|
| ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
|
|||||||
|
|
#46 |
|
Father of the Scale Furum
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chapel Hill, TN
Age: 34
Posts: 4,577
|
Beautiful plane, but it just looks heavy. I looked at one in person and man.. it just looks heavy, but well built..
__________________
"I'll have the roast duck with the mango salsa" Kit builders check out.... http://bobflies.com/ 2.4 GHz is for your home telephone... 14MZ and 72 MHz for huckin' baby!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Your my boy Blue!!!1
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lexington Kentucky U.S.A.
Posts: 4,209
|
were did it look heavy heres apic bodywerks posted of the inside of the fuse
__________________
Thanx to The Crew Mike B. Jim Z. Ed J. Jim S. Airman Wheels www.jerseymodeler.com lazertoyz.com Last edited by Flatlandman; 03-06-2006 at 03:11 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson
Age: 36
Posts: 5,229
|
I think it's because the fuse is so darn fat. I have only gotten one non-aeroworks employed weight report thus far, but it was on a bathroom scale, not a postal scale. He said it was 27# with all servos, dual 4800's on the Rx and a smoke pump. If that is accurate, it ain't bad, but being a bathroom scale, I don't know.
I have seen a video of a customer flying his, and it definitely flew light and had absolutely ZERO problems with vertical. Trust me, if you sealevel guys want real quality and very good performance, keep your eye on their new line of ARF's, including this one. As for me, I'll have to wait til I move to Tucson (if it happens) before I can own one.
__________________
Gmoney and Smarks are spooners |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |||||||||||||||
|
I'm Watching You!
![]() ![]() |
__________________
"Hey at Joe Nall I personally saw Tank kick a kitten in the face!" --66Stang J'Tec Radiowave 3D HobbyShop Aircraft International |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
#50 | |||||||||||||||
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dumont, NJ USA
Age: 49
Posts: 932
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
#51 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson
Age: 36
Posts: 5,229
|
Must have...still, you need to compare apples to apples. The DA is a pound heavier on stock muffs than your ZDZ on a can, and you didn't say whether your 2.6 extra had smoke or not, dual or single servos everywhere, or what kind of batteries.
I already know that this plane is a tad heavy compared to some of the other WOOD ARF offerings, but 27 pounds for sealevel flying is very respectable, and it is just about the nicest-looking ARF I have seen in a while of this size, aaand it is still 2 pounds lighter that a stock-built Carden.
__________________
Gmoney and Smarks are spooners |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dumont, NJ USA
Age: 49
Posts: 932
|
Just finished AW Extra 260.
Equipment: DA100, MTW TD75K canister setup with stock length non-flex 70mm drop header ( left one cut 1/4" to clear LG bulkhead) 7 5955 on surfs ( 1 more may go on rudder ) 5.4v miracle swith with fromeco 2400mah li-ion on ignition 7.4v lipo 4000mah on power expander ( no regulator other than PE to receiver at 5v ) Stock tube, LG, TG Dry Weight 28.5lb without wheep pants. That means 27.0-27.5lb with stock muffler or 25.0-25.5lb with bme110 |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dumont, NJ USA
Age: 49
Posts: 932
|
There was minor snag on engine testing. No fire and no sucking fuel.
No fire was traced to bad hall sensor module. Trouble shooting sequence. 1. check fuel line for sign of fuel in line or smell 2. check ignition batt voltage through charge port. 3. check ignition voltage through output side of ignition switch. 4. pull the plug out and put in the spark plug cap ( no need to ground and the shild provides return path) and flip prop while holding spark plug so the gap is visible. 5. if spark is there check for fuel related problems. 6. If no spark, check for power in the ignition module ( checking bad contact ) by using multimeter by poking with the probe on wire Now the problem is narrowed down to ignition module or pickup sensor. 7. ignition module from DA50 was first tested to see if it works ( spark ) 8. It was plugged to da100 picup sensor with plug in the cap and batt connected 9. No fire! so we have a bad pickup sensor. 10. Although PS is bad, ignition module should be checked also as there is a double failure is possibility. 11. da100 ignition with batt and spark connected to cap is plugged into da50 pickup sensor. Fire! ok so there is only bad pickup sensor. This is rather disapointing as the engine leaves factory bench tested. I will call DA on monday to straighten this issue. Meanwhile, pickup sensor from 2nd da100 will be fitted rather than swapping the engine. The fuel sucking issure bothers me a bit but will worry about it after firing the engine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
I have Issues
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,311
|
Red this is a new 100 ?
__________________
"Professional KeyBoard Pilot" |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dumont, NJ USA
Age: 49
Posts: 932
|
After many many flips, I decided to check to see if there is fuel inside of diaphram. To my surprise the diaphram was not engaged to the valve and it was completely dry. Can an engine leave the factory tested with completely dry diaphram with the valve disengaged?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dumont, NJ USA
Age: 49
Posts: 932
|
Extra 260 comes with thin ( relative ) gage al gear with center section punched out. I normally machine out between bolts on one piece gear to reduce weight. It is close to ( forgot to weigh ) 1/2 the weight of AW Katana LG so you may not save much if any weight by going to CF LG.
If the rain stops I'll go outside and test fire the engine and possibly go for a maiden today. |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | |||||||||||||||
|
I have Issues
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,311
|
__________________
"Professional KeyBoard Pilot" |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
#59 |
|
Flyin' Around
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Peru, Illinois
Age: 54
Posts: 8
|
I didn't read every thread here but I did see you were going for the Graph Tech Gear for the main gear! Don't expect the gear to hold up. Go back to your Aluminum gear. Mill it out to lighten it and you'll be happier. My 36% Katana just took a dive on Graph Tech new and improved 3D weave gear and I was in a little side wind, about 12mph, but the gear snapped off on one side about 4" up from my wheel just on one side. It then continued to tear out the rest of the gear and rip up the under side of fuse. Luckily I had just removed the wheel pants to do some repair work on them. If I had the stock gear on the plane I would be out today flying it!
I also took off the new and improved 3D weave gear from my F-90. Back to dependable aluminum it will bend a little or bounce but won't break! No more CF gear for me! Too many failures. Mike, at Graph Tech says the new ones wont break. I've got 2 sets to send him. |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson
Age: 36
Posts: 5,229
|
do a bad enough landing and anything will break! I will definitely agree that CF is only for people who land consistantly, and softly, and are willing to sacrifice a little durabilty to shave weight, like me! For me every ounce counts!
__________________
Gmoney and Smarks are spooners |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|