|
| ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
|
|||||||
|
|
#106 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Doo It! Doo It!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denmark
Age: 35
Posts: 78
|
Hmmm - the plot thickens! Again, if using PPM, I will get a Spectrum module just in spite!
__________________
"Perfectly level flying is the supreme challenge of the scale model pilot."
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#107 |
|
Uber Contributer
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Walker La
Posts: 165
|
I want one
|
|
|
|
|
|
#108 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() ![]() |
Tor,
I'm not the full bullet on all the features with the new system but I have some idea of whats in it. The 14MZ and 12Z modules apparently will use the native Futaba pin out so your going to have 2048 resolution on either PPM or PCM. I dont see what all the fuss is really about as both a extremely fine resolution. Correct me if I'm wrong here but the 2048 and 1024 refers to the maximum steps recognised within the radio of each of the gimbals. The modules in the 12 and 14 are currently able to use that and transmit it. Thats why if you cut back your ATV your really killing your resolution. That has nothing to do with whats being transmitted, it just means you have narrowed the amount of steps you can send to the servo. In short a measure of how fine your contol can be. Funny thing is most of todays top servos are only good for 900 or so steps. Work that one out. Now latency is an altogether other story. Thats the time it takes for the signal to be recognised, digitized and transmitted. PPM is raw and fast. PCM is packets, coded, shaken and rattled and transmitted. If the numbers dont match you get a lock out or fail safe. The G3 Futaba system got PCM to outstanding transmission times. Twice as fast as the conventional PPM in fact. So the 2.4 system should have reduced latency, faster data processing (2048). I dont see how the other guys system can be better or worse in any way what so ever, plus it will only be an 8 channel system and not 14. If I was that pedantic about it I would buy a 7 channel and save some funds. Guys we will try to get a Futaba rep in here to help answer your questions in much better detail but please remember these guys are home tonight, its Easter Friday here tomorrow so thats a holiday and likely a black hole for information as well. If however we locate a guru lets give him a chance to come in and answer your concerns accordingly. Kiwi |
|
|
|
|
|
#109 |
|
Doo It! Doo It!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denmark
Age: 35
Posts: 78
|
Kiwi, I fully agree that resolution is a non issue.
But as you said the latency of G3 is less than PPM and outstanding in that way. No way I am going to get a module that uses PPM for internal communication between the module and the transmitter. If this is the case, I think Futaba took the easy road and screwed the 12/14 users in the process. Edit: But peace out! Let's hear it from the source before jumping to conclusions....
__________________
"Perfectly level flying is the supreme challenge of the scale model pilot."
Last edited by Tor; 04-05-2007 at 10:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#110 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Age: 52
Posts: 204
|
I Have my 12z in for service. I want to be upgraded
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
.
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,100
|
If PPM is faster anyway then PCM, and with 2.4ghz you don't have the concern of getting shot down, then where is the problem? |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#112 |
|
Flyin' Around
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: el cajon, Mexifornia
Age: 21
Posts: 23
|
FUTABA
Looks like they caught up on the ball!!! My 12 is gonna see either a upgrade or a module BABY All the more reasons to fly futaba!!!! Spektrum aint got nothing on us baby!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#113 |
|
.
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,100
|
Alright guys, Max has already asked that we don't drag this thread down by attacking ANY manufacturers, so please let's keep it friendly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#114 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() ![]() |
Tor,
I think we are flogging a dead horse here. The modules for the 12 and 14 are 2.4 Ghz and 2048. Wheres the easy road and how does that screw the 14 and 12 owners out here. Guys you dont need to send your radio in for any modifications. These modules are plug and play. I suppose there might be a software upgrade to tell the radio your on 2.4 but I dont know that for sure. And of course you will still have your 72Mhz modules and rx's for those other planes in the hanger. Its a win win situation. I dont see anyway anyones getting screwed here, quite the opposite in fact. Kiwi |
|
|
|
|
|
#115 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: St Peters Missouri
Age: 53
Posts: 891
|
Awefully strong language on something you have no personal knowledge of! It was stated by Frank Noll Jr who would have personal knowledge "When using the 12Z & 14MZ modules the processing speed will be equal to the current systems. You can figure everything that the 12 & 14 does now, will continue with the 2.4 FASST modules." Futaba has more than done right by the consumer by not just launching a new 12FG 2.4, but also supporting past customers with an easy upgrade for their present equipment. As my Dad would say, "I think you need to cool your jets".
__________________
Mark Trent Team Futaba Team Flight Power Krill Aircraft Skyline Aviation Hacker Brushless Fromeco Last edited by JagerBomb; 04-05-2007 at 11:18 PM. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#116 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Flyin' Around
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: el cajon, Mexifornia
Age: 21
Posts: 23
|
Ok Ok if you must. ![]() ![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#117 |
|
.
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,100
|
I must
|
|
|
|
|
|
#118 |
|
Flyin' Around
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: el cajon, Mexifornia
Age: 21
Posts: 23
|
Fine with me
|
|
|
|
|
|
#119 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Doo It! Doo It!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denmark
Age: 35
Posts: 78
|
I don't want to jump to conclusions, as I edited and wrote in my previous post. Let's see what Futaba says.
__________________
"Perfectly level flying is the supreme challenge of the scale model pilot."
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#120 |
|
Super Contributer
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Florence, Al
Posts: 103
|
Would it be possible to have an old FM module out of say a 9CAP and revert the 12 back to FM when not flying with a 2.4 RX?
Jeff www.CommonSenseRC.com |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Anyone using Futaba TM-7 Modules yet? | klhoard | Radios | 39 | 04-18-2011 12:32 PM |
| I got a new Futaba 12FG and have a few issues | dubd | Radios | 19 | 05-01-2009 06:35 PM |
| Where to get futaba 12fg in the States! | b0Bro' | General Discussion | 5 | 04-16-2008 10:18 PM |
| Futaba 2.4 Ghz modules | karlwatt | Radios | 4 | 03-29-2007 03:34 PM |
| New Futaba 2.4ghz Modules for Futaba Module-based radios!!! | futurase | Radios | 42 | 03-29-2007 03:30 AM |