Welcome to The FlyingGiants! - please login or click this bar to join our community...

 

Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!!

Go Back   FlyingGiants > R/C Topics > Sailplane Talk
Forgot your password? Create a new account


View Poll Results: Use Std Ultracote or Ultracote Parklite for 2X4 Glider?
Use std Ultracote for the added durability. 1 50.00%
Use Ultracote Parklite for light weight & best performance. 1 50.00%
Voters: 2. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-22-2012, 06:35 PM   #1
SrTelemasterTyro
Who's Up 4 Strokin' It?
 
SrTelemasterTyro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: United States, NY, Brasher Falls-Winthrop
Age: 63
Posts: 91
Default Use Std Ultracote or Ultracote Parklite for 2X4 Glider?

I'm building a small sailplane for my grandaughter.

49 1/2" wingspan, probably 4 channels (rudder, elevator & 2 channels for aileron diff) W/Hitec 05S micro RX & HS-55 servos. I am going to use 1 micro servo in each wingtip for aileron differential & whatever size Nmh battery pack in the nose that will balance it out.

I am considering using Ultracote Parklite for covering to keep weight down. It's spec'ed @ 28oz W/1983 era radio equipment (2 servos). The author quoted 10oz for his radio equipment.


Is the weight savings of the Ultracoat Parklite worth the diminished durability? A roll of standard Ultarcote wieghs about 3.6oz while the roll of Parklite weighs about .5 oz. Since I will use almost all of the roll on the plane, I can save nearly 3oz AUW by using the Parklite.
I figure that I can save about 8oz total W/the lighter batteries/radio equipment & covering.
__________________
Saito FA91S CDI, Saito FA150 CDI, Saito FA180 CDI, Saito FA180HC CDI
Saito FA300TTDP CDI, Saito 200Ti CDI: 15% Cool Power Glow Fuel, Not a Glow Plug in the Bunch!
SrTelemasterTyro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 07:53 AM   #2
AEAJR
Thermal Hunter
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: United States, NY, New York
Posts: 212
Default

The weight of the roll is only useful if they are exactly the same size rolls and have the same weight tube inside.

The weight savings are probably not worth the difference in durability.
AEAJR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 08:23 AM   #3
rcpilot82
It's Sooo Fluffy!!
 
rcpilot82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Western, pa, usa
Posts: 3,044
Default

Quote: Originally Posted by SrTelemasterTyro
View Post
I'm building a small sailplane for my grandaughter.

49 1/2" wingspan, probably 4 channels (rudder, elevator & 2 channels for aileron diff) W/Hitec 05S micro RX & HS-55 servos. I am going to use 1 micro servo in each wingtip for aileron differential & whatever size Nmh battery pack in the nose that will balance it out.

I am considering using Ultracote Parklite for covering to keep weight down. It's spec'ed @ 28oz W/1983 era radio equipment (2 servos). The author quoted 10oz for his radio equipment.


Is the weight savings of the Ultracoat Parklite worth the diminished durability? A roll of standard Ultarcote wieghs about 3.6oz while the roll of Parklite weighs about .5 oz. Since I will use almost all of the roll on the plane, I can save nearly 3oz AUW by using the Parklite.
I figure that I can save about 8oz total W/the lighter batteries/radio equipment & covering.

Info gathereed from HH website:
http://www.horizonhobby.com/products...red-HANU866#t1
http://www.horizonhobby.com/products...e-red-HANU0815

True red standard ultracoat = 0.30 oz/sq.ft.
True red parklite ultracoat = 1.07 oz/sq. YD (this equates to .119 oz/sq.ft.)
Based on using the whole roll, no waste (78"x23" or 12.458 sq. ft.) toal weights would be..

standard: 3.737 oz of material
parklite: 1.483 oz of material
savings would be 2.254 oz per roll

IMO since you are using standard equipment and it is for a child, I would use standard ultracoat for durability. That being said the thickness of the materials are different however I could not find data on standard ultracoat.

standard: Not listed?
parklite: 13 microns thickness
__________________
KUSTOM AERO DESIGNS
http://kustomaerodesign.weebly.com/index.html

Laser Cutting & Engraving Services
From Prototype to Production
rcpilot82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2006 Tequila Cup (Full Scale IAC) Bill_Higgins Full Scale Huckin' 4 11-10-2006 09:25 AM
DA 100 Airframe needed!! airborneSGT Airframes and Kits 3 06-18-2006 04:13 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 AM.

All Flyinggiants.com content copyright 2006-2014 by RCGroups.com, LLC except where otherwise indicated. The Flyinggiants.com logo is a trademark of RCGroups.com, LLC.
Please report any misuse of our trademarks or copyright violations using the contact form.
RCGroups Network :: RCGroups :: The E Zone :: Lift Zone :: RC Power :: Crackroll :: RC Cars

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.