|
| ||||||
| Welcome to The FlyingGiants Community! We're all about fun, and inside you'll find the greatest, friendliest, and most helpful group of people around! If this is your first time visiting, please check out site, and click here to sign up! We hope to see you soon!! |
|
|||||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Gettin' Lower!
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 54
|
The SU31 from GP uses 4 heavy duty screw lock push rod connectors to couple the servo arms. Do you think this is good enough for 80 inch span plane? I was thinking of replacing them with 4-40 ball links and turnbuckles to couple the servo arms together. What do you guys use? Tks
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Super Contributer
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Illinois
Age: 48
Posts: 119
|
Hi sportflyer1.
I see nobody has answered your quesh, so I thought I would add my two cents; Have you considered using just one servo? I'm flying the 27% GP Extra and Edge, both with rudders powered by a single Hobbico CS-170 servo. Puts out like 333 oz/in torque @6.0V. More than enough--probably overkill. Other servos would probably work as well. As far as answering your question directly, this is the same setup (large screw-locks) I used during development of the Extra. It worked fine. I know you were looking for more objective answers from someone other than a person from the Company to answer your question, but that's the best I can do for you.
__________________
A small fish in a small sea Tim Lampe Hobbico R&D |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Gettin' Lower!
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 54
|
Next time I will use a large servo for simplicity. Anyway this time I went for the dubro 4-40 turnbuckles and HD ball link config. It took quite a while to set up the servo throws on both servos to reduce servos fighting each other . The 4 screw locks would have saved some time. I was just worried about the screw locks working lose due to vibrations. Tks
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Bad-ass Super Contributer!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: California
Posts: 4,323
|
They do, and they will. That's the big benefit of doing it the way you did. There are other methods, such as using H-9 Pro Links, self adjusting servo trays, and direct coupling similar to what you have done. Matching the servo travels is critical to success. Using an amp meter to measure the current draw at various positions to see precisely how well they are matched is also necessary. One can be pulling qiute an additional load from the other and you won't know about it until a servo fails. With any direct ganging of servos, failure of one pretty much assures failure of the others in the series.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Gettin' Lower!
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 54
|
I used an ammeter to check the current draw of one servo while I moved the ganged servos. Otherwise it would be impossible to get reasonable balance. The servos tracked quite well after I got the center and end points dialled in. I could have done a 5 point servo adjustment but I thought that the 3 point is good enough. Servo current draw is definitely quite high when they are fighting each other . Tks
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| jr 8711's shaking | harv | Radios | 50 | 08-27-2008 05:58 PM |
| 8711 or 5955 | kim3D | General Discussion | 103 | 04-02-2008 06:08 PM |
| servo arm's & linkage in a 46% ultimate | meloni.racing | Airframes and Kits | 1 | 12-01-2007 05:18 AM |
| Rudder pull-pull parts/gang servo arms. | rcflyer | Build Threads | 8 | 07-22-2007 12:04 PM |
| 5955 Stock Servo Arms | F3AFlyer7 | Radios | 12 | 06-16-2006 01:36 PM |