Well today the BLT Cook-off took place at the TAS. I have to say both competitors presented the judges with quite a powerhouse of culinary fare. Unfortunately a clear victory was not obtained for either party (Madmax or Super Dave). Seems the ugly face of controversy has reared its ugly head in this case.
First the presentations:
Max. Sandwiches constructed of a pile of pork bacon, mayo, lettuce and tomato on white bread. Side was Doritos and a Corona with lime. He has a garnish of an FG flag on a toothpick.
SuperDave: Sandwiches constructed of organic turkey-bacon, Chipotle pepper mayo, heirloom tomatoes, lettuce on toasted whole wheat. Sides were a roasted garlic pasta salad and an all natural organic chocolate chip cookie. He had a garnish of a green olive on a spear. Beverage was a Pyramid Hefeweizen.
Now, according the BLT thread I read here on Giants… the agreed upon judges were Rolling Thunder, Gunshow and 1bwana1. For some reason, Biff came into the equation. The voting went as follows:
Gunshow: SuperDave
Rolling Thunder: SuperDave
1bwna1: Madmax
Right there is a clear Superdave victory, based on the rules in the BLT thread, however, Biff was added and voted for Madmax. So, it would be a tie. At the request of the spectators (not Dave or Max), Spike was asked to make a choice on who won after a short spooning session with Max and a donation to the fund he sided with Max. SuperDave was gracious in accepting the results, but I ask you, fellow Giants… does this sound like a clear victory? I think this situation screams for investigation. The rules clearly stated the judges to be used in the BLT thread. When Max felt the heat of the competition he folded and cheated like a biker in the tour de france. This was a TIE at best.
Rematch?
