View Single Post
Old 07-13-2008, 02:01 PM   #1237
wrightme
I don't do "custom" user title
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 102
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Quote: Originally Posted by Wojcigitty
View Post
To be fair, if I bought XPS and lost an airplane to it, I'd probably have a vendetta as well.

These threads have been very enlightening, but at a hundred pages, it's getting redundant (except for Toumal's "In first approximation, a cow is a spherical object that emits equal amounts of milk in all directions.")
To be fair, if I bought a plane and placed any radio system in it, and it crashed, I would attempt to recreate the events and actually try and figure out what went wrong.

In fact, I crashed an XPS-equipped plane this morning!

I had full control all the way to destruction, when the wing disintegrated. I even had control to go to minimum throttle before the lack of a wing caused premature landing, in a non-optimal manner.

You place it in the air, it will land, whether you cause the landing, or not. We always hope nothing will go wrong. Today's crash was my first. I have used 72mhz Berg, Futaba, Hitec, and 2.4 Ghz Spektrum and XPS. With either Spektrum or XPS, I simply have no unintended control movements, and I do not worry when others are at the flightline with their TX. With 72, I had frequent unintended control movements.

Bottom line? If you don't like XPS, fine, but choose your alternative and move on. Vendettas and obsessions aren't healthy.
wrightme is offline   Reply With Quote