|
| ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
|
|||||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Uber Contributer
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ypsilanti,Mi.
Posts: 179
|
`I have been involved in IMAC for some few years now and have seen some airframes outfitted with a rather sharp leading edge at the tip and as it makes it way to the root it transituions gradually to the conventional rounded profile.
I was of the impression that this was a useful design element to assist spin/snap entry. Is this still a viable design when we consider todays airframes?? MIke Sotomayor THE Staudman Miguel Sotomayor THE Staudmans Builder !!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
I had it, but then I lost it.
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Highland Village Texas
Age: 19
Posts: 1,863
|
I'm not sure but I had a friend experement with something similar. He taped a piece of tri stock to the LE. He said it helped to be more precise in rolls and such.
__________________
Who knows? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
tissue ? cry baby jack wagon!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: pyote,texas
Age: 58
Posts: 2,650
|
sharper is faster on pitch changes and not quite as stable on a straight flyby if you wiggle the sticks at all.rounded is more forgiving and smoother on pitch changes,that is why most good imac planes do not have a sharp leading edge
__________________
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave >safely and in a well preserved body,but rather to skid in > sideways,totally screwed up,worn out,shouting,"oh damn what a fine ride! AMA 98634 > HEY I GOT A DIVORCE----HELL YEA > Futaba, FROMECO:a good way to get a charge out of life ,,3w all the way for a good day![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Provocateur
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Studying abroad
Posts: 231
|
SHarper will transition into alpha flight easier. I dont think they are faster in pitch changes. JMO
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Old School Hucker
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Age: 44
Posts: 1,080
|
A sharp leading edge WILL allow the airflow to detach quicker making snap entries a bit sharper. It still takes the same angle of attack to depart, but when it reaches critical AoA, the flow detaches MUCH faster with a shapened leading edge. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#6 |
|
doin' it
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Milton, FL
Age: 27
Posts: 27
|
Shaker is right. Take a look at Abbott and Von Doenhoff data. The thickness of an airfoil affects post stall characteristics. That is, after the airfoil reaches max lift/aoa. For a given airfoil of varying thickness both are the same.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
doin' it
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Milton, FL
Age: 27
Posts: 27
|
thewrap: The tri stock would only affect airflow over the wing at high angles of attack. Some GA planes use the same technique as a stall warning. At high aoa it creates a buffet that warns the pilot a stall is close.
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Team OMP Presents the Boxxer ARF!!! | TailTwister | Profile Planes | 116 | 11-14-2008 01:36 PM |
| Edge for Imac??? | Extra260 | Airframes and Kits | 57 | 05-27-2007 02:32 PM |
| Leading edge Dalton 300 | JimC-MD | Aerodynamics | 0 | 03-16-2007 11:43 AM |
| Carden Edge Restoration | Matchless | Workshop Skills | 86 | 10-18-2006 07:33 PM |
| 33% Edge PCM Lockout......... Bye Bye Edge | AirMcNair | Crash and Burn | 44 | 01-11-2006 05:26 PM |