system works since I don't have my new X9303 yet, I can't say I've tried it but will do so with the two models I have flying with the DX-7 right now. I will tell you that the "more connected feel" they talk about with the DX-7 vs. a 72MHz system seems to be accurate in my experience with those two models I've already converted. So even if the standard 1024 is all you get, I think you'll be pleasantly surprised at the result. I think Steve mentioned something to that effect in his first post???
Zeeb is offline   Reply With Quote