FlyingGiants - View Single Post

ryan_m · 01-10-2008, 08:35 AM

I do like the looks of the 55 better, but my primary purpose with it is 3d. I think I might be best off to look for a 54 then from the sounds of it.
My first giant scale plane was the Hangar 9 27% Extra 260. Much too heavy for only 1100 square inches of wing. I have a hard time with that plane. Likes to drop a wing if it gets slow, harriers have lots of wing rock and I just don't have any confidence with it. Buddy of mine has the PAU Yak 54 and it seems to just float by comparison. I was trying to save a few bucks and go with the dawghouse Yak 55, but sounds like I should spend the extra $$ and go for a Yak 54.

01-10-2008, 08:35 AM	#6
ryan_m Uh Oh... Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Little Rock, AR Posts: 60	Re: Yak 54 vs. Yak 55 I do like the looks of the 55 better, but my primary purpose with it is 3d. I think I might be best off to look for a 54 then from the sounds of it. My first giant scale plane was the Hangar 9 27% Extra 260. Much too heavy for only 1100 square inches of wing. I have a hard time with that plane. Likes to drop a wing if it gets slow, harriers have lots of wing rock and I just don't have any confidence with it. Buddy of mine has the PAU Yak 54 and it seems to just float by comparison. I was trying to save a few bucks and go with the dawghouse Yak 55, but sounds like I should spend the extra $$ and go for a Yak 54.