Welcome to The FlyingGiants! - please login or click this bar to join our community...

HobbyKing.com New Products Flash Sale
 

Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!!

Go Back   FlyingGiants > Technology > Aerodynamics
Forgot your password? Create a new account


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-17-2007, 10:49 PM   #16
Vic3D
Mother Huckin'
 
Vic3D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Caguas, Puerto Rico
Age: 25
Posts: 4,304
Awards Showcase
Wesse's Haaard Man Award!: For showing our community the joy of eating jap-a-lin-os and being a haaaard man! Wesse Power! - Issue reason: Welcome to the haaaaard man club! Brass Balls Award: For having sack.. - Issue reason: For having the SACK to photochop two of the most respected names in the hobby into precarious photographs. See http://www.flyinggiants.com/forums/showthread.php?p=90555 The GPTPDSST Award: The Gay Pride Triple Platinum Diamond Studded Steaming Faberge Turd Award. - Issue reason: GPTPDSST Award recieved photochopping the site admin. 
Total Awards: 3
Send a message via AIM to Vic3D Send a message via MSN to Vic3D
Default Re: Need an aerodynamics guru to help me out! Please!

There is no loss of energy. Google Law of conservation of energy.
Vic3D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2007, 11:17 PM   #17
Wojcigitty
THROTTLEMELON
 
Wojcigitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fremont, NH
Age: 25
Posts: 1,033
Send a message via AIM to Wojcigitty
Default Re: Need an aerodynamics guru to help me out! Please!

Quote: Originally Posted by niccolo98
View Post
So your saying, that when a body falls, the only loss of energy is due to heat?
Maybe. There is no loss of energy, as Vic said, it's simply changed from one form to another (kinetic to heat, potential to kinetic, etc).

In this case, the problem states that the potential energy is converted to kinetic energy (falling motion). Some of this kinetic energy is lost, and, because there's nothing else to slow it down, you must assume it's converted to heat.
Wojcigitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2007, 11:35 PM   #18
CRG
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
CRG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Central CA
Posts: 205
Default Re: Need an aerodynamics guru to help me out! Please!

The kinetic energy is not lost in conversion to heat. The 'loss' in kinetic energy is due to the atmosphere slowing the object, and it is the motion through the atmosphere that is creating the heat.

CG.

Quote: Originally Posted by Wojcigitty
View Post
Maybe. There is no loss of energy, as Vic said, it's simply changed from one form to another (kinetic to heat, potential to kinetic, etc).

In this case, the problem states that the potential energy is converted to kinetic energy (falling motion). Some of this kinetic energy is lost, and, because there's nothing else to slow it down, you must assume it's converted to heat.
CRG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2007, 01:23 AM   #19
TheTank
I'm Watching You!

 
TheTank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Connecticut, USA
Age: 31
Posts: 10,144
Awards Showcase
FlyingGiants Good Dude Award: For stepping up to the plate, being a part of a fundraising effort for a good cause. Thank you. - Issue reason: Thank you very much for helping with the recent donation drive. Super-Huck!: Presented for incredible contributions from our members, to our community. - Issue reason: For bringing back the incredible action from the 2006 Don Lowe Masters in form of photos, writeups, and mass quantities of videos for all of our enjoyment. 
Total Awards: 2
Send a message via AIM to TheTank
Default Re: Need an aerodynamics guru to help me out! Please!

Quote: Originally Posted by CRG
View Post
The 'loss' in kinetic energy is due to the atmosphere slowing the object, and it is the motion through the atmosphere that is creating the heat.

CG.
The object will not begin to slow, as it it was dropped, and was accelerating. Only after accelerating to terminal velocity, the object would then maintain velocity, but not slow it down. Now, if it was dropped from say 30,000 feet, the density of the atmosphere as the terminal speeds would change through different levels of the atmosphere, and would product a slowing affect.

As the others said, there is no loss of energy, the form just changes. In this case, to entropy, or heat.
__________________
"Hey at Joe Nall I personally saw Tank kick a kitten in the face!" --66Stang

J'Tec Radiowave
3D HobbyShop
Aircraft International
TheTank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2007, 01:26 AM   #20
TheTank
I'm Watching You!

 
TheTank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Connecticut, USA
Age: 31
Posts: 10,144
Awards Showcase
FlyingGiants Good Dude Award: For stepping up to the plate, being a part of a fundraising effort for a good cause. Thank you. - Issue reason: Thank you very much for helping with the recent donation drive. Super-Huck!: Presented for incredible contributions from our members, to our community. - Issue reason: For bringing back the incredible action from the 2006 Don Lowe Masters in form of photos, writeups, and mass quantities of videos for all of our enjoyment. 
Total Awards: 2
Send a message via AIM to TheTank
Default Re: Need an aerodynamics guru to help me out! Please!

After looking at your post again, I think I misinterpreted what you were saying, you meant the slowing of the acceleration, not the actual slowing of the object. In that case, yes, acceleration lessens as it reaches terminal velocity, and that energy is lost to heat. (Note to self, read more carefully next time!!! )
__________________
"Hey at Joe Nall I personally saw Tank kick a kitten in the face!" --66Stang

J'Tec Radiowave
3D HobbyShop
Aircraft International
TheTank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2007, 07:07 PM   #21
niccolo98
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
niccolo98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 20
Posts: 691
Send a message via AIM to niccolo98
Default Re: Need an aerodynamics guru to help me out! Please!

Sorry, I meant to say converted. So, again what your saying is, tat when an object falls, the only conversion of energy, is that of the kinetic into thermal??
seems odd to me.
nick
__________________
“Education is the ability to listen to almost anything without losing your temper."
-Robert Frost
niccolo98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2007, 07:59 PM   #22
Wojcigitty
THROTTLEMELON
 
Wojcigitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fremont, NH
Age: 25
Posts: 1,033
Send a message via AIM to Wojcigitty
Default Re: Need an aerodynamics guru to help me out! Please!

Quote: Originally Posted by niccolo98
View Post
Sorry, I meant to say converted. So, again what your saying is, tat when an object falls, the only conversion of energy, is that of the kinetic into thermal??
seems odd to me.
nick
Maybe. But in this case, you are told that the potential energy is converted to thermal and kinetic, nothing else. Since you know how much is kinetic, you must assume the rest is thermal.
Wojcigitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2007, 01:19 AM   #23
somethnextra
doin' it
 
somethnextra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Milton, FL
Age: 27
Posts: 27
Default Re: Need an aerodynamics guru to help me out! Please!

The only energy tradeoffs in this case would be between thermal, mechanical, and potential. There are other kinds of energy (chemical, magnetic, electrical, etc...) but I wouldn't think they'd be applicable here unless your ball is a ball of plutonium. Also, almost ALL physics problems (especially one like this) neglect air friction. It's an assumption inherent to the problem for a course like this.
somethnextra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2007, 01:40 AM   #24
prizzy
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
prizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: High Point, NC
Age: 34
Posts: 9,196
Default Re: Need an aerodynamics guru to help me out! Please!

The math is correct, I think you professor wrote the question badly. The engergy is lost to friction of course, but it will not manifest itself is totally heat. Think about a large draggy object like a parachute, it is losing a ton of KE to drag, with no significant real world heat gain. He would have been better to write it saying what amount of energy is lost, period. Unless he gave you the cross sectional area, then it gets funner.
__________________

Team Futaba

prizzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2008, 01:24 AM   #25
jeffareid
Flyin' Around
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 8
Default Re: Need an aerodynamics guru to help me out! Please!

There's very little energy lost to heat generation. Most of the energy "loss" is due to acceleration of air (kinetic and pressure energy, not thermal). Work was done on the air to accelerate it, and is equal to the integral of [drag_force(s) ds] (where s is the path of the object). As the object gets close to the ground, the air increases in pressure, and accelerates outwards.
jeffareid is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Forum! Aerodynamics Discussions madmax Aerodynamics 0 10-03-2006 03:59 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 AM.

All Flyinggiants.com content copyright 2006-2012 by RCGroups.com, LLC except where otherwise indicated. The Flyinggiants.com logo is a trademark of RCGroups.com, LLC.
Please report any misuse of our trademarks or copyright violations using the contact form.
RCGroups Network :: RCGroups :: The E Zone :: Lift Zone :: RC Power :: Crackroll :: RC Cars

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.