Welcome to The FlyingGiants! - please login or click this bar to join our community...

HobbyKing.com New Products Flash Sale
 

Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!!

Go Back   FlyingGiants > Giant Scale Planes > Build Threads
Forgot your password? Create a new account


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-06-2006, 01:19 PM   #46
GremlinX
Father of the Scale Furum
 
GremlinX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chapel Hill, TN
Age: 34
Posts: 4,577
Default Re: AEROWORKS 35% 260, assembly, discussion, and flying thread

Beautiful plane, but it just looks heavy. I looked at one in person and man.. it just looks heavy, but well built..
__________________
"I'll have the roast duck with the mango salsa"

Kit builders check out....
http://bobflies.com/

2.4 GHz is for your home telephone... 14MZ and 72 MHz for huckin' baby!!
GremlinX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 01:59 PM   #47
Flatlandman
Your my boy Blue!!!1
 
Flatlandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lexington Kentucky U.S.A.
Posts: 4,209
Default Re: AEROWORKS 35% 260, assembly, discussion, and flying thread

were did it look heavy heres apic bodywerks posted of the inside of the fuse
Attached Thumbnails
  • Click image for larger version

Name:	aw2601.jpg
Views:	201
Size:	232.8 KB
ID:	4795 232.8 KB · Views: 201

__________________
Thanx to The Crew Mike B. Jim Z. Ed J. Jim S.
Airman Wheels
www.jerseymodeler.com
lazertoyz.com

Last edited by Flatlandman; 03-06-2006 at 03:11 PM.
Flatlandman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 03:06 PM   #48
bodywerks
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
bodywerks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson
Age: 36
Posts: 5,229
Default Re: AEROWORKS 35% 260, assembly, discussion, and flying thread

I think it's because the fuse is so darn fat. I have only gotten one non-aeroworks employed weight report thus far, but it was on a bathroom scale, not a postal scale. He said it was 27# with all servos, dual 4800's on the Rx and a smoke pump. If that is accurate, it ain't bad, but being a bathroom scale, I don't know.
I have seen a video of a customer flying his, and it definitely flew light and had absolutely ZERO problems with vertical. Trust me, if you sealevel guys want real quality and very good performance, keep your eye on their new line of ARF's, including this one. As for me, I'll have to wait til I move to Tucson (if it happens) before I can own one.
__________________
Gmoney and Smarks are spooners
bodywerks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 05:12 PM   #49
TheTank
I'm Watching You!

 
TheTank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Connecticut, USA
Age: 31
Posts: 10,144
Awards Showcase
FlyingGiants Good Dude Award: For stepping up to the plate, being a part of a fundraising effort for a good cause. Thank you. - Issue reason: Thank you very much for helping with the recent donation drive. Super-Huck!: Presented for incredible contributions from our members, to our community. - Issue reason: For bringing back the incredible action from the 2006 Don Lowe Masters in form of photos, writeups, and mass quantities of videos for all of our enjoyment. 
Total Awards: 2
Send a message via AIM to TheTank
Default Re: AEROWORKS 35% 260, assembly, discussion, and flying thread

Quote: Originally Posted by gstjohn
I was just on Composite-arf.com website and the 2.3M is designed to be around 20-22lbs. so I am only 2lbs heavier, which could be a mix of a lot of things. paint I know only added 1/2 lb. I have also added a carbon/balsa sandwiched brace across the Landing gear for added rigidity. I have also added carden landing gear cuffs, and of course a smoke system with a 24oz tank. so by adding all of those small things up I can see adding an extra 2lbs.
WOW! My 2.6m Comp Arf weighs 23.5 pounds dry with a ZDZ80/cannister combo.
__________________
"Hey at Joe Nall I personally saw Tank kick a kitten in the face!" --66Stang

J'Tec Radiowave
3D HobbyShop
Aircraft International
TheTank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 06:20 PM   #50
red_z06
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
red_z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dumont, NJ USA
Age: 49
Posts: 932
Default Re: AEROWORKS 35% 260, assembly, discussion, and flying thread

Quote: Originally Posted by TheTank
WOW! My 2.6m Comp Arf weighs 23.5 pounds dry with a ZDZ80/cannister combo.
Hmm you must have a lighter airframe. My yak with bme110 (1lb less) and stock muffler (6oz lighter than your can) with 10oz receiver pack, 5oz ignition pack came in at 24.5lb
red_z06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 07:00 PM   #51
bodywerks
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
bodywerks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson
Age: 36
Posts: 5,229
Default Re: AEROWORKS 35% 260, assembly, discussion, and flying thread

Must have...still, you need to compare apples to apples. The DA is a pound heavier on stock muffs than your ZDZ on a can, and you didn't say whether your 2.6 extra had smoke or not, dual or single servos everywhere, or what kind of batteries.
I already know that this plane is a tad heavy compared to some of the other WOOD ARF offerings, but 27 pounds for sealevel flying is very respectable, and it is just about the nicest-looking ARF I have seen in a while of this size, aaand it is still 2 pounds lighter that a stock-built Carden.
__________________
Gmoney and Smarks are spooners
bodywerks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 07:37 AM   #52
red_z06
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
red_z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dumont, NJ USA
Age: 49
Posts: 932
Default Re: AEROWORKS 35% 260, assembly, discussion, and flying thread

Just finished AW Extra 260.

Equipment:

DA100, MTW TD75K canister setup with stock length non-flex 70mm drop header ( left one cut 1/4" to clear LG bulkhead)
7 5955 on surfs ( 1 more may go on rudder )
5.4v miracle swith with fromeco 2400mah li-ion on ignition
7.4v lipo 4000mah on power expander ( no regulator other than PE to receiver at 5v )

Stock tube, LG, TG

Dry Weight 28.5lb without wheep pants. That means 27.0-27.5lb with stock muffler or 25.0-25.5lb with bme110
red_z06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 07:52 AM   #53
red_z06
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
red_z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dumont, NJ USA
Age: 49
Posts: 932
Default Re: AEROWORKS 35% 260, assembly, discussion, and flying thread

There was minor snag on engine testing. No fire and no sucking fuel.
No fire was traced to bad hall sensor module.

Trouble shooting sequence.
1. check fuel line for sign of fuel in line or smell
2. check ignition batt voltage through charge port.
3. check ignition voltage through output side of ignition switch.
4. pull the plug out and put in the spark plug cap ( no need to ground and the shild provides return path) and flip prop while holding spark plug so the gap is visible.
5. if spark is there check for fuel related problems.
6. If no spark, check for power in the ignition module ( checking bad contact ) by using multimeter by poking with the probe on wire

Now the problem is narrowed down to ignition module or pickup sensor.

7. ignition module from DA50 was first tested to see if it works ( spark )
8. It was plugged to da100 picup sensor with plug in the cap and batt connected
9. No fire! so we have a bad pickup sensor.
10. Although PS is bad, ignition module should be checked also as there is a double failure is possibility.
11. da100 ignition with batt and spark connected to cap is plugged into da50 pickup sensor. Fire! ok so there is only bad pickup sensor.

This is rather disapointing as the engine leaves factory bench tested.
I will call DA on monday to straighten this issue.

Meanwhile, pickup sensor from 2nd da100 will be fitted rather than swapping the engine.

The fuel sucking issure bothers me a bit but will worry about it after firing the engine.
red_z06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 08:21 AM   #54
Dennis C
I have Issues
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,311
Default Re: AEROWORKS 35% 260, assembly, discussion, and flying thread

Red this is a new 100 ?
__________________
"Professional KeyBoard Pilot"
Dennis C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 08:56 AM   #55
red_z06
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
red_z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dumont, NJ USA
Age: 49
Posts: 932
Default Re: AEROWORKS 35% 260, assembly, discussion, and flying thread

After many many flips, I decided to check to see if there is fuel inside of diaphram. To my surprise the diaphram was not engaged to the valve and it was completely dry. Can an engine leave the factory tested with completely dry diaphram with the valve disengaged?
red_z06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 09:00 AM   #56
red_z06
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
red_z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dumont, NJ USA
Age: 49
Posts: 932
Default Re: AEROWORKS 35% 260, assembly, discussion, and flying thread

Quote: Originally Posted by Dennis C
Red this is a new 100 ?
Brand spanking new less than 2 months old with s/n 3256
red_z06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 09:05 AM   #57
red_z06
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
red_z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dumont, NJ USA
Age: 49
Posts: 932
Default Re: AEROWORKS 35% 260, assembly, discussion, and flying thread

Extra 260 comes with thin ( relative ) gage al gear with center section punched out. I normally machine out between bolts on one piece gear to reduce weight. It is close to ( forgot to weigh ) 1/2 the weight of AW Katana LG so you may not save much if any weight by going to CF LG.

If the rain stops I'll go outside and test fire the engine and possibly go for a maiden today.
red_z06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 09:37 AM   #58
Dennis C
I have Issues
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,311
Default Re: AEROWORKS 35% 260, assembly, discussion, and flying thread

Quote: Originally Posted by red_z06
After many many flips, I decided to check to see if there is fuel inside of diaphram. To my surprise the diaphram was not engaged to the valve and it was completely dry. Can an engine leave the factory tested with completely dry diaphram with the valve disengaged?
I guess it could if it sits long enough, get it wet and it should draw fuel
__________________
"Professional KeyBoard Pilot"
Dennis C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2006, 02:40 PM   #59
blaze
Flyin' Around
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Peru, Illinois
Age: 54
Posts: 8
Default Re: AEROWORKS 35% 260, assembly, discussion, and flying thread

I didn't read every thread here but I did see you were going for the Graph Tech Gear for the main gear! Don't expect the gear to hold up. Go back to your Aluminum gear. Mill it out to lighten it and you'll be happier. My 36% Katana just took a dive on Graph Tech new and improved 3D weave gear and I was in a little side wind, about 12mph, but the gear snapped off on one side about 4" up from my wheel just on one side. It then continued to tear out the rest of the gear and rip up the under side of fuse. Luckily I had just removed the wheel pants to do some repair work on them. If I had the stock gear on the plane I would be out today flying it!
I also took off the new and improved 3D weave gear from my F-90. Back to dependable aluminum it will bend a little or bounce but won't break! No more CF gear for me! Too many failures. Mike, at Graph Tech says the new ones wont break. I've got 2 sets to send him.
blaze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2006, 02:54 PM   #60
bodywerks
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
bodywerks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson
Age: 36
Posts: 5,229
Default Re: AEROWORKS 35% 260, assembly, discussion, and flying thread

do a bad enough landing and anything will break! I will definitely agree that CF is only for people who land consistantly, and softly, and are willing to sacrifice a little durabilty to shave weight, like me! For me every ounce counts!
__________________
Gmoney and Smarks are spooners
bodywerks is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 AM.

All Flyinggiants.com content copyright 2006-2012 by RCGroups.com, LLC except where otherwise indicated. The Flyinggiants.com logo is a trademark of RCGroups.com, LLC.
Please report any misuse of our trademarks or copyright violations using the contact form.
RCGroups Network :: RCGroups :: The E Zone :: Lift Zone :: RC Power :: Crackroll :: RC Cars

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.