|
| ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
|
|||||||
|
|
#16 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: murray utah
Posts: 2,114
|
you can use more than one rx -IF you stay on same TX model --this is a reply from P Beard - on RC Groups - we asked that same question - you don't need to do them at the same time -binding one after another is fine.
also 6100 and 7000 rx will bind together 6000 will not bind using either - the reason is the protocol for 6000 is different (early type ). send him an Email if in question. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Flyin' Around
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dublin ireland
Posts: 2
|
can you please elaborate why you think this? I am considering two Rxs and two batteries/switch harnesses. I was thinking also why not join them up across the common power lines? So now its not either/or but a hybrid of both. I suppose it boils down to the relative frequency and probable consequences of each type of failure, for example a shorted servo would probably knock out the lot, but if the two systems were totally separate then the model ought to remain controllable? here are the bones of an outcome matrix which for the present exclude power expanders, regulators; things I would rather not have unless they show an reliability advantage: Type of failure Type of setup One cell or switch o/c One cell shorted Rx down Single Rx, twin NIMH, SW harnesses survive Probable survival Bye-bye Two Rxs each with single NiMH& Switch survive Probable survival survive Two Rxs each with single NiMH& Switches and power cable interconnect survive Probable enhanced survival due to all servos powered Probable survival. Depends on what the wayward Rx tried to do Drat! I don't know how to make this read like a table, maybe someone can show how? I tried pasting from WORD and also tabs, no use. these were the setups, and it's a 4x4 table in WORD 3 Types of setup: 1) Single Rx, twin NIMH, SW harnesses 2) Two Rxs each with single NiMH& Switch 3) Two Rxs each with single NiMH& Switches and power cable interconnect apologies for the poor formatting again. Last edited by heli; 03-26-2007 at 07:29 PM. Reason: mangled format |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#18 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() |
My setup in my Aeroworks 33% Edge 540T, using the DX7
1. throttle 2. ailerons both "y" 3. elevator left 4. rudder 2 in rudderbox pp "y" 5. elevator right 6. rx battery #1 7. rx battery #2 With that setup it was easy to program and works great!
__________________
Team Performance Aircraft Unlimited Desert Aircraft / Team Hacker Brushless Motors 4titude RC Fuel Tanks / Vess Aero Higher Plane Productions Jamie Hicks |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Super Weight Freak
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Antonio Texas
Age: 55
Posts: 2,785
|
I am running two in my airplane with no problems to report.
Bob |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Workin' the pole
![]() |
![]()
__________________
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| JR-9303 2.4 Field Results | 1bwana1 | Radios | 186 | 08-22-2011 03:23 AM |
| Dual RX question | Vic3D | Radios | 10 | 12-26-2007 01:44 PM |
| dual RX battery question | landshark | Onboard Electronics | 10 | 07-17-2007 09:06 AM |
| Dual Receiver's on 2.4 GHz | Dean Allison | Australia | 20 | 04-03-2007 12:39 AM |
| 2.4 ghz RX for 35% plane | yakwrecker | Radios | 4 | 01-03-2007 05:06 PM |