|
| ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
|
|||||||
|
|
#331 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: morton grove illinois
Posts: 269
|
My understanding of it is that the 12z will be going away in the future.
Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
#332 |
|
Flyin' Around
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: IA
Age: 38
Posts: 14
|
Still need definite answer. Will the retrofit modules be as fast as the built in systems?
Will there be any differences? How would the swap to 72mhz work with the antenna? |
|
|
|
|
|
#333 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: morton grove illinois
Posts: 269
|
My understanding is the antenna will be just like the antenna on a 12 or 14. If you have the 2.4 module in, you remove the regular antenna. If you are on other bands 35/72/50mhz you use the regular antenna. This is all what I was told by one of the reps at toledo. Time will tell.
Mike Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
#334 |
|
Sink Stinks!!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 3,850
|
The 12FG has about 99% of the programming features of the 12Z. It uses a 1700 NiMH TX battery versus the 2200 lithium pack in the 12Z. It has an SD card and not a CF card for extra storage (and I understand that you CANNOT transfer a program form the 12Z & 14MZ to the 12FG). Honestly you have to look pretty hard to see the differences.
There is an accurate photo of it here: http://2.4gigahertz.com/systems/futk9200.html I have not heard any rumors of the demise of the 12Z, but it could be since the two radios are so similar. Resolution and latency of the 2.4 module are reported to be the same as if the RF deck were in the radio itself and are on par with that of the 2048 PCM system, which is excellent. Swapping bands will be a snap. Simply put the regular antenna in when using a 72 module, take it off when using SS.
__________________
Team Futaba I get free Tee shirts, so I must be lying ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#335 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Flyin' Around
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 5
|
They will price the 12FG slightly less than the 12Z, then kill the 12Z, leaving you the choice of the premium 14MZ or the slightly ghetto 12FG. Last edited by santaqwerty; 04-27-2007 at 05:36 PM. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#336 |
|
Flying Loan Shark
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Great State of Texas
Posts: 38
|
So the 12FG must still be PPM if it uses the module and can still use 72 mhz. So the "purpose built systems that are all digital" must still have better latency?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#337 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Sink Stinks!!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 3,850
|
In fact, I am willing to bet that if the 12Z IS dropped it is in favor of the 12FG, which offers nearly the same performance but at a lower cost, and even lower for Futaba since it uses less expensive batteries, etc.
__________________
Team Futaba I get free Tee shirts, so I must be lying ![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#338 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Sink Stinks!!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 3,850
|
The latency and resolution of the SS will be as good as the 2048, which is among the best out there right now, including the SS radios.
__________________
Team Futaba I get free Tee shirts, so I must be lying ![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#339 |
|
Flying Loan Shark
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Great State of Texas
Posts: 38
|
I thought that the stick movement was sent to the module in PPM, then digitized and sent. The purpose built systems do not need to translate hence lower latency. The Spektrum and XPS modules require the transmitter be in PPM mode.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#340 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Sink Stinks!!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 3,850
|
According to Futaba, whatever module you choose to use makes it that type of system. What makes it a SS system is in the module. Having it "built into" the TX would not make a difference. This is evidenced by their claim that the module system performs identically to the "purpose built" 6 channel system.
__________________
Team Futaba I get free Tee shirts, so I must be lying ![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#341 |
|
Flying Loan Shark
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Great State of Texas
Posts: 38
|
Ok, they have been doing 2.4 for a while so a 14mz with a 2.4 module would seem to be the most flexible way to go.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#342 |
|
Pro Pit Biotch
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sugar Hill, GA.
Age: 45
Posts: 3,165
|
I want them all......Modules, transmitters, receivers......
__________________
Extreme Flight RC www.extremeflightrc.com Aircraft International www.aircraftinternational.com Higher Plane Productions Mercury Adhesives Johnson Aviation |
|
|
|
|
|
#343 |
|
Pro Pit Biotch
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sugar Hill, GA.
Age: 45
Posts: 3,165
|
I dont see Futaba dropping the 12Z anytime soon....Not everyone is going to run out and buy 2.4....Especially when 72mhz will be freed up much more as more people go 2.4, not to mention the number of people with PPM/PCM in a bunch of planes that arent going to just put new receivers in their planes. It would cost me a small fortune to pull out all of my 72mhz receivers and replace them with 2.4 ones.....so I am in no hurry.
__________________
Extreme Flight RC www.extremeflightrc.com Aircraft International www.aircraftinternational.com Higher Plane Productions Mercury Adhesives Johnson Aviation |
|
|
|
|
|
#344 |
|
Sink Stinks!!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 3,850
|
Which is exactly why I like the idea of having the flexibility to transition at my own pace by using a 2.4 module along with my 50 and 72 band modules.
I agree that the 12Z is likely not going to be dropped. But who knows. The 12FG will be a great radio and offer the same flexibility of band swapping via modules with no loss of performance.
__________________
Team Futaba I get free Tee shirts, so I must be lying ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#345 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Left Coast
Age: 50
Posts: 3,713
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Anyone using Futaba TM-7 Modules yet? | klhoard | Radios | 39 | 04-18-2011 12:32 PM |
| I got a new Futaba 12FG and have a few issues | dubd | Radios | 19 | 05-01-2009 06:35 PM |
| Where to get futaba 12fg in the States! | b0Bro' | General Discussion | 5 | 04-16-2008 10:18 PM |
| Futaba 2.4 Ghz modules | karlwatt | Radios | 4 | 03-29-2007 03:34 PM |
| New Futaba 2.4ghz Modules for Futaba Module-based radios!!! | futurase | Radios | 42 | 03-29-2007 03:30 AM |