Welcome to The FlyingGiants! - please login or click this bar to join our community...

HobbyKing.com New Products Flash Sale
 

Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!!

Go Back   FlyingGiants > Giant Scale Planes > Airframes and Kits
Forgot your password? Create a new account


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-24-2007, 02:30 PM   #16
murry
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
murry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: texas
Posts: 344
Default Re: Moving the cg forward

I can't tell the difference
murry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2007, 03:01 PM   #17
rcdart
Would be, if I could be

 
rcdart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: QLD Australia
Age: 49
Posts: 4,166
Send a message via Skype™ to rcdart
Default Re: Moving the cg forward

Mine was cg @114mm with the four tail servos, the plane was like porpise and would not lock in, the 1" arms give me heaps of throw for IMAC, the plane flies unlimited no worries at all. Whilst I believe that you would get away with the 2 rudder servos, I preferr to stick with three.
__________________
Confuscious say... man who have model airplanes... needs a wife with job. NOW THAT HE HAS ONE FOR HIMSELF
Member of the TAS 2007 ROTW Boat Race Team (The WINNERS)

IMAC Sequence Comittee
IMAC Rules Comittee
ASAA Life member
www.scaleaeros.com.au Home of ASAA
www.desertaircraft.com.au
rcdart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2007, 04:00 PM   #18
Extra260
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Extra260's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Durango Colorado
Age: 20
Posts: 1,945
Default Re: Moving the cg forward

When you say that I could get away with it do you mean it would be marginal performance??? If so I will use 3. I only do Imac so if that makes any difference. Murry could you post more pics of inside the hatch all around???
Extra260 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2007, 04:22 PM   #19
murry
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
murry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: texas
Posts: 344
Default Re: Moving the cg forward

pic
Attached Thumbnails
  • Click image for larger version

Name:	000_1775.JPG
Views:	14
Size:	142.7 KB
ID:	76918 142.7 KB · Views: 14

  • Click image for larger version

Name:	000_1777.JPG
Views:	18
Size:	162.6 KB
ID:	76919 162.6 KB · Views: 18

  • Click image for larger version

Name:	000_1778.JPG
Views:	17
Size:	157.6 KB
ID:	76920 157.6 KB · Views: 17

murry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2007, 05:35 PM   #20
Dan767
That's at least a 9
 
Dan767's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Federal Way, WA
Posts: 1,773
Default Re: Moving the cg forward

I have three 5955's, on the rudder in a SWB self adjusting tray, located just aft of the fuel tank. It's better to locate the tray as far forward as you can. I've not seen the Greves pipes in a while, so I can't remember if they are in the way like my 3W cans are.
__________________
Dan


Dan767 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2007, 08:57 PM   #21
Extra260
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Extra260's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Durango Colorado
Age: 20
Posts: 1,945
Default Re: Moving the cg forward

Quote: Originally Posted by Dan767
View Post
I have three 5955's, on the rudder in a SWB self adjusting tray, located just aft of the fuel tank. It's better to locate the tray as far forward as you can. I've not seen the Greves pipes in a while, so I can't remember if they are in the way like my 3W cans are.
would you say that it would be marginal with two??? Is there plenty with 3??? I dont know about the self adjusting because I dont really want to dish out 245 on a tray. It sounds like I will get 3 5955's though.
Extra260 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2007, 09:29 PM   #22
Dan767
That's at least a 9
 
Dan767's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Federal Way, WA
Posts: 1,773
Default Re: Moving the cg forward

The way that I look at it, the manual calls for a total of about 800 in.-ozs. of torque. If you only use two, you're going to be short of what you need. This rudder is big. The reason I strongly suggest the self adjusting tray is the possibilty of a servo/receiver failure. With a self adjusting tray, if something quits, you still have at least partial rudder control. In a crosswind, that's money.

BTW, From SWB's website, $225. It's the one with the cables, jut to avoid the possibilty of confusion, but I'm sure we're talking about the same tray.
__________________
Dan



Last edited by Dan767; 11-24-2007 at 09:33 PM. Reason: SWB Reference
Dan767 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 12:11 AM   #23
Extra260
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Extra260's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Durango Colorado
Age: 20
Posts: 1,945
Default Re: Moving the cg forward

I will deffinetly get 3 servos but if something quits I will probably land. Unless I am reading your post wrong. Will I need and offset tray or straight.
Extra260 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 12:18 AM   #24
Dan767
That's at least a 9
 
Dan767's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Federal Way, WA
Posts: 1,773
Default Re: Moving the cg forward

The 3X self adjusting tray has the 5" arm that you need. I would call or e-mail SWB and let them know what you're building. You will also need to order the double lock arms for the Hitec Servos as well
__________________
Dan



Last edited by Dan767; 11-25-2007 at 12:25 AM.
Dan767 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 12:31 AM   #25
Extra260
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Extra260's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Durango Colorado
Age: 20
Posts: 1,945
Default Re: Moving the cg forward

Quote: Originally Posted by Dan767
View Post
The 3X self adjusting tray has the 5" arm that you need. I would call or e-mail SWB and let them know what you're building. You will also need to order the double lock arms for the Hitec Servos as well
In my thread called set up my 40% I have what I have bought. All I need are the rudder servos and I tray. But I dont see the huge andvatage to spend 150 more for a tray. I think I will just got with the regular tray with offset.
Extra260 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 10:11 AM   #26
Extra260
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Extra260's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Durango Colorado
Age: 20
Posts: 1,945
Default Re: Moving the cg forward

How about I use the supplied carbon tray and move it under the tank. Could that be possible???
Extra260 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 12:10 PM   #27
Dan767
That's at least a 9
 
Dan767's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Federal Way, WA
Posts: 1,773
Default Re: Moving the cg forward

Yes it is. Use the two formers and locate it anywhere you want. You can also figure out a way to epoxy it anywhere without the formers.
__________________
Dan


Dan767 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 01:42 PM   #28
Extra260
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Extra260's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Durango Colorado
Age: 20
Posts: 1,945
Default Re: Moving the cg forward

Do you think that would help with the cg Dan? Then I would just have to get an offset arm for the 3rd servo right??? The carbon tray would also be lighter than a swb tray right??? Could it even fit under the greeves pipes under this location? Could you post some pics of your set up??? thanks
Extra260 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 02:46 PM   #29
brownj
oliveraerobatix
 
brownj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 46
Default Re: Moving the cg forward

E260, Dan, others,
I will very respectfully take issue with the need for 3 rudder servos in your 260, especially if you ONLY intend to fly IMAC. I first want to say I fly a MX2, so I want to put that up front. BUT, I use two 8611A's in the tail with the push-pull set up, identical to Mark Trent's, flying Razorbacks's, etc. I don't think the two planes are so vastly different that my (and others) set up can be discounted. I've flown both, although the 260 was a friend's, so I didn't fly it very agressively (but lovely flying plane).
http://www.marktrent3d.com/mx2build.html
My MX2 will knife edge loop with authority, IMO a true test of rudder authority. And I don't have any balance issues with the rudder servos in the tail. DA150, MTW cans.
Not trying to start a disagreement thread here, just my experience and opinion.
Good luck with your plane, You'll love the way it flies.
Jim
brownj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 03:03 PM   #30
Extra260
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Extra260's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Durango Colorado
Age: 20
Posts: 1,945
Default Re: Moving the cg forward

I dont think that I will mount them in the tail though because with only imac I cant have it tail heavy. Other wise I would. The only question now is will 2 in a tray up front be enough. I might just end up getting 2 8711's for weight.
Extra260 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Getting/Balancing CG right wickkerr82 Groundschool: 3D Flying and Aerobatics 12 11-29-2007 11:03 PM
Great Planes 25% Yak CG Help Pappy Airframes and Kits 4 11-03-2007 05:25 PM
chip hyde cap x and the cg that wasent arfwrecker Airframes and Kits 7 05-12-2007 03:45 AM
How do you CG ? GremlinX General Discussion 22 04-20-2006 03:24 PM
GSP 80"Giles 202 CG issue Ialwayscrash Workshop Skills 1 03-19-2006 08:18 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 AM.

All Flyinggiants.com content copyright 2006-2012 by RCGroups.com, LLC except where otherwise indicated. The Flyinggiants.com logo is a trademark of RCGroups.com, LLC.
Please report any misuse of our trademarks or copyright violations using the contact form.
RCGroups Network :: RCGroups :: The E Zone :: Lift Zone :: RC Power :: Crackroll :: RC Cars

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.