|
| ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
|
|||||||
|
|
#76 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 327
|
Not exactly correct. I have licensed QQAC exclusively to build and offer RC models of the Pitts Model 12, Python, Ti-12, and a few more airplanes yet to be announced to the public. We have copyrights on all these color schemes and shapes as well as trademarks on the names and logos (Honestly, I am surprised other companies like Extra, Zivko, MX Aircraft, Piper, Lockheed, etc. are not more involved in RC licensing of their trademarks). The licenses we have with QQAC include the use of the shapes, names, logos and schemes. So, any of these airplanes offered by other manufacturers are technically in viloation of trademark and copyright laws. It is up to QQAC to decide if they wish to block the sale of these airplanes, names and schemes by other makers. Quique and Wayne are great guys so I don't think they will unless someone is clearly trying to knock off what they are making like what happened with the 69" yak. If I recall correctly, the RC model Ti-12 Quique has is a different size than the kit Bob offers. The one Quique had at TAS was designed for the DA200 not the DA150 airplane Bob kits. So, Quique's model is not just one of the kits with a few mods....It is a different airframe of different dimensions, features and structure. Sometimes when simply looking at something in photos, many details are missed. Kevin Kimball |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#77 |
|
Mind your business....
![]() |
BURNED!!!!!
__________________
![]() 50% Hempel Edge 540 3W 275 50% Hempel Yak 55 3W 275 50% Hempel Version II Edge 540 3W 275 50% Hempel Yak 55 3W 275 100cc Hempel Yak 55 3W 106 50cc Hempel Yak 55 D.A 50 50cc Hempel Yak 55 40% Hempel Cub |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Mind your business....
![]() |
Sooooo maybe a 50% DR-1 Triplane???
__________________
![]() 50% Hempel Edge 540 3W 275 50% Hempel Yak 55 3W 275 50% Hempel Version II Edge 540 3W 275 50% Hempel Yak 55 3W 275 100cc Hempel Yak 55 3W 106 50cc Hempel Yak 55 D.A 50 50cc Hempel Yak 55 40% Hempel Cub |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brownsburg
Posts: 1,924
|
Super Skybolt....Nice long fuse with a 10% rule added it will be a straight line monster. And with the many varients out there you would have a lot to choose from..
__________________
"Grace Alone" "Two Wings Beat One Everytime" EG Raven 33%(F.S. $500) Carden Yak 37% (FOR SALE $1100) Hemple HyperBipe ( FOR SALE T.B.D.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#80 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
IMAC ARD - Alberta, Canada
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 971
|
![]() That Reed Falcon might make a very nice IMAC plane and it doesn't look like everything else out there. Cool suggestion! Jim - thanks for the clarifications. I think I saw a post that QQ's first big Python with the 200 was a Bob Truworthy 41% kit that had been modified (who knows how much.) Then I saw another post saying his Ti-12 was that original 200cc with a new scheme and new wing tips. The QQ posted it was a scratch build... Probably only a handfull know and it doesn't really matter. Both those planes are awesome. I am feeling a Hempel Bipe in my future ![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#81 |
|
Super Contributer
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 103
|
MikeC3D,
Kevin is correct. Quique's Ti-12 is not one of my kits with mods. Quique used my plans only as a starting point. We completely redesigned the airframe and wings. It looks the same but it's not. It was designed around the DA-200. Bob Trueworthy |
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Not dead yet?
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 14
|
Bill, what is your opinion of the Hanger 9 Ultimate Design on a scale of 1-10. What would you change about it? Maybe a better question is, What do you look for in an Ultimate design that really "turns your crank". I've "heard" that QQ likes the S-12's round cowel because it is easier to roll. (less feedback from the fus. design). Do you find this to be true? Sorry for the barrage of questions but I'm very interested in the difference between the two. Lets face it, for me the Ultimate is the nicer looking biplane, but I've learned that I'd rather have a great flying LIGHTplane. Don't get me wrong, I've never owned an Ultimate. The last bipe I owned was a DV. I'm just looking for your expert opinion on the differences between the two.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Gettin' Lower!
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: Charles Town, West Virginia
Posts: 40
|
I don't normally fly anything over 100CC ... but I would spring for any size Waco!!
Barry in WV |
|
|
|
|
|
#84 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Flyin' Around
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Moscow, Russia
Age: 40
Posts: 21
|
She`s flying like big slow and easy elephant. But is unlimited 3D-mashine that I ever flew.
__________________
EMHW Ultimate 2.85 3W-157B2 CS-TS CARF MX2 DA-150 QQ Pitts Phyton 3W-85Xi w/greve pipe Krill Katana 33% 3W-85Xi w/greve pipe
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#85 |
|
Not dead yet?
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 14
|
Are we talking about any bipe or bipes with 3d standards?
Last edited by Thirteen Wings; 10-25-2008 at 09:16 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Burn Gas.. Bend wings.
![]() |
WACO YMF-5 would be a awsome plane to see in this size,, would sure put on a good show!
mike
__________________
Get your cool FG Mouse pad HERE: http://www.flyinggiants.com/forums/s...ad.php?t=55338 IMACPhotos http://www.flyinggiants.com/forums/s...ad.php?t=55755 My XFC Photo Flood : http://www.flyinggiants.com/forums/f...re-photos.html www.hcrcm.org (my flying club......) http://www.mbphotos.exposuremanager.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#87 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
3D JUNKIE
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SanAntonio,TX
Age: 40
Posts: 3,386
|
KKimble, China doesnt have copyright laws, as evident in all of the knock off's out there, and how can you have the rights to the m-12 that has been modeled for many years. There have been a few other reputable companies with Pitt's M-12's, Pythons out for some time now, so are they all in violation of these so called rights to models. I dont understand how this could be, is TT in violation with there new M-12 version. or How about Comp Arf with their M-12 or python versions. Also isnt it true that if just one simple thing is changed, a demintion, or some change that would make it not an "EXACT" replica be considered ok? Mr. Trueworthy, You told me yourself that these where your kits that YOU built for QQ with modifications of his specific's, and that you could not share the mods other than the obvious. I talked to QQ personally on the phone about the larger Python when he flew it at NALL in 06, when he was advertising 75cc,100cc,and 150cc. He told me that you had custom built YOUR Kit to his specific modifications. Now you guys are saying that what Im saying is not true, that is just so wrong in many ways. I have absolutely no reason to make up stuff or report obscure information that I recieved in the venture of a big Biplane as a Hobbiest with a passion for this particular model. I do not wish to argue about this, I just dont like being called a liar!
Last edited by MikeC3D; 10-26-2008 at 10:47 PM. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#88 |
|
Bow to the King!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Amelia, Ohio
Age: 50
Posts: 10,838
|
Mike Busutil is avoiding his own thread he started bragging about his flying skills. He needs to get back in there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Mind your business....
![]() |
Not at all bragging............Just more experinced than you craven
__________________
![]() 50% Hempel Edge 540 3W 275 50% Hempel Yak 55 3W 275 50% Hempel Version II Edge 540 3W 275 50% Hempel Yak 55 3W 275 100cc Hempel Yak 55 3W 106 50cc Hempel Yak 55 D.A 50 50cc Hempel Yak 55 40% Hempel Cub |
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 327
|
Mike,
I haven't seen where you have been called a liar with respect to the subject of the model 12, python, Ti-12, etc. I do see where myself and others have made attempts to correct misunderstandings you and others may have about these airplanes. I would be more than happy to explain these issues to you in greater detail. Drop me a PM with your phone number and I will give you a call to chat about it at a time that is good for you. Or if you prefer, I can continue the discussion here in this thread. Let me know. Kevin Kimball |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Which 50cc Biplane? Ultimate or Pitts? | phippsj | Airframes and Kits | 36 | 10-01-2011 05:31 PM |
| 50cc Biplane | maineflyer | General Discussion | 37 | 08-17-2008 03:09 AM |
| velSatis 3D biplane | JEKL | General Discussion - Electrics | 4 | 04-25-2007 06:01 PM |
| Best indoor Biplane Foamy?! | TipStall | Foamies | 16 | 12-15-2006 02:25 PM |
| Finished biplane. | TonyThomasian | Foamies | 6 | 03-18-2006 12:35 PM |