Welcome to The FlyingGiants! - please login or click this bar to join our community...

HobbyKing.com New Products Flash Sale
 

Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!!

Go Back   FlyingGiants > Technology > Radios
Forgot your password? Create a new account


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-10-2008, 07:36 AM   #1441
jonkoppisch
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
jonkoppisch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mobile Alabama
Posts: 730
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

That's the old Fat Albert, right behind the museum!!!

Sorry to hear about that! I've been constantly flying in the 90's with no problems.... I do think that futaba needs to look and see what's going on!
jonkoppisch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2008, 02:24 PM   #1442
USN_POPS
Seasoned Veteran
 
USN_POPS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Enumclaw, Washington
Posts: 296
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Quote: Originally Posted by Kal
View Post
Which fasst receier is this? I use the 7 channel in my bocat and have flown that in 114 degree (in the shade) heat without a problem. I don't leave the plane in the sun tho.
It was the 607 FS that came with the module for my 9C.

I figure it was a combination of small plane, batteries running warmer in the heat, more warming from the speed controller and to some extent a lack of cooling air travelling through the fuse. But I won't be flying again when it is hot, too big a risk.
USN_POPS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 01:36 AM   #1443
gregw
Flyin' Around
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 9
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Quote: Originally Posted by USN_POPS
View Post
It was the 607 FS that came with the module for my 9C.

I figure it was a combination of small plane, batteries running warmer in the heat, more warming from the speed controller and to some extent a lack of cooling air travelling through the fuse. But I won't be flying again when it is hot, too big a risk.
I think you really need to add air vents to the fuse to circulate air around the Rx if you're getting heat related problems on FASST at only 90+ degree temps...
gregw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 07:42 AM   #1444
Tin man
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
Tin man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lake Havasu City, AZ
Posts: 539
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Yea 90's F is nothing. I was test-running a DA 150 the other day with the canopy off of my 40% comparf. It was 110 F at the time and I was barely able to handle it.

Anyhoo, the 6014 was exposed to direct, intense, sunlight for 2 hours--most of that time with the engine off. Not even a hiccup.

That said I will be shading the receiver in plane with a small piece of white-covered balsa so it stays shaded when the canopy is off.

I did, however, lose a plane with a 607 in it. Plane went outta control, with jerky uncommanded manuevers. Was ready to blame FASST but after-crash analysis showed a faulty Equalizer II as the most likely culprit. Even so, I can't bring myself to run a 607 again. (I do have 200+ flights on 617s without issue.)


Keep in mind I live in one of the hottest places in the USA: Lake Havasu City, AZ.


EDIT: Posting this from my iPhone not realizing it wasn't really a FASST thread (wonder how THAT happened). Sorry 'bout the off-topic post.
--
Mike

Last edited by Tin man; 08-11-2008 at 07:54 AM.
Tin man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 08:51 AM   #1445
jonkoppisch
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
jonkoppisch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mobile Alabama
Posts: 730
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Shoot!!! I was wrong! I apologize!! After playing with the xps for awhile this morning using special circumstances & my new remote, portable telemetry unit, I was able to make it hop A slow rise in interference made a BIG difference...

Anyway, here's the vid...
Attached Files

Last edited by jonkoppisch; 08-11-2008 at 09:02 AM.
jonkoppisch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 10:50 AM   #1446
Wojcigitty
THROTTLEMELON
 
Wojcigitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fremont, NH
Age: 25
Posts: 1,033
Send a message via AIM to Wojcigitty
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Quote: Originally Posted by jonkoppisch
View Post
Shoot!!! I was wrong! I apologize!! After playing with the xps for awhile this morning using special circumstances & my new remote, portable telemetry unit, I was able to make it hop A slow rise in interference made a BIG difference...

Anyway, here's the vid...
I think you deserve an award for the best "stupid XPS hopping" video.
Wojcigitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 01:45 PM   #1447
Julez
Super Contributer
 
Julez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 148
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Quote: Originally Posted by USN_POPS
View Post
It was the 607 FS that came with the module for my 9C.

I figure it was a combination of small plane, batteries running warmer in the heat, more warming from the speed controller and to some extent a lack of cooling air travelling through the fuse. But I won't be flying again when it is hot, too big a risk.
The risk of not having a cooling airflow through the fuselage is bigger than the risk of ambient temperature.
You are exposing your ESC, the battery pack and the engine to unnecessary high heat levels, too.
A cooling airflow through the fuselage is a MUST for every electric plane.

Here is some information about cooling:
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=257604

I recently made nice NACA inlets for my robbe Arcus, and this helped to cool the ESC considerably.
Julez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 03:28 PM   #1448
jonkoppisch
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
jonkoppisch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mobile Alabama
Posts: 730
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Quote: Originally Posted by Wojcigitty
View Post
I think you deserve an award for the best "stupid XPS hopping" video.
Since the guys with telemetry etc seem to be having a hard time documenting the hop I thought I'd help them out...
jonkoppisch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 04:49 PM   #1449
Gordito Volador
Flying Fatboy
 
Gordito Volador's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ruskin, Florida
Posts: 30
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Jon,

I happen to appreciate your hopping video. Thanks for a job well done.

Regards, Bill
__________________
"Let Me Hear Your Guns"
Gordito Volador is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 04:55 PM   #1450
jonkoppisch
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
jonkoppisch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mobile Alabama
Posts: 730
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

lucky for the frog, I didn't have a snake handy or the interference might very well have won
jonkoppisch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 05:47 PM   #1451
Woketman
Uber Contributer
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Slidell
Age: 52
Posts: 196
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Quote: Originally Posted by jonkoppisch
View Post
Shoot!!! I was wrong! I apologize!! After playing with the xps for awhile this morning using special circumstances & my new remote, portable telemetry unit, I was able to make it hop A slow rise in interference made a BIG difference...

Anyway, here's the vid...
AWESOME video Jon. IT HOPS!!!!
Woketman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2008, 01:22 AM   #1452
USN_POPS
Seasoned Veteran
 
USN_POPS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Enumclaw, Washington
Posts: 296
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Quote: Originally Posted by Julez
View Post
The risk of not having a cooling airflow through the fuselage is bigger than the risk of ambient temperature.
You are exposing your ESC, the battery pack and the engine to unnecessary high heat levels, too.
A cooling airflow through the fuselage is a MUST for every electric plane.

Here is some information about cooling:
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=257604

I recently made nice NACA inlets for my robbe Arcus, and this helped to cool the ESC considerably.
There are cooling ducts built into the Diamante, and they are adequate for normal temps. I have about 50 flights on the plane in the cooler weather here in western Washington. Everything comes down cool, batteries, ESC and motor are barely warm after a 8-10 minute flight.

This was an exceptionally hot afternoon, and probably it got very hot inside the fuse. I'm going to run some temp checks on the plane sitting in the sun, and see if the RX does get hot if i let it sit in the sun. About the only way to test it here in the 70-75 degree weather we are having.

I do plan on adding some intakes during the repair process however just to be sure.
USN_POPS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2008, 09:12 AM   #1453
jonkoppisch
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
 
jonkoppisch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mobile Alabama
Posts: 730
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

More on the frog.

To make it up to the frog I bought him a cigar and brought in a couple of female frogs for the afternoon and played a video of the muppets for them to watch After that, i put him out on the back porch and the last i saw of him he was heading off in the Orlando Florida direction leaving a smoke trail

If you would like to join the list of frog sympathizers you can go to http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showt...0#post10329392 and post your outcry for the mistreatment of the poor froggy

disclaimer: No frogs were hurt or poked in the making of this video
jonkoppisch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2008, 10:16 AM   #1454
Dustflyer
KIGECA
 
Dustflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Abington, Pa
Age: 58
Posts: 72
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Quote: Originally Posted by Wojcigitty
View Post
I think you deserve an award for the best "stupid XPS hopping" video.
He deserves a reward for keeping a sense of humor in spite of losing a jet because of a radio system that failed to perform as advertised. XPS has proven itself to be grossly inadequate as a remote control system.

Want to talk about stupid? I saw an incredibly idiotic comment on another forum about how XPS is a fixed channel system just like Spektrum, as if that made it just as good as Spektrum. That is precisely the problem with it and why Spektrum uses two channels and two receivers, because that works and what XPS does doesn't.

I use Spektrum because it works best. It is the only system designed from scratch specifically for RC. I've talked to people at Spektrum familiar with the design phase. They looked at frequency hopping schemes and rejected the idea. They found the dual channel dual receiver system just works better. I have also talked with high level jet flyers and turbine people involved in early flight testing and evaluation; same conclusion, Spektrum works better than any other scheme.

XPS, in spite of what they advertise or claim, apparently operates on a single frequency with a single antenna. Ever notice that all wireless microphone and guitar systems are dual channel, dual antenna true diversity systems? Even that stuff uses two channels, not single channel or frequency hopping.

WARNING:

If you fly an RC airplane with XPS there is a very high probability it will crash due to the inadequacies of the radio control system.

Last edited by Dustflyer; 08-12-2008 at 10:27 AM.
Dustflyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2008, 12:47 PM   #1455
Wojcigitty
THROTTLEMELON
 
Wojcigitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fremont, NH
Age: 25
Posts: 1,033
Send a message via AIM to Wojcigitty
Default Re: Independent tests prove lack of frequency hopping with XPS

Dustflyer,

Chill out dude. I meant that it was the funniest of the stupid XPS hopping videos. Better than this one:


I didn't mean that his attitude was stupid or that mocking XPS is stupid. He's got every right to be mad, I've been burned by bad products in the past too.
Wojcigitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Xtreme Link Experiences Fly3DWithStyle Radios 1221 03-27-2009 12:37 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 AM.

All Flyinggiants.com content copyright 2006-2012 by RCGroups.com, LLC except where otherwise indicated. The Flyinggiants.com logo is a trademark of RCGroups.com, LLC.
Please report any misuse of our trademarks or copyright violations using the contact form.
RCGroups Network :: RCGroups :: The E Zone :: Lift Zone :: RC Power :: Crackroll :: RC Cars

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.