This is interesting... Here we have a video and the other, someone telling what it does (no test or anything, just saying it does). Which one is false?
http://www.flyinggiants.com/forums/f...tml#post502188
|
Quote: Originally Posted by Kiwi |
|
|
|
|
|
...
Just to reiterate so the facts don't get lost in the jungle of comments here..... NOTE!!! Exact same conditions.
The noise was not ever dumped in a solid burst on any one channel. If you look at the scanner you can see the spread was wide enough that as the noise transitioned across the specktrum each channel was slowly exposed. It was never hit with a solid burst such as a video transmitter etc would do.
XPS stopped functioning every time.... |
|
|
|
|
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showt...90#post8941390
|
Quote: |
|
|
|
|
skubacb
Again it is a twisting of the facts. The jumping is preemptive. IE it looks ahead to see what channels are clear and IF the noise floor is increasing it WILL jump to a new channel as necessary.
What you are getting is a twisting of the facts. The system works exactly as we were told it would.
I accept what Jim has told us about the system because what he has told us is what the system does. |
|
|
|
|