View Single Post
Old 02-04-2008, 09:59 PM   #457
XJet
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
XJet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New Zealand
Age: 57
Posts: 832
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Quote: Originally Posted by zoomer260
View Post
Xjet, I'm NOT a basher on this thread I am following with accute interest. But I am wondering why you said a particular system needs failsafe for one airborne craft but not another ? They both can be lethal. Is it because meet rules require it on one but not the other or is it a personal requirement ?
Well it's just a personal preference but I would not feel at all comfortable using any RC system that didn't have failsafe on a model larger than .40-size.

Imagine the mayhem that could ensue if you're taxiing even a 50cc model and got hit by interference -- even a 22x8 spinning at 7K RPMs will make mincemeat of anyone who gets in its way.

All my larger planes have PCM receivers, I keep FM/PPM sets for the smaller "somwhat less" dangerous ones ;-)

Does anyone fly 50cc+ without failsafe these days? Why would you?
XJet is offline   Reply With Quote