FlyingGiants - View Single Post

gareth.ky · 03-10-2008, 01:14 AM

No one has yet shown how the FASST "avoidance" feature works. They claim is will avoid channels with interference but we have yet to see it do that. I suspect it will be very hard to do so. Its transmissions are so short compared to the other noise on the channel its going to be hard to see if it is in fact still using that frequency when noise is introduced. That is one aspect that is worth investigating.

I would also like to know the power output level of the frequency hopping vs. frequency locked devices?

I suppose we should test to failure. What does it take to break the link for XPS, Spektrum and FASST? How likely are those things to happen in the real world outside the lab where devices actually have to obey the 2.4Ghz band rules?

03-10-2008, 01:14 AM	#41
gareth.ky Caymanian Pirate Code Monkey Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Mustang OK, USA Age: 31 Posts: 1,929	Re: Kiwi's XPS test results are up. No one has yet shown how the FASST "avoidance" feature works. They claim is will avoid channels with interference but we have yet to see it do that. I suspect it will be very hard to do so. Its transmissions are so short compared to the other noise on the channel its going to be hard to see if it is in fact still using that frequency when noise is introduced. That is one aspect that is worth investigating. I would also like to know the power output level of the frequency hopping vs. frequency locked devices? I suppose we should test to failure. What does it take to break the link for XPS, Spektrum and FASST? How likely are those things to happen in the real world outside the lab where devices actually have to obey the 2.4Ghz band rules? __________________ *Sawdust* is weight leaving the *airframe. Whether you think you can* or you *can't... your right*.