 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
 |
||||
|
|
|
||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
|
|||||||
08-15-2007, 09:22 AM
|
#1 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ashton Idaho
Age: 45
Posts: 342
|
34% counderballances??
Is it better to go with full counterballances on the elevators on a 34% plane, or partial counterballances, like whats on the H9 Extra? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
08-15-2007, 10:03 AM
|
#2 |
|
Wah wah wee wah!!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Greensboro, NC
Age: 21
Posts: 1,612
 |
Re: 34% counderballances??
More counterbalance area will further reduce the loading on the servo. Also, the longer the counterbalance, the less weight is required in the counterbalance to mass-balance the surface on the hingeline. Just the theory behind it at least...
RJ
__________________
Futaba Extreme Flight RC Desert Aircraft___Castle Creations Aeromodel/Hacker Brushless___Thunder Power Vess Aero B&E Graphix Higher Plane Productions |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
