FlyingGiants - View Single Post

Jim Woodward · 10-18-2009, 07:52 AM

I have the D300 ML DA 170/RE3 combo, and my flying partner has the standard D300. Both are very good, but the ML is the "king of the hill" right now. It was in use quite a bit at the 2009 TAS, won several classes including Invitational. This plane is awesome for sequence flying - and has withstood the naysayers crys of being out of scale. I just ordered a 2nd ML kit myself. The longer fuselage really shows up in overall tracking. There is more side area for rolls, rolling circles, etc.
Thanks,
Jim W.

10-18-2009, 07:52 AM	#6
Jim Woodward Bad-ass Super Contributer! Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 1,128	Re: Dalton 300 vs Dalton 300ML I have the D300 ML DA 170/RE3 combo, and my flying partner has the standard D300. Both are very good, but the ML is the "king of the hill" right now. It was in use quite a bit at the 2009 TAS, won several classes including Invitational. This plane is awesome for sequence flying - and has withstood the naysayers crys of being out of scale. I just ordered a 2nd ML kit myself. The longer fuselage really shows up in overall tracking. There is more side area for rolls, rolling circles, etc. Thanks, Jim W. __________________ Team Futaba / Dalton Aviation / Desert Aircraft / YS Parts & Service / Budd Engineering / Smart-Fly / Competitionairframes.com / Netbox Hobby