View Single Post
Old 01-26-2008, 09:50 PM   #52
ULTIMATE1
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
ULTIMATE1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada, BC, Comox-Strathcona Regional District
Age: 48
Posts: 1,265
Default Re: 50cc vs. zenoa 62cc??

Quote: Originally Posted by Brave
View Post
Well, my G-62 has arrived and for another $90 from Toni Clark I'll be recieving the 90 degree carb. intake w/gasket and air stack. If all measurements, and all the very useful information here is correct, then there should be a whole lot less cutting on the cowling. I know performance will be an issue with anything other than a two blade prob. but I like the four bladed. Any suggestings??
THIS WOULD ALLOW A SCALE 4 BLADE PROP WITH A HIGH PITCH AT A COST THOUGH ?
TORQUEMASTER £156. Export £131. .€216
SPEED REDUCTION UNIT
for ZENOAH 62
50% Thrust increase, from 20lbs for standard Z62 to around
30 lbs when fitted with Torquemaster.
£154.
1. Bolt-on Unit. no modification to the engine.
2. More torque drives bigger props for increased thrust.
3. Moves the thrust line closer to the centre of the engine.- Easier cowling.
4. Ratio 1.75:1
Thrust - 30 lbs. Weight - 2¾ lbs. Length increase - 2½ in.
Prop shaft is 75 mm above engine shaft. Pulley runs on two ballraces.
Prop .........RPM A well run in engine can give 10% higher RPM.
26 x 8 ......5400 (prop too small. Suggested max RPM - 5100 on prop.
26 x 10 ....5200 (a bit small)
28 x 12 ....4600
28 x 14 ....4400 (takes my 1/3 Camel up vertically!)
30 x 11 ....4000
32 x 12 ....2700 (too big for max power)
MORE INFO ON THE CHAT PAGE
__________________
Brian Mitchell
"If you can't stand behind our Troops, then feel free to stand in front of them!"
ULTIMATE1 is offline   Reply With Quote